Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Contextual Recommendations and Low-Regret Cutting-Plane Algorithms

Published 9 Jun 2021 in cs.LG, cs.DS, and math.OC | (2106.04819v1)

Abstract: We consider the following variant of contextual linear bandits motivated by routing applications in navigational engines and recommendation systems. We wish to learn a hidden dd-dimensional value w<sup>∗w<sup>*. Every round, we are presented with a subset X<em>t⊆R<sup>d\mathcal{X}<em>t \subseteq \mathbb{R}<sup>d of possible actions. If we choose (i.e. recommend to the user) action xtx_t, we obtain utility ⟨xt,w<sup>∗</sup>⟩\langle x_t, w<sup>*</sup> \rangle but only learn the identity of the best action arg⁡max⁡</em>x∈Xt⟨x,w<sup>∗</sup>⟩\arg\max</em>{x \in \mathcal{X}_t} \langle x, w<sup>*</sup> \rangle. We design algorithms for this problem which achieve regret O(dlog⁡T)O(d\log T) and exp⁡(O(dlog⁡d))\exp(O(d \log d)). To accomplish this, we design novel cutting-plane algorithms with low "regret" -- the total distance between the true point w<sup>∗w<sup>* and the hyperplanes the separation oracle returns. We also consider the variant where we are allowed to provide a list of several recommendations. In this variant, we give an algorithm with O(d<sup>2</sup>log⁡d)O(d<sup>2</sup> \log d) regret and list size poly(d)\mathrm{poly}(d). Finally, we construct nearly tight algorithms for a weaker variant of this problem where the learner only learns the identity of an action that is better than the recommendation. Our results rely on new algorithmic techniques in convex geometry (including a variant of Steiner's formula for the centroid of a convex set) which may be of independent interest.

Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.