Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 28 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Algorithms for Sparse LPN and LSPN Against Low-noise (2407.19215v8)

Published 27 Jul 2024 in cs.CR

Abstract: We consider sparse variants of the classical Learning Parities with random Noise (LPN) problem. Our main contribution is a new algorithmic framework that provides learning algorithms against low-noise for both Learning Sparse Parities (LSPN) problem and sparse LPN problem. Different from previous approaches for LSPN and sparse LPN, this framework has a simple structure and runs in polynomial space. Let $n$ be the dimension, $k$ denote the sparsity, and $\eta$ be the noise rate. As a fundamental problem in computational learning theory, Learning Sparse Parities with Noise (LSPN) assumes the hidden parity is $k$-sparse. While a simple enumeration algorithm takes ${n \choose k}=O(n/k)k$ time, previously known results stills need ${n \choose k/2} = \Omega(n/k){k/2}$ time for any noise rate $\eta$. Our framework provides a LSPN algorithm runs in time $O(\eta \cdot n/k)k$ for any noise rate $\eta$, which improves the state-of-the-art of LSPN whenever $\eta \in ( k/n,\sqrt{k/n})$. The sparse LPN problem is closely related to the classical problem of refuting random $k$-CSP and has been widely used in cryptography as the hardness assumption. Different from the standard LPN, it samples random $k$-sparse vectors. Because the number of $k$-sparse vectors is ${n \choose k}<n^k$, sparse LPN has learning algorithms in polynomial time when $m>n{k/2}$. However, much less is known about learning algorithms for constant $k$ like 3 and $m<n{k/2}$ samples, except the Gaussian elimination algorithm of time $e{\eta n}$. Our framework provides a learning algorithm in $e{O(\eta \cdot n{\frac{\delta+1}{2}})}$ time given $\delta \in (0,1)$ and $m \approx n{1+(1-\delta)\cdot \frac{k-1}{2}}$ samples. This improves previous learning algorithms. For example, in the classical setting of $k=3$ and $m=n{1.4}$, our algorithm would be faster than than previous approaches for any $\eta<n{-0.7}$.

Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com