Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Strawberry detection and counting based on YOLOv7 pruning and information based tracking algorithm (2407.12614v1)

Published 17 Jul 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: The strawberry industry yields significant economic benefits for Florida, yet the process of monitoring strawberry growth and yield is labor-intensive and costly. The development of machine learning-based detection and tracking methodologies has been used for helping automated monitoring and prediction of strawberry yield, still, enhancement has been limited as previous studies only applied the deep learning method for flower and fruit detection, which did not consider the unique characteristics of image datasets collected by the machine vision system. This study proposed an optimal pruning of detection heads of the deep learning model (YOLOv7 and its variants) that could achieve fast and precise strawberry flower, immature fruit, and mature fruit detection. Thereafter, an enhanced object tracking algorithm, which is called the Information Based Tracking Algorithm (IBTA) utilized the best detection result, removed the Kalman Filter, and integrated moving direction, velocity, and spatial information to improve the precision in strawberry flower and fruit tracking. The proposed pruning of detection heads across YOLOv7 variants, notably Pruning-YOLOv7-tiny with detection head 3 and Pruning-YOLOv7-tiny with heads 2 and 3 achieved the best inference speed (163.9 frames per second) and detection accuracy (89.1%), respectively. On the other hand, the effect of IBTA was proved by comparing it with the centroid tracking algorithm (CTA), the Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA) and Multiple Object Tracking Precision (MOTP) of IBTA were 12.3% and 6.0% higher than that of CTA, accordingly. In addition, other object-tracking evaluation metrics, including IDF1, IDR, IDP, MT, and IDs, show that IBTA performed better than CTA in strawberry flower and fruit tracking.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.