Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 159 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Line-Separable Weighted Unit-Disk Coverage and Related Problems (2407.00329v1)

Published 29 Jun 2024 in cs.CG and cs.DS

Abstract: Given a set $P$ of $n$ points and a set $S$ of $n$ weighted disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem is to compute a subset of disks of smallest total weight such that the union of the disks in the subset covers all points of $P$. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-separable unit-disk version of the problem where all disks have the same radius and their centers are separated from the points of $P$ by a line $\ell$. We present an $O(n{3/2}\log2 n)$ time algorithm for the problem. This improves the previously best work of $O(n2\log n)$ time. Our result leads to an algorithm of $O(n{{7}/{2}}\log2 n)$ time for the halfplane coverage problem (i.e., using $n$ weighted halfplanes to cover $n$ points), an improvement over the previous $O(n4\log n)$ time solution. If all halfplanes are lower ones, our algorithm runs in $O(n{{3}/{2}}\log2 n)$ time, while the previous best algorithm takes $O(n2\log n)$ time. Using duality, the hitting set problems under the same settings can be solved with similar time complexities.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)