Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Statistical Error Bounds for GANs with Nonlinear Objective Functionals

Published 24 Jun 2024 in stat.ML and cs.LG | (2406.16834v3)

Abstract: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are unsupervised learning methods for training a generator distribution to produce samples that approximate those drawn from a target distribution. Many such methods can be formulated as minimization of a metric or divergence between probability distributions. Recent works have derived statistical error bounds for GANs that are based on integral probability metrics (IPMs), e.g., WGAN which is based on the 1-Wasserstein metric. In general, IPMs are defined by optimizing a linear functional (difference of expectations) over a space of discriminators. A much larger class of GANs, which we here call (f,Γ)(f,\Gamma)-GANs, can be constructed using ff-divergences (e.g., Jensen-Shannon, KL, or α\alpha-divergences) together with a regularizing discriminator space Γ\Gamma (e.g., $1$-Lipschitz functions). These GANs have nonlinear objective functions, depending on the choice of ff, and have been shown to exhibit improved performance in a number of applications. In this work we derive statistical error bounds for (f,Γ)(f,\Gamma)-GANs for general classes of ff and Γ\Gamma in the form of finite-sample concentration inequalities. These results prove the statistical consistency of (f,Γ)(f,\Gamma)-GANs and reduce to the known results for IPM-GANs in the appropriate limit. Our results use novel Rademacher complexity bounds which provide new insight into the performance of IPM-GANs for distributions with unbounded support and have application to statistical learning tasks beyond GANs.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.