Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Superalignment Framework in Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models (2406.05651v1)

Published 9 Jun 2024 in cs.RO, cs.CL, and cs.CV

Abstract: Over the last year, significant advancements have been made in the realms of LLMs and multi-modal LLMs (MLLMs), particularly in their application to autonomous driving. These models have showcased remarkable abilities in processing and interacting with complex information. In autonomous driving, LLMs and MLLMs are extensively used, requiring access to sensitive vehicle data such as precise locations, images, and road conditions. These data are transmitted to an LLM-based inference cloud for advanced analysis. However, concerns arise regarding data security, as the protection against data and privacy breaches primarily depends on the LLM's inherent security measures, without additional scrutiny or evaluation of the LLM's inference outputs. Despite its importance, the security aspect of LLMs in autonomous driving remains underexplored. Addressing this gap, our research introduces a novel security framework for autonomous vehicles, utilizing a multi-agent LLM approach. This framework is designed to safeguard sensitive information associated with autonomous vehicles from potential leaks, while also ensuring that LLM outputs adhere to driving regulations and align with human values. It includes mechanisms to filter out irrelevant queries and verify the safety and reliability of LLM outputs. Utilizing this framework, we evaluated the security, privacy, and cost aspects of eleven LLM-driven autonomous driving cues. Additionally, we performed QA tests on these driving prompts, which successfully demonstrated the framework's efficacy.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper presents a secure multi-agent LLM framework in AD, addressing data leakage, regulatory compliance, and ethical alignment.
  • It employs Behavior Expectation Bounds to quantitatively assess model outputs and sensitive data impacts on driving decisions.
  • Experimental results on the nuScenes-QA dataset show varied performance and safety measures across gpt-35-turbo and llama2-70b models.

A Superalignment Framework in Autonomous Driving with LLMs

The paper "A Superalignment Framework in Autonomous Driving with LLMs" presents a security-oriented framework employing LLMs in the context of autonomous driving (AD). The framework addresses significant risks associated with data security, model alignment, and decision-making in autonomous vehicles. It focuses on safeguarding sensitive information and ensuring compliance with human values and legal standards.

Introduction to LLM Safety in Autonomous Driving

The proposed framework introduces a novel approach by utilizing a multi-agent LLM architecture. This design aims to secure sensitive vehicle-related data, such as precise locations and road conditions, from potential leaks. It also seeks to verify that the outputs generated by LLMs adhere to relevant regulations and align with societal values.

Risks in LLM-driven Autonomous Systems

One of the primary challenges highlighted is the inherent risk of data leakage due to the cloud-based inference mechanisms commonly used in LLM-driven systems. Such systems require the transmission of sensitive data, which introduces vulnerabilities. Moreover, LLMs face challenges such as bias and inaccuracies, which, if unchecked, could have real-world consequences. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: LLM Safety-as-a-service autonomous driving framework.

Key Contributions

The research provides several major contributions to the field of LLM usage in autonomous vehicles, including:

  • A secure interaction framework for LLMs, designed to act as a fail-safe against unintended data exchanges with cloud-based LLMs.
  • An analysis of eleven autonomous driving methods driven by LLM technology, focusing on aspects such as safety, privacy, and alignment with human values.
  • Validation of driving prompts using a section of the nuScenes-QA dataset with comparisons of outcomes between the gpt-35-turbo and llama2-70b LLM backbones.

Methodology

The methodology is driven by Behavior Expectation Bounds (BEB), which quantifies how LLM behaviors align with expected safety and ethical standards. This approach evaluates LLM outputs based on a defined scoring function to measure adherence to safety and alignment requirements. Besides safety, the framework also scrutinizes sensitive data usage and the effectiveness of vehicle command functions.

System Prompts and Data Sensitivity

The system prompts were assessed using various sensitive data integrations to evaluate their impact on LLM-driven decision-making in AD. The inclusion of sensitive data types, such as vehicle speed and location, was analyzed across different models to gauge their influence on decision-making accuracy. Figure 2

Figure 2: LLM-AD system prompt analysis.

Experimental Results

The framework's efficacy was tested through system prompt effectiveness, safety metrics, and alignment scenarios across a selection of LLM-driven autonomous driving methods. These assessments were performed using gpt-35-turbo and llama2-70b-chat LLMs on the nuScenes-QA dataset, covering various environmental perception queries.

Results Overview

The experiments revealed notable differences in performance across different autonomous driving prompts. The analysis indicated variations in sensitive data usage and alignment with human values, which are crucial for evaluating vehicle safety and compliance. Figure 3

Figure 3: LLM-AD system prompt analysis of sensitive data usage.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Overall accuracy in nuScenes-QA dataset.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Results of different models on five question types in nuScenes-QA dataset.

Conclusion

The paper proposes a robust security framework intended to enhance LLM employment in autonomous vehicle systems, emphasizing data safety and ethical alignment. This framework addresses existing vulnerabilities by incorporating a multi-agent safety assessment system, thereby augmenting traditional LLM frameworks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the security measures in promoting safer and more reliable autonomous driving systems.

In summary, this framework provides a comprehensive solution for integrating LLMs into autonomous driving, balancing technological advancement with essential safety and ethical considerations. Future work could explore extending these principles to other high-risk applications of LLMs, ensuring broader applicability and safer AI deployments.