Emergent Mind

On Limitation of Transformer for Learning HMMs

(2406.04089)
Published Jun 6, 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract

Despite the remarkable success of Transformer-based architectures in various sequential modeling tasks, such as natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics, their ability to learn basic sequential models, like Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), is still unclear. This paper investigates the performance of Transformers in learning HMMs and their variants through extensive experimentation and compares them to Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). We show that Transformers consistently underperform RNNs in both training speed and testing accuracy across all tested HMM models. There are even challenging HMM instances where Transformers struggle to learn, while RNNs can successfully do so. Our experiments further reveal the relation between the depth of Transformers and the longest sequence length it can effectively learn, based on the types and the complexity of HMMs. To address the limitation of transformers in modeling HMMs, we demonstrate that a variant of the Chain-of-Thought (CoT), called $\textit{block CoT}$ in the training phase, can help transformers to reduce the evaluation error and to learn longer sequences at a cost of increasing the training time. Finally, we complement our empirical findings by theoretical results proving the expressiveness of transformers in approximating HMMs with logarithmic depth.

Evaluation loss of RNNs and Transformers at specific sequence lengths for 4 tasks.

Overview

  • The paper investigates the limitations of Transformer models in learning Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), particularly when compared to Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Empirical experiments reveal that Transformers struggle with structured HMMs and require more depth to achieve similar accuracy as RNNs.

  • RNNs outperform Transformers in both training speed and testing accuracy across various HMM tasks. Transformers exhibit higher prediction loss in specific instances and need more hyperparameter tuning.

  • The research introduces a variant of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, referred to as block CoT, to mitigate these limitations. This approach allows Transformers to manage longer sequences but increases computational demands.

On the Limitation of Transformers for Learning HMMs

The paper "On Limitation of Transformer for Learning HMMs" investigates the ability of Transformer models to learn Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), comparing their performance to Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Despite the notable success of Transformers in various sequential modeling tasks, the paper highlights the limitations of Transformers when applied to learning HMMs.

Summary of Findings

The findings presented in this paper are derived from extensive empirical experiments on both random and structured HMM instances. The key outcomes can be summarized as follows:

  1. Effectiveness in Learning HMM Models:

    • Random HMMs: Transformers can effectively learn belief state inference tasks when the training data includes true beliefs at each step. However, for next-observation prediction tasks, there are challenging instances where Transformers exhibit high prediction loss.
    • Structured HMMs: In structured HMMs with slow mixing speed and long history dependency, Transformers underperform compared to RNNs. Interestingly, Transformers tend to require considerably more depth to achieve comparable accuracy.
  2. Comparison with RNNs:

    • Training Speed: RNNs consistently outperform Transformers in training speed across all tested models.
    • Testing Accuracy: RNNs achieve lower testing errors and exhibit greater robustness in hyperparameter tuning and curriculum scheduling.
  3. Depth vs. Sequence Length:

    • Constant Depth: Simple HMMs like random HMMs and Linear Dynamical Systems (LDS) can be effectively learned by Transformers of constant depth, independent of sequence length.
    • Logarithmic Scaling: For more complex models like structured HMMs, the minimal depth required for Transformers shows an approximate logarithmic dependency on the sequence length.
    • Hard Instances: Certain HMM instances, constructed intentionally to be difficult, challenge Transformers even at constant sequence lengths.

Methodological Insights

The paper proposes a variant of the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, termed block CoT, to mitigate some limitations of Transformers:

  • Block CoT Training: Training with block CoT involves feeding the output of Transformers back to themselves every $b$ tokens. This method integrates a recursive inductive bias within the architecture, significantly reducing evaluation error and enabling shallow Transformers to handle longer sequences. However, this approach increases the computational demands, thus slowing down the training process.

Theoretical Contributions

Complementary to the empirical findings, the paper provides theoretical results that elucidate the expressiveness of Transformers in approximating HMMs:

  • Expressiveness of Transformers: Theoretical findings prove that an $L$-layer finite precision Transformer can fit any HMMs of at least $2L$ sequence length. This conclusion aligns with the experimental observation of logarithmic scaling between Transformer depth and sequence length for more complex HMMs.

Implications and Future Work

Practical Implications:

  • The limitations of Transformers in learning highly structured HMMs suggest potential challenges in applying Transformer-based architectures in reinforcement learning environments, particularly those characterized by slow mixing speeds and uninformative observations.
  • The enhanced performance of RNNs in these contexts reaffirms the importance of selecting appropriate architectures based on the specific characteristics of the sequential data being modeled.

Theoretical Implications:

  • Understanding the depth vs. sequence length trade-off in Transformers provides valuable insights into their architectural design and potential areas for improvement.
  • The development of block CoT demonstrates a viable approach to enhance Transformer performance at a computational cost, highlighting a trade-off between model complexity and training efficiency.

Future Developments:

  • Future research could focus on further refining CoT techniques to balance performance gains with computational efficiency.
  • Exploring hybrid architectures that combine the strengths of RNNs and Transformers may offer a promising direction to address the limitations observed in purely Transformer-based models.

In conclusion, the paper underscores the inherent limitations of Transformer models in learning HMMs, providing both empirical evidence and theoretical insights. The proposed block CoT technique and detailed comparisons with RNNs offer a roadmap for future research to optimize Transformer performance in HMM-like data and beyond.

Create an account to read this summary for free:

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.