Emergent Mind

The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models

(2406.01506)
Published Jun 3, 2024 in cs.CL , cs.AI , cs.LG , and stat.ML

Abstract

Understanding how semantic meaning is encoded in the representation spaces of LLMs is a fundamental problem in interpretability. In this paper, we study the two foundational questions in this area. First, how are categorical concepts, such as {'mammal', 'bird', 'reptile', 'fish'}, represented? Second, how are hierarchical relations between concepts encoded? For example, how is the fact that 'dog' is a kind of 'mammal' encoded? We show how to extend the linear representation hypothesis to answer these questions. We find a remarkably simple structure: simple categorical concepts are represented as simplices, hierarchically related concepts are orthogonal in a sense we make precise, and (in consequence) complex concepts are represented as polytopes constructed from direct sums of simplices, reflecting the hierarchical structure. We validate these theoretical results on the Gemma large language model, estimating representations for 957 hierarchically related concepts using data from WordNet.

Hierarchically related categorical concepts form nested simplices in large language models' representation space.

Overview

  • Park et al. analyze how categorical and hierarchical concepts are geometrically represented in LLMs, highlighting the linear encoding of high-level semantic concepts.

  • They demonstrate that hierarchical relationships are geometrically encoded as orthogonality, with empirical validation using the Gemma LLM and data from WordNet to confirm their findings.

  • The study provides a framework for representing categorical variables as polytopes and discusses future directions for improving semantic interpretability, internal layer geometry exploration, and efficient hyperbolic representations.

The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in LLMs

In their study on the geometric representation of semantic meaning in LLMs, Park et al. investigate the fundamental questions concerning the representation of categorical and hierarchical concepts within these models. Understanding the internal representation of these high-level semantic concepts is crucial for the interpretability and control of LLMs.

Key Contributions

This paper addresses how categorical concepts, such as {mammal, bird, reptile, fish}, are represented and how hierarchical relations between these concepts, e.g., how 'dog' being a subset of 'mammal', are encoded. The study builds on the linear representation hypothesis that posits high-level concepts are linearly encoded in the representation spaces of LLMs.

Revamping Linear Representations:

  • The authors extend the previous notion of linear representation of binary concepts as directions to the representation as vectors. This transformation allows for the composition of representations using vector operations.

Hierarchical Orthogonality:

  • They demonstrate that the hierarchical relationships between concepts are encoded geometrically as orthogonality in the representation space. Specifically, they show that subordinate concepts reside in orthogonal subspaces relative to their superordinate category.

Representation of Categorical Concepts:

  • The paper introduces a framework to represent categorical variables as polytopes, with representations of natural concepts forming a simplex. For example, the concept of 'animal' is represented by the convex hull of the vector representations of its subcategories (mammal, bird, reptile, fish).

Empirical Validation:

  • The theoretical outcomes are empirically validated on the Gemma large language model by estimating representations for 957 hierarchically related concepts using data from WordNet.

Experimental Setup and Findings

Canonical Representation Space

To align the embedding and unembedding representations, the authors use a canonical transformation, which ensures the Euclidean inner product becomes a causal inner product. This transformation is crucial for employing vector operations with semantic fidelity in the unified space.

WordNet Hierarchy Analysis

Existence of Vector Representations:

  • Using WordNet to define a comprehensive set of binary features, the authors verify the existence of vector representations. They employ Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to estimate vector representations and confirm that projected test word vectors agree with theoretical properties.

Hierarchical Orthogonality:

  • The cosine similarity between the vector representations of concepts reveals that WordNet's hierarchical structure is mirrored in the representation space. Parent-child and child-grandparent vectors are shown to be orthogonal, validating the theoretical predictions.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings of this research lay substantial theoretical groundwork for interpretability in AI. The results not only reinforce the existence of linear representations but also elucidate how hierarchical semantic structures are geometrically encoded in LLMs. These insights point to several future research avenues:

Hierarchical Semantic Interpretability:

  • Current interpretability models should be revised to account for hierarchical semantics. Methods should respect the orthogonal direct sum structure of categorical variables to ensure clean separability and interpretability.

Internal Layer Geometry:

  • While the study focuses on final layer representations, it opens up questions about the geometric structure within internal layers. Investigations into canonical transformations for internal layers could yield deeper insights.

Efficient Hyperbolic Representations:

  • Given the observed simplex structure for categorical concepts, exploring hyperbolic geometries for more efficient LLM representations could be promising.

This comprehensive inquiry into the geometric representation of hierarchical and categorical concepts within LLMs provides foundational insights that may drive significant advancements in the design and interpretability of intelligent systems. By establishing a clear connection between vector space operations and semantic structures, Park et al. propel the broader research agenda in understanding and manipulating the internal representations of language models.

Create an account to read this summary for free:

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.