Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An optimal chromatic bound for ($P_2+P_3$, gem)-free graphs (2405.17819v1)

Published 28 May 2024 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: Given a graph $G$, the parameters $\chi(G)$ and $\omega(G)$ respectively denote the chromatic number and the clique number of $G$. A function $f : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that $f(1) = 1$ and $f(x) \geq x$, for all $x \in \mathbb{N}$ is called a $\chi$-binding function for the given class of graphs $\cal{G}$ if every $G \in \cal{G}$ satisfies $\chi(G) \leq f(\omega(G))$, and the \emph{smallest $\chi$-binding function} $f*$ for $\cal{G}$ is defined as $f*(x) := \max{\chi(G)\mid G\in {\cal G} \mbox{ and } \omega(G)=x}$. In general, the problem of obtaining the smallest $\chi$-binding function for the given class of graphs seems to be extremely hard, and only a few classes of graphs are studied in this direction. In this paper, we study the class of ($P_2+ P_3$, gem)-free graphs, and prove that the function $\phi:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ defined by $\phi(1)=1$, $\phi(2)=4$, $\phi(3)=6$ and $\phi(x)=\left\lceil\frac{1}{4}(5x-1)\right\rceil$, for $x\geq 4$ is the smallest $\chi$-binding function for the class of ($P_2+ P_3$, gem)-free graphs.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)