Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Bi-Objective Approach to Last-Mile Delivery Routing Considering Driver Preferences (2405.16051v1)

Published 25 May 2024 in cs.AI and cs.LG

Abstract: The Multi-Objective Vehicle Routing Problem (MOVRP) is a complex optimization problem in the transportation and logistics industry. This paper proposes a novel approach to the MOVRP that aims to create routes that consider drivers' and operators' decisions and preferences. We evaluate two approaches to address this objective: visually attractive route planning and data mining of historical driver behavior to plan similar routes. Using a real-world dataset provided by Amazon, we demonstrate that data mining of historical patterns is more effective than visual attractiveness metrics found in the literature. Furthermore, we propose a bi-objective problem to balance the similarity of routes to historical routes and minimize routing costs. We propose a two-stage GRASP algorithm with heuristic box splitting to solve this problem. The proposed algorithm aims to approximate the Pareto front and to present routes that cover a wide range of the objective function space. The results demonstrate that our approach can generate a small number of non-dominated solutions per instance, which can help decision-makers to identify trade-offs between routing costs and drivers' preferences. Our approach has the potential to enhance the last-mile delivery operations of logistics companies by balancing these conflicting objectives.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Toth P, Vigo D. Vehicle routing: problems, methods, and applications. Vigo D, Toth P, editors, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2014. https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611973594.
  2. Tang H, Miller-Hooks E. Interactive Heuristic for Practical Vehicle Routing Problem with Solution Shape Constraints. Transportation Research Record 2006;1964(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106196400102.
  3. Matis P. Decision support system for solving the street routing problem. Transport 2008;23(3):230–235.
  4. Visual attractiveness in routing problems: A review. Computers & Operations Research 2019;103:13–34.
  5. Visual attractiveness in vehicle routing via bi-objective optimization. Computers & Operations Research 2022;137:105507.
  6. Krumm J. A markov model for driver turn prediction. In: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) 2008 World Congress, April 2008; 2008. .
  7. Decision-making process and factors affecting truck routing. In: Freight Transport Modelling Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013.
  8. Building efficient probability transition matrix using machine learning from big data for personalized route prediction. Procedia Computer Science 2015;53:284–291.
  9. Navigation made personal: Inferring driving preferences from gps traces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems; 2015. p. 1–9.
  10. Canoy R, Guns T. Vehicle routing by learning from historical solutions. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming Springer; 2019. p. 54–70.
  11. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge. MIT Libraries; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131235.
  12. A two-stage data-driven metaheuristic to predict last-mile delivery route sequences. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2023;125:106653. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197623008370.
  13. Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge; 2021. https://routingchallenge.mit.edu/.
  14. A Data-Driven Metaheuristic Approach to Predict Delivery Route Sequences. In: Winkenbach M, Parks S, Noszek J, editors. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge MIT Libraries; 2021. p. VIII.1–VIII.12.
  15. Local Search with Learned Constraints for Last Mile Routing. In: Winkenbach M, Parks S, Noszek J, editors. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge MIT Libraries; 2021. p. XXI.1–XXI.12.
  16. TSP with Learned Zone Preferences for Last-Mile Vehicle Dispatching. In: Winkenbach M, Parks S, Noszek J, editors. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge MIT Libraries; 2021. p. XXX.1–XXX.9.
  17. 2021 Amazon last mile routing research challenge: Data set. Transportation Science 2022;https://www.amazon.science/publications/2021-amazon-last-mile-routing-research-challenge-data-set.
  18. Pareto V. Cours d’économie politique, vol. 1. Librairie Droz; 1964.
  19. https://ctl.mit.edu/pub/thesis/learning-route-plan-deviation-last-mile-delivery.
  20. Combining Markov model and prediction by partial matching compression technique for route and destination prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems 2018;154:81–92.
  21. Last-Mile Delivery Trajectory Prediction Using Hierarchical TSP with Customized Cost Matrix. In: Winkenbach M, Parks S, Noszek J, editors. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge MIT Libraries; 2021. p. II.1–II.12.
  22. Arslan O, Abay R. Data-Driven Vehicle Routing in Last-Mile Delivery. In: Winkenbach M, Parks S, Noszek J, editors. Technical Proceedings of the Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge MIT Libraries; 2021. p. VI.1–VI.14.
  23. Multi-objective vehicle routing problems. European journal of operational research 2008;189(2):293–309.
  24. An improved multi-directional local search algorithm for the multi-objective consistent vehicle routing problem. IIE Transactions 2016;48(10):975–992.
  25. Constrained local search for last-mile routing. Transportation Science 2022;.
  26. Mladenović N, Hansen P. Variable neighborhood search. Computers & operations research 1997;24(11):1097–1100.
  27. Coca-Cola Enterprises optimizes vehicle routes for efficient product delivery. Interfaces 2008;38(1):40–50.
  28. A savings based method for real-life vehicle routing problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2002;53(1):57–68.
  29. Gretton C, Kilby P. A study of shape penalties in vehicle routing. In: VIII Triennial Symposium on Transportation Analysis. San Pedro de Atacama, Chile; 2013. .
  30. Bentley JL. Multidimensional Binary Search Trees Used for Associative Searching. Commun ACM 1975 Sep;18(9):509–517.
  31. Leveraging single-objective heuristics to solve bi-objective problems: heuristic box splitting and its application to vehicle routing. Networks 2019;73(4):382–400.
  32. Boost C++ Libraries; 2022. http://www.boost.org/.
  33. Levenshtein VI, et al. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In: Soviet physics doklady, vol. 10 Soviet Union; 1966. p. 707–710. https://nymity.ch/sybilhunting/pdf/Levenshtein1966a.pdf.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets