Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Low-latency Symbol-Synchronous Communication for Multi-hop Sensor Networks (2405.10063v1)

Published 16 May 2024 in cs.NI

Abstract: Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have received great interest due to their scalability, energy efficiency, and low-cost deployment. By utilizing multi-hop communication, WSNs can cover a wide area using low transmission power without the need for any communication infrastructure. Traditionally, WSNs rely on store-and-forward routing protocols and Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA)-based schedules that avoid interference between different wireless nodes. However, emerging challenging scenarios, such as the industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and robotic swarms, impose strict latency and reliability requirements, which traditional approaches cannot fulfill. In this paper, we propose a novel symbol-synchronous transmission design that provides reliable low-latency communication with a reasonable data rate on classical sub-6GHz RF frequency bands (e.g., the 2.4GHz ISM band). Instead of avoiding overlapping transmissions, the proposed scheme benefits from concurrent transmissions. Using simulation in MATLAB, we prove that the proposed design allows achieving a wire-like delay of 5ms for a 512-bit packet over multiple hops with only a 0.3% latency increase per extra hop and a low bit error rate (BER) of 0.04%. Compared to similar state-of-the-art approaches it can achieve a significantly higher data rate of 100kbps, which is expected to increase further with future improvements of the system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. A. Sharma and R. Sharma, “A Review of Applications, Approaches, and Challenges in Internet of Things (IoT),” in Proceedings of ICRIC 2019, P. K. Singh, A. K. Kar, Y. Singh, M. H. Kolekar, and S. Tanwar, Eds.   Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 257–269.
  2. M. A. Siddiqi, H. Yu, and J. Joung, “5G Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication Implementation Challenges and Operational Issues with IoT Devices,” Electronics, vol. 8, no. 9, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/8/9/981
  3. N. K. Gupta, R. S. Yadav, R. K. Nagaria, D. Gupta, A. M. Tripathi, and O. J. Pandey, “Anchor-Based Void Detouring Routing Protocol in Three Dimensional IoT Networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 227, p. 109691, 2023.
  4. H. Badis and A. Rachedi, “Modeling Tools to Evaluate the Performance of Wireless Multi-Hop Networks,” in Modeling and Simulation of Computer Networks and Systems.   Elsevier, 2015, pp. 653–682.
  5. C. Coletti and K. Williams, “Real-Time Control Interface for Research and Development Using Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Mobile Robotics and UAVs,” in AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024, p. 0235.
  6. M. O. Farooq, C. J. Sreenan, K. N. Brown, and T. Kunz, “RPL-based Routing Protocols for Multi-Sink Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 2015, pp. 452–459.
  7. A. Karaagac, J. Haxhibeqiri, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “Time-Critical Communication in 6TiSCH Networks,” in 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2018, pp. 161–166.
  8. N. M. Ben Lakhal, O. Nasri, L. Adouane, and J. B. Hadj Slama, “Controller Area Network Reliability: Overview of Design Challenges and Safety Related Perspectives of Future Transportation Systems,” IET Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1727–1739, 2020.
  9. F. Ferrari, M. Zimmerling, L. Thiele, and O. Saukh, “Efficient Network Flooding and Time Synchronization with Glossy,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.   IEEE, 2011, pp. 73–84.
  10. J. Oostvogels, F. Yang, S. Michiels, and D. Hughes, “Zero-Wire: a Deterministic and Low-Latency Wireless Bus through Symbol-Synchronous Transmission of Optical Signals,” in Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2020, pp. 164–178.
  11. M. Zimmerling, L. Mottola, and S. Santini, “Synchronous Transmissions in Low-Power Wireless: A Survey of Communication Protocols and Network Services,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1–39, 2020.
  12. B. A. Nahas, A. Escobar-Molero, J. Klaue, S. Duquennoy, and O. Landsiedel, “BlueFlood: Concurrent Transmissions for Multi-Hop Bluetooth 5—Modeling and Evaluation,” ACM Transactions on Internet of Things, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–30, 2021.
  13. J. Cheng, P. Yang, K. Navaie, Q. Ni, and H. Yang, “A low-latency interference coordinated routing for wireless multi-hop networks,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 8679–8690, 2021.
  14. F. Sutton, B. Buchli, J. Beutel, and L. Thiele, “Zippy: On-demand Network Flooding,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2015, pp. 45–58.
  15. A. W. Mbugua, Y. Chen, L. Raschkowski, L. Thiele, S. Jaeckel, and W. Fan, “Review on Ray Tracing Channel Simulation Accuracy in Sub-6 GHz Outdoor Deployment Scenarios,” IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2, pp. 22–37, 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com