Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 155 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 422 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Eco-driving Accounting for Interactive Cut-in Vehicles (2405.05353v1)

Published 8 May 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Automated vehicles can gather information about surrounding traffic and plan safe and energy-efficient driving behavior, which is known as eco-driving. Conventional eco-driving designs only consider preceding vehicles in the same lane as the ego vehicle. In heavy traffic, however, vehicles in adjacent lanes may cut into the ego vehicle's lane, influencing the ego vehicle's eco-driving behavior and compromising the energy-saving performance. Therefore, in this paper, we propose an eco-driving design that accounts for neighbor vehicles that have cut-in intentions. Specifically, we integrate a leader-follower game to predict the interaction between the ego and the cut-in vehicles and a model-predictive controller for planning energy-efficient behavior for the automated ego vehicle. We show that the leader-follower game model can reasonably represent the interactive motion between the ego vehicle and the cut-in vehicle. More importantly, we show that the proposed design can predict and react to neighbor vehicles' cut-in behaviors properly, leading to improved energy efficiency in cut-in scenarios compared to baseline designs that consider preceding vehicles only.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “The Monthly Energy Review ,” U.S. Department of Energy, Tech. Rep., Dec 2023.
  2. B. Saltsman, “Impacts of connectivity and automation on vehicle operations,” in Global Symposium on Connected Vehicle and Infrastructure, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2014.
  3. C. R. He, H. Maurer, and G. Orosz, “Fuel consumption optimization of heavy-duty vehicles with grade, wind, and traffic information,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 061011, 2016.
  4. A. Sciarretta, G. De Nunzio, and L. L. Ojeda, “Optimal ecodriving control: Energy-efficient driving of road vehicles as an optimal control problem,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 71–90, 2015.
  5. C. R. He, J. I. Ge, and G. Orosz, “Fuel efficient connected cruise control for heavy-duty trucks in real traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2474–2481, 2020.
  6. L. Bertoni, J. Guanetti, M. Basso, M. Masoero, S. Cetinkunt, and F. Borrelli, “An adaptive cruise control for connected energy-saving electric vehicles,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2359–2364, 2017, 20th IFAC World Congress.
  7. S. Tsugawa, S. Jeschke, and S. E. Shladover, “A review of truck platooning projects for energy savings,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–77, 2016.
  8. Y. Bian, C. Du, M. Hu, S. E. Li, H. Liu, and C. Li, “Fuel economy optimization for platooning vehicle swarms via distributed economic model predictive control,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 1–13., 2021.
  9. Q. Lin, S. E. Li, X. Du, X. Zhang, H. Peng, Y. Luo, and K. Li, “Minimize the fuel consumption of connected vehicles between two red-signalized intersections in urban traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 9060–9072, 2018.
  10. V. Jayawardana and C. Wu, “Learning eco-driving strategies at signalized intersections,” in European Control Conference (ECC), 2022, pp. 383–390.
  11. M. Shen, R. A. Dollar, T. G. Molnar, C. R. He, A. Vahidi, and G. Orosz, “Energy-efficient reactive and predictive connected cruise control,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. published online, pp. 1–14, 2023.
  12. A. Voronov, J. Andersson, and C. Englund, “Cut-ins in truck platoons: Modeling loss of fuel savings,” in Towards Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Highways: Technical, Security and Social Challenges.   Springer, 2020, pp. 11–26.
  13. S. He, S. Wang, Y. Shao, Z. Sun, and M. W. Levin, “Real-time traffic prediction considering lane changing maneuvers with application to eco-driving control of electric vehicles,” in 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2023, pp. 1–7.
  14. Z. Gu, Y. Yin, S. E. Li, J. Duan, F. Zhang, S. Zheng, and R. Yang, “Integrated eco-driving automation of intelligent vehicles in multi-lane scenario via model-accelerated reinforcement learning,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 144, p. 103863, 2022.
  15. Y. Liang, H. Dong, D. Li, and Z. Song, “Adaptive eco-cruising control for connected electric vehicles considering a dynamic preceding vehicle,” eTransportation, vol. 19, p. 100299, 2024.
  16. T. Ersal, I. Kolmanovsky, N. Masoud, N. Ozay, J. Scruggs, R. Vasudevan, and G. Orosz, “Connected and automated road vehicles: State of the art and future challenges,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 672–704, 2020.
  17. N. Li, Y. Yao, I. Kolmanovsky, E. Atkins, and A. R. Girard, “Game-theoretic modeling of multi-vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1428–1442, 2022.
  18. K. Liu, N. Li, H. Eric Tseng, I. Kolmanovsky, and A. Girard, “Interaction-Aware Trajectory Prediction and Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Forced Merge Scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 474–488, 2023.
  19. K. Ji, N. Li, M. Orsag, and K. Han, “Hierarchical and game-theoretic decision-making for connected and automated vehicles in overtaking scenarios,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 150, p. 104109, 2023.
  20. I. Hwang, H. Balakrishnan, and C. Tomlin, “State estimation for hybrid systems: applications to aircraft tracking,” IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications, vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 556–566, 2006.
  21. J. Löfberg, “YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB,” in IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design (CACSD), 2004.
  22. Gurobi Optimization, LLC, “Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube