Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

DeepDamageNet: A two-step deep-learning model for multi-disaster building damage segmentation and classification using satellite imagery (2405.04800v1)

Published 8 May 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Satellite imagery has played an increasingly important role in post-disaster building damage assessment. Unfortunately, current methods still rely on manual visual interpretation, which is often time-consuming and can cause very low accuracy. To address the limitations of manual interpretation, there has been a significant increase in efforts to automate the process. We present a solution that performs the two most important tasks in building damage assessment, segmentation and classification, through deep-learning models. We show our results submitted as part of the xView2 Challenge, a competition to design better models for identifying buildings and their damage level after exposure to multiple kinds of natural disasters. Our best model couples a building identification semantic segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN) to a building damage classification CNN, with a combined F1 score of 0.66, surpassing the xView2 challenge baseline F1 score of 0.28. We find that though our model was able to identify buildings with relatively high accuracy, building damage classification across various disaster types is a difficult task due to the visual similarity between different damage levels and different damage distribution between disaster types, highlighting the fact that it may be important to have a probabilistic prior estimate regarding disaster damage in order to obtain accurate predictions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Crowdsourcing earthquake damage assessment using remote sensing imagery. Annals of Geophysics, 54(6), 2012.
  2. Monitoring and evaluating post-disaster recovery using high-resolution satellite imagery—towards standardised indicators for post-disaster recovery. Martin Centre: Cambridge, UK, 2015.
  3. The role of remote sensing in earthquake science and engineering: Opportunities and challenges. Earthquake Spectra, 24(2):471–492, 2008.
  4. A comprehensive review of earthquake-induced building damage detection with remote sensing techniques. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 84:85–99, 2013.
  5. The capabilities of earth observation to contribute along the risk cycle. In Earthquake Hazard, Risk and Disasters, pages 25–53. Elsevier, 2014.
  6. Remote sensing-based proxies for urban disaster risk management and resilience: A review. Remote sensing, 10(11):1760, 2018.
  7. The Development and Uses of Crowdsourced Building Damage Information based on Remote-Sensing. Technical Report 1, 2018. URL https://purl.stanford.edu/bj915mt6570.
  8. Towards real-time building damage mapping with low-cost UAV solutions. Remote Sensing, 11(3):1–14, 2019. ISSN 20724292. doi:10.3390/rs11030287.
  9. Creating xbd: A dataset for assessing building damage from satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 10–17, 2019.
  10. H Th Verstappen. Aerospace technology and natural disaster reduction. Advances in Space Research, 15(11):3–15, 1995.
  11. Satellite remote sensing of earthquake, volcano, flood, landslide and coastal inundation hazards. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 59(4):185–198, 2005.
  12. A segmentation and classification approach of ikonos-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment. International Journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 4(3):217–229, 2003.
  13. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015.
  14. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117–2125, 2017.
  15. Aerial imagery for roof segmentation: A large-scale dataset towards automatic mapping of buildings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09532, 2018a.
  16. Masklab: Instance segmentation by refining object detection with semantic and direction features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4013–4022, 2018b.
  17. Ternausnetv2: Fully convolutional network for instance segmentation. In CVPR Workshops, pages 233–237, 2018.
  18. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017.
  19. Sharada Prasanna Mohanty. Crowdai mapping challenge 2018 : Baseline with mask rcnn. https://github.com/crowdai/crowdai-mapping-challenge-mask-rcnn, 2018.
  20. Building damage detection in satellite imagery using convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06444, 2019.
  21. Multi3net: segmenting flooded buildings via fusion of multiresolution, multisensor, and multitemporal satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 702–709, 2019.
  22. Detectron2. https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2, 2019.
  23. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  24. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 91–99, 2015.
  25. Imantics. Image semantics documentation. https://imantics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#, 2019.
  26. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004.
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a two-step model that decouples building segmentation and damage classification, achieving a mean IoU of 0.85.
  • It demonstrates that integrating disaster-specific features boosts classification accuracy, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 compared to benchmark scores.
  • The study underscores the model’s potential for rapid post-disaster assessments by adapting to diverse geographic and disaster conditions.

DeepDamageNet: A Two-step Deep-learning Model for Multi-disaster Building Damage Segmentation and Classification Using Satellite Imagery

Introduction

The paper "DeepDamageNet: A Two-step Deep-learning Model for Multi-disaster Building Damage Segmentation and Classification Using Satellite Imagery" proposes a novel approach for automating building damage assessments post-disaster using satellite imagery. Traditional methods largely depend on manual visual interpretation and field surveys, which are time-consuming and error-prone. The authors address these limitations by developing a two-step deep-learning model to perform semantic segmentation and damage classification of buildings affected by natural disasters.

Dataset Overview

The xBD dataset is utilized, containing over 2799 pairs of pre- and post-disaster satellite images sourced from DigitalGlobe with 0.5m resolution. Each image pair is annotated with ground truth building polygons and damage levels ranging from no damage (0) to destroyed (3). The dataset encompasses various types of disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires, collected from diverse geographic locations. Figure 1

Figure 1: Pre-disaster (left) and its corresponding post-disaster satellite image.

Model Architecture

The paper introduces two primary model architectures: a two-step model and an end-to-end model.

  1. Two-step Model: This model decouples building segmentation and damage classification into sequential tasks. Initially, a semantic segmentation model identifies building footprints, followed by a CNN-based classification model evaluating damage extent. The segmentation model utilizes a ResNet-50 FPN, while the classification model employs a twin-tower ResNet-50 architecture. Figure 2

    Figure 2: Architecture of two-step model. The pre-disaster image is fed into a segmentation model to obtain building polygon coordinates. This result in addition to pre- and post- disaster cropped building image is then fed into a damage classification model to obtain the final image.

  2. End-to-End Model: This architecture employs a pre-trained U-Net with ResNet-34 encoder to simultaneously segment and classify damage. It inputs the difference between pre- and post-disaster images to directly predict damage levels. Figure 3

    Figure 3: Architecture of end-to-end model. The pre- and disaster image is subtracted before feeding into a U-Net to perform simultaneous segmentation and classification.

Experiments and Results

The results demonstrate that the two-step model outperforms the end-to-end model in both segmentation and classification tasks. For instance, the semantic segmentation model achieved a mean IoU of 0.85, surpassing the instance segmentation alternative. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Instance segmentation results on validation set.

In damage classification, incorporating disaster-specific features into the model improved accuracy significantly. The best-performing model yielded a combined F1 score of 0.66, which exceeded the xView2 challenge baseline F1 score of 0.28. Figure 5

Figure 5: Validation results of correct damage classification predictions.

Challenges noted include significant visual similarity across damage types and discrepancies in building densities affecting model accuracy.

Conclusion

The paper provides substantial evidence supporting the efficacy of using deep learning for automated building damage assessment. It suggests future work may involve integrating probabilistic prior estimates for disaster severity to refine damage predictions. The implications for real-world applications underline the need for deploying adaptable, generalized models capable of accommodating diverse disaster types and geographic variations.

In conclusion, "DeepDamageNet" offers a compelling solution to the challenges of rapid and accurate post-disaster assessment, paving the way for improved response strategies and resource management in the aftermath of natural catastrophes.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube