Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
104 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
40 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Language Modeling Using Tensor Trains (2405.04590v1)

Published 7 May 2024 in cs.CL and cs.IR

Abstract: We propose a novel tensor network LLM based on the simplest tensor network (i.e., tensor trains), called `Tensor Train LLM' (TTLM). TTLM represents sentences in an exponential space constructed by the tensor product of words, but computing the probabilities of sentences in a low-dimensional fashion. We demonstrate that the architectures of Second-order RNNs, Recurrent Arithmetic Circuits (RACs), and Multiplicative Integration RNNs are, essentially, special cases of TTLM. Experimental evaluations on real LLMing tasks show that the proposed variants of TTLM (i.e., TTLM-Large and TTLM-Tiny) outperform the vanilla Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with low-scale of hidden units. (The code is available at https://github.com/shuishen112/tensortrainlm.)

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. Exact holographic tensor networks for the motzkin spin chain. Quantum, 5:546, 2021.
  2. A maximum likelihood approach to continuous speech recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, (2):179–190, 1983.
  3. Parameterized machine learning for high-energy physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07913, 2016.
  4. Chapter 1 - tensor decompositions: computations, applications, and challenges. In Liu, Y. (ed.), Tensors for Data Processing, pp.  1–30. Academic Press, 2022.
  5. Bridle, J. S. Probabilistic interpretation of feedforward classification network outputs, with relationships to statistical pattern recognition. In Neurocomputing, pp.  227–236. Springer, 1990.
  6. Convolutional rectifier networks as generalized tensor decompositions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  955–963. PMLR, 2016.
  7. On the expressive power of deep learning: A tensor analysis. In Conference on learning theory, pp.  698–728. PMLR, 2016.
  8. UCI machine learning repository, 2017. URL https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Individual+household+electric+power+consumption.
  9. Reservoir computing compensates slow response of chemosensor arrays exposed to fast varying gas concentrations in continuous monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 215:618–629, 2015.
  10. Deep learning, volume 1. MIT Press, 2016.
  11. First-order versus second-order single-layer recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(3):511–513, 1994.
  12. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
  13. Mining pure high-order word associations via information geometry for information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 31(3):1–32, 2013.
  14. Itskov, M. Tensor Algebra and Tensor Analysis for Engineers: With Applications to Continuum Mechanics. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2nd edition, 2009. ISBN 3540939067.
  15. Expressive power of recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  16. Tensor regression networks. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):4862–4882, 2020.
  17. Benefits of depth for long-term memory of recurrent networks. 2018.
  18. Critical behavior from deep dynamics: a hidden dimension in natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06737, 2016.
  19. Marcinkiewicz, M. A. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Using Large Corpora, 273, 1994.
  20. Marcus, G. F. Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive psychology, 37(3):243–282, 1998.
  21. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001, volume 2, pp.  416–423. IEEE, 2001.
  22. Language modeling with a general second-order rnn. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp.  4749–4753, 2020.
  23. Language model evaluation beyond perplexity. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  5328–5339, Online, August 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Pointer sentinel mixture models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07843, 2016.
  25. Context dependent recurrent neural network language model. In 2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), pp.  234–239. IEEE, 2012.
  26. Tensor networks for probabilistic sequence modeling. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  3079–3087. PMLR, 2021.
  27. Are biological systems poised at criticality? Journal of Statistical Physics, 144(2):268–302, 2011.
  28. Tensorizing neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  29. Exponential machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.03795, 2016.
  30. Tensor-train density estimation. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp.  1321–1331. PMLR, 2021.
  31. Oseledets, I. V. Tensor-train decomposition. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33(5):2295–2317, 2011.
  32. Tensor network language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10248, 2017.
  33. Language as a matrix product state. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.01416, 2017.
  34. Using the output embedding to improve language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05859, 2016.
  35. Connecting weighted automata and recurrent neural networks through spectral learning. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  1630–1639. PMLR, 2019.
  36. Radev, D. Clair collection of fraud email, acl data and code repository. ADCR2008T001, 2008.
  37. Rendle, S. Factorization machines. In 2010 IEEE International conference on data mining, pp.  995–1000. IEEE, 2010.
  38. Boosted decision trees as an alternative to artificial neural networks for particle identification. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 543(2-3):577–584, 2005.
  39. Supervised learning with tensor networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 2016.
  40. Generating text with recurrent neural networks. In ICML, 2011.
  41. Criticality in large-scale brain fmri dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Frontiers in physiology, 3:15, 2012.
  42. Tomita, M. Dynamic construction of finite-state automata from examples using hill-climbing. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.  105–108, 1982.
  43. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  44. Werbos, P. J. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10):1550–1560, 1990.
  45. An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories. Neural computation, 2(4):490–501, 1990.
  46. On multiplicative integration with recurrent neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  47. A generalized language model in tensor space. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pp.  7450–7458, 2019.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel Tensor Train Language Model that leverages tensor train decompositions to efficiently compute sentence probabilities and reduce model complexity, outperforming traditional RNNs on perplexity benchmarks.
  • The methodology employs two variants, TTLM-Large and TTLM-Tiny, offering a trade-off between capturing complex patterns and mitigating overfitting based on dataset size.
  • The findings suggest that tensor network structures have strong potential to revolutionize language modeling by enabling more scalable and efficient architectures compared to conventional methods.

Exploring Tensor Train LLMs

Introduction to Tensor Networks in LLMing

Tensor networks have been around in the domain of physics and mathematics for a while, helping to simplify complex systems of interactions into more manageable subproblems. Recently, this concept has been transported into LLMing. How? Well, a tensor network decomposes a complex, high-dimensional tensor into less intimidating, smaller tensors without losing crucial information.

The paper we're diving into today extends this idea to NLP, proposing a LLM that leverages tensor trains, one of the simplest forms of tensor networks. This proposed model, dubbed the Tensor Train LLM (TTLM), aims to offer a fresh way of processing language that potentially improves on traditional Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs).

What’s So Special About TTLM?

Tensor Train LLMs (TTLM) use a structure known as tensor trains to handle the exponentially large representation of sentences construed by the tensor products of word embeddings. Here's how it works: sentences are broken down into a sequence of word embeddings, which are then distributed as inputs across the tensor train. This technique allows TTLM to compute probabilities of sentences efficiently without grappling with high-dimensional hardships directly.

Why should we care, though? The TTLM approach supposedly offers a more scalable architecture for encoding sentences than RNNs with lower complexity in handling high volumes of data. In particular, TTLM has showcased its prowess in outperforming basic RNN architectures in terms of perplexity metrics on standard benchmarks like WikiText-2 and PTB datasets.

Understanding TTLM Architecture

At its core, TTLM processes its input word embeddings through a sequence of operations (tensors), with each tensor connected by a common core tensor. This core tensor passes activation from one layer in the network to the next, a method that’s different yet somewhat reminiscent of traditional RNNs.

The paper introduces two noteworthy variants of TTLM:

  1. TTLM-Large: Here, we see a relatively larger model capable of capturing more complex patterns but at the risk of overfitting.
  2. TTLM-Tiny: A more compact version, potentially less powerful but also more robust to overfitting on smaller datasets.

These models reflect an important consideration in machine learning: trading off between model complexity and overfitting, especially in data-sensitive applications like LLMing.

Theoretical Insights and Practical Implications

Exploring the underlying dynamics of TTLM models, the researchers have found parallels with variants of RNNs, such as Second-order RNNs and Multiplicative Integration RNNs. This comparison not only places TTLM within the familiar territory of existing models but also provides insights into how alterations in tensorial architecture can lead to different learning behaviors and efficiency.

From a practical standpoint, the adaptability to different scales (from TTLM-Tiny to TTLM-Large) allows practitioners to tailor the model according to the computational resources and the specific demands of the task—a significant upside in deploying this model in real-world applications.

Looking Forward: The Future of Tensor Networks in AI

The promising results of TTLM on standardized datasets hint at a broader applicability of tensor networks in AI—extending beyond LLMs to potentially revolutionize how AI systems process large, complex datasets. However, it's not without challenges. The efficiency of tensor networks, particularly in training times and handling larger datasets, remains an area ripe for further exploration and optimization.

In conclusion, while tensor trains offer a novel and efficient method for LLMing, the road from research to real-world application involves significant experimentation and development. The dual variants of TTLM provide a foundation for further research, which could explore hybrid models or new tensor structures that could tackle the inherent trade-offs between model complexity and performance.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

HackerNews

  1. Language Modeling Using Tensor Trains (2 points, 0 comments)