Emergent Mind

Testing $C_k$-freeness in bounded-arboricity graphs

(2404.18126)
Published Apr 28, 2024 in cs.DS

Abstract

We study the problem of testing $Ck$-freeness ($k$-cycle-freeness) for fixed constant $k > 3$ in graphs with bounded arboricity (but unbounded degrees). In particular, we are interested in one-sided error algorithms, so that they must detect a copy of $Ck$ with high constant probability when the graph is $\epsilon$-far from $Ck$-free. We next state our results for constant arboricity and constant $\epsilon$ with a focus on the dependence on the number of graph vertices, $n$. The query complexity of all our algorithms grows polynomially with $1/\epsilon$. (1) As opposed to the case of $k=3$, where the complexity of testing $C3$-freeness grows with the arboricity of the graph but not with the size of the graph (Levi, ICALP 2021) this is no longer the case already for $k=4$. We show that $\Omega(n{1/4})$ queries are necessary for testing $C4$-freeness, and that $\widetilde{O}(n{1/4})$ are sufficient. The same bounds hold for $C5$. (2) For every fixed $k \geq 6$, any one-sided error algorithm for testing $Ck$-freeness must perform $\Omega(n{1/3})$ queries. (3) For $k=6$ we give a testing algorithm whose query complexity is $\widetilde{O}(n{1/2})$. (4) For any fixed $k$, the query complexity of testing $Ck$-freeness is upper bounded by ${O}(n{1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor})$. Our $\Omega(n{1/4})$ lower bound for testing $C_4$-freeness in constant arboricity graphs provides a negative answer to an open problem posed by (Goldreich, 2021).

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.