Testing $C_k$-freeness in bounded-arboricity graphs (2404.18126v1)
Abstract: We study the problem of testing $C_k$-freeness ($k$-cycle-freeness) for fixed constant $k > 3$ in graphs with bounded arboricity (but unbounded degrees). In particular, we are interested in one-sided error algorithms, so that they must detect a copy of $C_k$ with high constant probability when the graph is $\epsilon$-far from $C_k$-free. We next state our results for constant arboricity and constant $\epsilon$ with a focus on the dependence on the number of graph vertices, $n$. The query complexity of all our algorithms grows polynomially with $1/\epsilon$. (1) As opposed to the case of $k=3$, where the complexity of testing $C_3$-freeness grows with the arboricity of the graph but not with the size of the graph (Levi, ICALP 2021) this is no longer the case already for $k=4$. We show that $\Omega(n{1/4})$ queries are necessary for testing $C_4$-freeness, and that $\widetilde{O}(n{1/4})$ are sufficient. The same bounds hold for $C_5$. (2) For every fixed $k \geq 6$, any one-sided error algorithm for testing $C_k$-freeness must perform $\Omega(n{1/3})$ queries. (3) For $k=6$ we give a testing algorithm whose query complexity is $\widetilde{O}(n{1/2})$. (4) For any fixed $k$, the query complexity of testing $C_k$-freeness is upper bounded by ${O}(n{1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor})$. Our $\Omega(n{1/4})$ lower bound for testing $C_4$-freeness in constant arboricity graphs provides a negative answer to an open problem posed by (Goldreich, 2021).
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.