Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the structure of EFX orientations on graphs (2404.13527v2)

Published 21 Apr 2024 in cs.GT and math.CO

Abstract: Fair division is the problem of allocating a set of items among agents in a fair manner. One of the most sought-after fairness notions is envy-freeness (EF), requiring that no agent envies another's allocation. When items are indivisible, it ceases to exist, and envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) emerged as one of its strongest relaxations. The existence of EFX allocations is arguably the biggest open question within fair division. Recently, Christodoulou, Fiat, Koutsoupias, and Sgouritsa (EC 2023) showed that EFX allocations exist for the case of graphical valuations where an instance is represented by a graph: nodes are agents, edges are goods, and each agent values only her incident edges. On the other hand, they showed NP-hardness for checking the existence of EFX orientation where every edge is allocated to one of its incident vertices, and asked for a characterization of graphs that exhibit EFX orientation regardless of the assigned valuations. In this paper, we make significant progress toward answering their question. We introduce the notion of strongly EFX orientable graphs -- graphs that have EFX orientations regardless of how much agents value the edges. We show a surprising connection between this property and the chromatic number $\chi(G)$ of the graph $G$. In particular, we show that graphs with $\chi(G)\le 2$ are strongly EFX orientable, and those with $\chi(G)>3$ are not strongly EFX orientable. We provide examples of strongly EFX orientable and non-strongly EFX orientable graphs of $\chi(G)=3$ to prove tightness. Finally, we give a complete characterization of strong EFX orientability when restricted to binary valuations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. “EFX allocations: Simplifications and improvements” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07638, 2022
  2. “EFX: A Simpler Approach and an (Almost) Optimal Guarantee via Rainbow Cycle Number” In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’23 , London, United Kingdom,: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 61
  3. Georgios Amanatidis, Evangelos Markakis and Apostolos Ntokos “Multiple birds with one stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via envy cycle elimination” In Theor. Comput. Sci. 841, 2020, pp. 94–109
  4. “The Multi-Unit Assignment Problem: Theory and Evidence from Course Allocation at Harvard” In American Economic Review 102, 2010
  5. “Almost full EFX exists for four agents” In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 36.5, 2022, pp. 4826–4833
  6. Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy and Rohit Vaish “Finding Fair and Efficient Allocations” In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC), 2018, pp. 557–574
  7. Xiaolin Bu, Jiaxin Song and Ziqi Yu “EFX Allocations Exist for Binary Valuations” In Frontiers of Algorithmics - 17th International Joint Conference, IJTCS-FAW 2023 Macau, China, August 14-18, 2023, Proceedings 13933, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, 2023, pp. 252–262 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-39344-0“˙19
  8. Steven J. Brams and Alan D. Taylor “Fair division - from cake-cutting to dispute resolution” Cambridge University Press, 1996
  9. “The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare” In ACM Trans. Economics and Comput. 7.3, 2019, pp. 12:1–12:32
  10. Ioannis Caragiannis, Nick Gravin and Xin Huang “Envy-Freeness Up to Any Item with High Nash Welfare: The Virtue of Donating Items” In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2019, Phoenix, AZ, USA, June 24-28, 2019 ACM, 2019, pp. 527–545
  11. Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg and Kurt Mehlhorn “EFX Exists for Three Agents” In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’20 Virtual Event, Hungary: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 1–19
  12. “Maximin-aware allocations of indivisible goods” In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’19 Macao, China: AAAI Press, 2019, pp. 137–143
  13. “A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-Freeness” In SIAM J. Comput. 50.4, 2021, pp. 1336–1358
  14. “Improving EFX guarantees through rainbow cycle number” In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2021, pp. 310–311
  15. “Fair allocation in graphs” In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’23 , London, United Kingdom,: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 473–488
  16. R. Etkin, A. Parekh and D. Tse “Spectrum Sharing for Unlicensed Bands” In In Proceedings of the first IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005
  17. Michal Feldman, Simon Mauras and Tomasz Ponitka “On Optimal Tradeoffs between EFX and Nash Welfare”, 2023 arXiv:2302.09633 [cs.GT]
  18. “EFX Exists for Four Agents with Three Types of Valuations” In CoRR abs/2301.10632, 2023 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.10632
  19. Pranay Gorantla, Kunal Marwaha and Santhoshini Velusamy “Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible items” In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2023, Florence, Italy, January 22-25, 2023 SIAM, 2023, pp. 304–331 DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch13
  20. “On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods” In Proceedings 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-2004), New York, NY, USA, May 17-20, 2004 ACM, 2004, pp. 125–131 DOI: 10.1145/988772.988792
  21. Vasilis Livanos, Ruta Mehta and Aniket Murhekar “(Almost) Envy-Free, Proportional and Efficient Allocations of an Indivisible Mixed Manna” In 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2022, Auckland, New Zealand, May 9-13, 2022 International Foundation for Autonomous AgentsMultiagent Systems (IFAAMAS), 2022, pp. 1678–1680 DOI: 10.5555/3535850.3536074
  22. Ryoga Mahara “Extension of Additive Valuations to General Valuations on the Existence of EFX” In 29th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2021, September 6-8, 2021, Lisbon, Portugal (Virtual Conference) 204, LIPIcs Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021, pp. 66:1–66:15 DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2021.66
  23. Ryoga Mahara “Existence of EFX for two additive valuations” In Discret. Appl. Math. 340, 2023, pp. 115–122 DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2023.06.035
  24. “Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations” In SIAM J. Discret. Math. 34.2, 2020, pp. 1039–1068
  25. Ariel D. Procaccia “Technical Perspective: An Answer to Fair Division’s Most Enigmatic Question” In Commun. ACM 63.4 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 118
  26. John Winsor Pratt and Richard Jay Zeckhauser “The Fair and Efficient Division of the Winsor Family Silver” In Management Science 36.11, 1990, pp. 1293–1301
  27. Hugo Steinhaus “The Problem of Fair Division” In Econometrica 16.1, 1948, pp. 101–104
  28. Carsten Thomassen “Totally Odd -subdivisions in 4-chromatic Graphs” In Combinatorica 21.3, 2001, pp. 417–443
  29. T.W.M. Vossen “Fair allocation concepts in air traffic management”, 2002
  30. Wenan Zang “Proof of Toft’s Conjecture: Every Graph Containing No Fully Odd K4 is 3-Colorable” In Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 2.2, 1998, pp. 117–188

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com