Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 54 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 182 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 40 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Tinker or Transfer? A Tale of Two Techniques in Teaching Visualization (2404.10967v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: In education there exists a tension between two modes of learning: traditional lecture-based instruction and more tinkering-based creative learning. In this paper, we outline our efforts as two Ph.D. students (who are skilled in visualization but are not, importantly, professionally trained visualization experts) to implement creative learning activities in an information visualization course in our home department. We describe our motivation for doing so, and how what began out of necessity turned into an endeavor whose utility we strongly believe in. In implementing these activities, we received largely positive reviews from students, along with constructive feedback which helped us iteratively improve the activities. Finally, we also detail our future plans for turning this work into a formal design inquiry with students to build a new class centered entirely around creative learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. J. L. Austin and James O. Urmson. 2009. How to do things with words: the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (2. ed., [repr.] ed.). Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  2. Murat Aydoğdu and Uma Gupta. 2023. An Analysis of Data Visualization Course Syllabi. Business Education Innovation Journal 15, 1 (June 2023), 7–15.
  3. Challenges and Opportunities in Data Visualization Education: A Call to Action. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 30, 1 (2023), 649 – 660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378
  4. Social, behavioral, and economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science. Technical Report. National Science Foundation.
  5. S.K. Card and J. Mackinlay. 1997. The structure of the information visualization design space. In Proceedings of VIZ ’97: Visualization Conference, Information Visualization Symposium and Parallel Rendering Symposium. IEEE Comput. Soc, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 92–99,. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.1997.636792
  6. John K Gilbert. 2005. Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education. In Visualization in Science Education, John K. Gilbert (Ed.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
  7. Lynette M. Hudiburgh and Diana Garbinsky. 2020. Data Visualization: Bringing Data to Life in an Introductory Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education 28, 3 (Sept. 2020), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1796399
  8. The Significance of Practical Training in Linking Theoretical Studies with Practice. Higher Education 51, 3 (April 2006), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6391-8
  9. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. and Lawrence Tomei (Eds.). 2019. Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Modern Education Delivery:. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7365-4
  10. Jean Lave. 2009. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, GBR. OCLC: 958547773.
  11. Deborah Nolan and Jamis Perrett. 2016. Teaching and Learning Data Visualization: Ideas and Assignments. The American Statistician 70, 3 (July 2016), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2015.1123651
  12. Seymour Papert. 1982. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas (reprint ed.). Number 14 in Harvester studies in cognitive science. Harvester Press, Brighton.
  13. It Looks Like Fun, But Are They Learning? In Design, Make, Play. 49–70.
  14. Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits. Interactions 3, 5 (Sept. 1996), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/234757.234762
  15. Reflections and Considerations on Running Creative Visualization Learning Activities. In 2022 IEEE 4th Workshop on Visualization Guidelines in Research, Design, and Education (VisGuides). IEEE, Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/VisGuides57787.2022.00009
  16. William Sandoval. 2014. Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 1 (Jan. 2014), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
  17. Mary Eleanor Spear. 1969. Practical charting techniques. McGraw-Hill, New York. OCLC: 924909765.
  18. Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1990. Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16, 1 (Oct. 1990), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/494648
  19. Visualization in Science Education. Alberta Science Education Journal 41, 1 (2011), 22–30.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets