Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 147 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 398 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Accessibility in Information Retrieval (2404.08628v1)

Published 12 Apr 2024 in cs.IR and cs.DL

Abstract: This paper introduces the concept of accessibility from the field of transportation planning and adopts it within the context of Information Retrieval (IR). An analogy is drawn between the fields, which motivates the development of document accessibility measures for IR systems. Considering the accessibility of documents within a collection given an IR System provides a different perspective on the analysis and evaluation of such systems which could be used to inform the design, tuning and management of current and future IR systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. L. Azzopardi and V. Vinay. Document accessibility: Evaluating the access afforded to a document by the retrieval system. In Workshop on Novel Methodologies for Evaluation in Information Retrieval, pages 52–60, March 2008.
  2. L. Azzopardi and V. Vinay. Retrievability: an evaluation measure for higher order information access tasks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’08, page 561–570, 2008.
  3. The impact of caching on search engines. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGIR conference, pages 183–190, 2007.
  4. Chart of darkness: Mapping a large intranet. Technical report, CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, 2000.
  5. S. Buttcher and C. L. A. Clarke. A document-centric approach to static index pruning in text retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2006.
  6. W. S. Cooper. Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on weak ordering action of retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 19(1):30–41, 1968.
  7. Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 40(2):163–180, 2006.
  8. Improving deaf users’ accessibility in hypertext information retrieval: are graphical interfaces useful for them? Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(6):455–467(13), 2006.
  9. Access-ordered indexes. In Twenty-Seveth Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2004), pages 7–14, 2004.
  10. W. Hansen. How accessibility shape land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2):73–76, 1959.
  11. D. Hawking. Challenges in enterprise search. In ADC ’04: Proceedings of the 15th Australasian database conference, pages 15–24, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2004. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
  12. H. Neuburger. User benefit in the evaluation of transport and land use plans. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 5:52–75, 1971.
  13. Buying bestsellers online: A case study in search & searchability. In 7th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Sydney, Australia, 2002.
  14. C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, second edition edition, 1979.
  15. M. Wachs and T. G. Kumagai. Physiscal accessibility as a social indicator. Socioeconomic Planning Science, 7:327–456, 1973.
  16. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. Morgan Kaufmann Publishing, San Franciso, second edition edition, 1999.
Citations (42)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube