Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 91 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 55 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 194 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An explicit lower bound for large gaps between some consecutive primes (2404.06951v4)

Published 10 Apr 2024 in math.NT

Abstract: Let $p_{n}$ denote the $n$th prime and for any fixed positive integer $k$ and $X\geq 2$, put [ G_{k}(X):=\max {p _{n+k}\leq X} \min { p{n+1}-p_{n}, \ldots , p_{n+k}-p_{n+k-1} }. ] Ford, Maynard and Tao proved that there exists an effective absolute constant $c_{LG}>0$ such that [ G_{k}(X)\geq \frac{c_{LG}}{k{2}}\frac{\log X \log \log X \log \log \log \log X}{\log \log \log X} ] holds for any sufficiently large $X$. The main purpose of this paper is to determine the constant $c_{LG}$ above. We see that $c_{LG}$ is determined by several factors related to analytic number theory, for example, the ratio of integrals of functions in the multidimensional sieve of Maynard, the distribution of primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli, and the coefficient of upper bound sieve of Selberg. We prove that the above inequality is valid at least for $c_{LG}\approx 2.0\times 10{-17}$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: