Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An explicit lower bound for large gaps between some consecutive primes (2404.06951v4)

Published 10 Apr 2024 in math.NT

Abstract: Let $p_{n}$ denote the $n$th prime and for any fixed positive integer $k$ and $X\geq 2$, put [ G_{k}(X):=\max {p _{n+k}\leq X} \min { p{n+1}-p_{n}, \ldots , p_{n+k}-p_{n+k-1} }. ] Ford, Maynard and Tao proved that there exists an effective absolute constant $c_{LG}>0$ such that [ G_{k}(X)\geq \frac{c_{LG}}{k{2}}\frac{\log X \log \log X \log \log \log \log X}{\log \log \log X} ] holds for any sufficiently large $X$. The main purpose of this paper is to determine the constant $c_{LG}$ above. We see that $c_{LG}$ is determined by several factors related to analytic number theory, for example, the ratio of integrals of functions in the multidimensional sieve of Maynard, the distribution of primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli, and the coefficient of upper bound sieve of Selberg. We prove that the above inequality is valid at least for $c_{LG}\approx 2.0\times 10{-17}$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com