Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

DRIVE: Dual Gradient-Based Rapid Iterative Pruning (2404.03687v1)

Published 1 Apr 2024 in cs.LG and cs.CV

Abstract: Modern deep neural networks (DNNs) consist of millions of parameters, necessitating high-performance computing during training and inference. Pruning is one solution that significantly reduces the space and time complexities of DNNs. Traditional pruning methods that are applied post-training focus on streamlining inference, but there are recent efforts to leverage sparsity early on by pruning before training. Pruning methods, such as iterative magnitude-based pruning (IMP) achieve up to a 90% parameter reduction while retaining accuracy comparable to the original model. However, this leads to impractical runtime as it relies on multiple train-prune-reset cycles to identify and eliminate redundant parameters. In contrast, training agnostic early pruning methods, such as SNIP and SynFlow offer fast pruning but fall short of the accuracy achieved by IMP at high sparsities. To bridge this gap, we present Dual Gradient-Based Rapid Iterative Pruning (DRIVE), which leverages dense training for initial epochs to counteract the randomness inherent at the initialization. Subsequently, it employs a unique dual gradient-based metric for parameter ranking. It has been experimentally demonstrated for VGG and ResNet architectures on CIFAR-10/100 and Tiny ImageNet, and ResNet on ImageNet that DRIVE consistently has superior performance over other training-agnostic early pruning methods in accuracy. Notably, DRIVE is 43$\times$ to 869$\times$ faster than IMP for pruning.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com