Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Improved Total Domination and Total Roman Domination in Unit Disk Graphs (2404.03511v1)

Published 4 Apr 2024 in cs.CG and math.CO

Abstract: Let $G=(V, E)$ be a simple undirected graph with no isolated vertex. A set $D_t\subseteq V$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if $(i)$ $D_t$ is a dominating set, and $(ii)$ the set $D_t$ induces a subgraph with no isolated vertex. The total dominating set of minimum cardinality is called the minimum total dominating set, and the size of the minimum total dominating set is called the total domination number ($\gamma_t(G)$). Given a graph $G$, the total dominating set (TDS) problem is to find a total dominating set of minimum cardinality. A Roman dominating function (RDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f:V\rightarrow {0,1,2}$ such that each vertex $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V$ with $f(u)=2$. A RDF $f$ of a graph $G$ is said to be a total Roman dominating function (TRDF) if the induced subgraph of $V_1\cup V_2$ does not contain any isolated vertex, where $V_i={u\in V|f(u)=i}$. Given a graph $G$, the total Roman dominating set (TRDS) problem is to minimize the weight, $W(f)=\sum_{u\in V} f(u)$, called the total Roman domination number ($\gamma_{tR}(G)$). In this paper, we are the first to show that the TRDS problem is NP-complete in unit disk graphs (UDGs). Furthermore, we propose a $7.17\operatorname{-}$ factor approximation algorithm for the TDS problem and a $6.03\operatorname{-}$ factor approximation algorithm for the TRDS problem in geometric unit disk graphs. The running time for both algorithms is notably bounded by $O(n\log{k})$, where $n$ represents the number of vertices in the given UDG and $k$ represents the size of the independent set in (i.e., $D$ and $V_2$ in TDS and TRDS problems, respectively) the given UDG.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Total roman domination in graphs. Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, 10(2):501–517, 2016.
  2. Total roman domination number of trees. Australasian. J. Combinatorics, 69(2):271–285, 2017.
  3. D. Amos and E. DeLaVina. On total domination in graphs. Senior Project, University of Houston Downtown, 2012.
  4. Unit disk graphs. Discrete mathematics, 86(1-3):165–177, 1990.
  5. Total domination in graphs. Networks, 10(3):211–219, 1980.
  6. Roman domination in graphs. Discrete mathematics, 278(1-3):11–22, 2004.
  7. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press, 2022.
  8. Efficient sub-5 approximations for minimum dominating sets in unit disk graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 540:70–81, 2014.
  9. Semitotal domination in graphs. Utilitas Mathematica, 94, 2014.
  10. Total double roman domination in graphs. Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization, 5(1):27–39, 2020.
  11. J. Hartmanis. Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of np-completeness (michael r. garey and david s. johnson). Siam Review, 24(1):90, 1982.
  12. Fundamentals of domination in graphs. CRC press, 1998.
  13. Topics in Domination in Graphs. Springer, 2020.
  14. Bibliography on domination in graphs and some basic definitions of domination parameters. In Annals of Discrete Mathematics, volume 48, pages 257–277. Elsevier, 1991.
  15. M. A. Henning. A survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 309(1):32–63, 2009.
  16. M. A. Henning and A. Yeo. Total domination in graphs. Springer, 2013.
  17. Total domination in geometric unit disk graphs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, 2021, August 10-12, 2021, pages 219–227, 2021.
  18. On the algorithmic complexity of total domination. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 5(3):420–425, 1984.
  19. Roman domination on strongly chordal graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 26(3):608–619, 2013.
  20. Simple heuristics for unit disk graphs. Networks, 25(2):59–68, 1995.
  21. Further results on the total roman domination in graphs. Distances and Domination in Graphs, page 55, 2020.
  22. Np-completeness of total and connected domination and irredundance for bipartite graphs. In Tech. Rept. 428. Clemson University Clemson, SC, 1983.
  23. A. Poureidi. Total roman domination for proper interval graphs. Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applications (EJGTA), 8(2):401–413, 2020.
  24. S. Rout and G. K. Das. Semi-total domination in unit disk graphs. In Conference on Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics, pages 117–129. Springer, 2024.
  25. Total roman domination and total domination in unit disk graphs. Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization, 2024.
  26. Roman domination and its variants in unit disk graphs. Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 2(01):99–105, 2010.
  27. On the total double roman domination. IEEE Access, 7:52035–52041, 2019.
  28. L. Sun. An upper bound for the total domination number. J. Beijing Inst. Tech, 4(2):111–114, 1995.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Sasmita Rout (2 papers)
  2. Gautam Kumar Das (1 paper)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.