Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Spin-NeuroMem: A Low-Power Neuromorphic Associative Memory Design Based on Spintronic Devices (2404.02463v1)

Published 3 Apr 2024 in cs.AR, cs.ET, and physics.app-ph

Abstract: Biologically-inspired computing models have made significant progress in recent years, but the conventional von Neumann architecture is inefficient for the large-scale matrix operations and massive parallelism required by these models. This paper presents Spin-NeuroMem, a low-power circuit design of Hopfield network for the function of associative memory. Spin-NeuroMem is equipped with energy-efficient spintronic synapses which utilize magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) to store weight matrices of multiple associative memories. The proposed synapse design achieves as low as 17.4% power consumption compared to the state-of-the-art synapse designs. Spin-NeuroMem also encompasses a novel voltage converter with 60% less transistor usage for effective Hopfield network computation. In addition, we propose an associative memory simulator for the first time, which achieves a 5.05Mx speedup with a comparable associative memory effect. By harnessing the potential of spintronic devices, this work sheds light on the development of energy-efficient and scalable neuromorphic computing systems. The source code will be publicly available after the manuscript is reviewed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. Hopfield J J and Tank D W 1986 Science 233 625–633 doi: 10.1126/science.3755256
  2. Telminov O and Gornev E 2022 Possibilities and Limitations of Memristor Crossbars for Neuromorphic Computing 2022 6th Scientific School Dyn. Complex Networks and their Appl. (DCNA) pp 278–281 doi: 10.1109/DCNA56428.2022.9923302
  3. Jang J, Lee S and Park W 2023 IEEE Trans. Magn. 59 1–5 doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2023.3288546
  4. Fukami S and Ohno H 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 151904 doi: 10.1063/1.5042317
  5. Amirany A, Moaiyeri M H and Jafari K 2020 IEEE TETC 10 428–437 doi: 10.1109/TETC.2020.3026179
  6. Gallagher W J and Parkin S S P 2006 IBM J. Res. Dev. 50 5–23 doi: 10.1147/rd.501.0005
  7. Chen J Y, Feng J F and Coey J M D 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 142407 doi: 10.1063/1.3701277
  8. Mathon J and Umerski A 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 220403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.220403
  9. Ebong I E and Mazumder P 2011 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 10 1454–1463 doi: 10.1109/TNANO.2011.2166805
  10. LeCun 1998 http://yann. lecun. com/exdb/mnist/
  11. MacFarland T W and Yates J M 2016 Mann–Whitney U Test (Cham: Springer) pp 103–132 ISBN 978-3-319-30634-6 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30634-6_4

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.