Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Combining Safe Intervals and RRT* for Efficient Multi-Robot Path Planning in Complex Environments (2404.01752v2)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.MA

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of Multi-Robot Path Planning (MRPP) in continuous space to find conflict-free paths. The difficulty of the problem arises from two primary factors. First, the involvement of multiple robots leads to combinatorial decision-making, which escalates the search space exponentially. Second, the continuous space presents potentially infinite states and actions. For this problem, we propose a two-level approach where the low level is a sampling-based planner Safe Interval RRT* (SI-RRT*) that finds a collision-free trajectory for individual robots. The high level can use any method that can resolve inter-robot conflicts where we employ two representative methods that are Prioritized Planning (SI-CPP) and Conflict Based Search (SI-CCBS). Experimental results show that SI-RRT* can find a high-quality solution quickly with a small number of samples. SI-CPP exhibits improved scalability while SI-CCBS produces higher-quality solutions compared to the state-of-the-art planners for continuous space. Compared to the most scalable existing algorithm, SI-CPP achieves a success rate that is up to 94% higher with 100 robots while maintaining solution quality (i.e., flowtime, the sum of travel times of all robots) without significant compromise. SI-CPP also decreases the makespan up to 45%. SI-CCBS decreases the flowtime by 9% compared to the competitor, albeit exhibiting a 14% lower success rate.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. R. Stern, N. Sturtevant, A. Felner, S. Koenig, H. Ma, T. Walker, J. Li, D. Atzmon, L. Cohen, T. Kumar et al., “Multi-agent pathfinding: Definitions, variants, and benchmarks,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, pp. 151–158.
  2. J. Yu and S. LaValle, “Structure and intractability of optimal multi-robot path planning on graphs,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1443–1449.
  3. G. Wagner and H. Choset, “Subdimensional expansion for multirobot path planning,” Artificial intelligence, vol. 219, pp. 1–24, 2015.
  4. T. Standley, “Finding optimal solutions to cooperative pathfinding problems,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1, 2010, pp. 173–178.
  5. M. Goldenberg, A. Felner, R. Stern, G. Sharon, N. Sturtevant, R. C. Holte, and J. Schaeffer, “Enhanced partial expansion a,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 50, pp. 141–187, 2014.
  6. P. Velagapudi, K. Sycara, and P. Scerri, “Decentralized prioritized planning in large multirobot teams,” in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.   IEEE, 2010, pp. 4603–4609.
  7. D. Silver, “Cooperative pathfinding,” in Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 117–122.
  8. G. Sharon, R. Stern, A. Felner, and N. R. Sturtevant, “Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 219, pp. 40–66, 2015.
  9. M. Barer, G. Sharon, R. Stern, and A. Felner, “Suboptimal variants of the conflict-based search algorithm for the multi-agent pathfinding problem,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, pp. 19–27.
  10. J. Li, W. Ruml, and S. Koenig, “EECBS: A bounded-suboptimal search for multi-agent path finding,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 14, 2021, pp. 12 353–12 362.
  11. M. Phillips and M. Likhachev, “Sipp: Safe interval path planning for dynamic environments,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011, pp. 5628–5635.
  12. K. Okumura and X. Défago, “Quick multi-robot motion planning by combining sampling and search,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 2023.
  13. F. Grothe, V. N. Hartmann, A. Orthey, and M. Toussaint, “ST-RRT*{}^{*}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT * end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT: Asymptotically-optimal bidirectional motion planning through space-time,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.   IEEE, 2022, pp. 3314–3320.
  14. C. Yu, Q. Li, S. Gao, and A. Prorok, “Accelerating multi-agent planning using graph transformers with bounded suboptimality,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2023.
  15. A. Andreychuk, K. Yakovlev, D. Atzmon, and R. Sternr, “Multi-agent pathfinding with continuous time,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, pp. 39–45.
  16. A. Orthey, S. Akbar, and M. Toussaint, “Multilevel motion planning: A fiber bundle formulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09435, 2020.
  17. J. Li, Z. Chen, D. Harabor, P. J. Stuckey, and S. Koenig, “MAPF-LNS2: Fast repairing for multi-agent path finding via large neighborhood search,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 9, 2022, pp. 10 256–10 265.
  18. I. Solis, J. Motes, R. Sandström, and N. M. Amato, “Representation-optimal multi-robot motion planning using conflict-based search,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4608–4615, 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com