Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 64 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

How COVID-19 has Impacted the Anti-Vaccine Discourse: A Large-Scale Twitter Study Spanning Pre-COVID and Post-COVID Era (2404.01669v1)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.SI, cs.CY, and physics.soc-ph

Abstract: The debate around vaccines has been going on for decades, but the COVID-19 pandemic showed how crucial it is to understand and mitigate anti-vaccine sentiments. While the pandemic may be over, it is still important to understand how the pandemic affected the anti-vaccine discourse, and whether the arguments against non-COVID vaccines (e.g., Flu, MMR, IPV, HPV vaccines) have also changed due to the pandemic. This study attempts to answer these questions through a large-scale study of anti-vaccine posts on Twitter. Almost all prior works that utilized social media to understand anti-vaccine opinions considered only the three broad stances of Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax, and Neutral. There has not been any effort to identify the specific reasons/concerns behind the anti-vax sentiments (e.g., side-effects, conspiracy theories, political reasons) on social media at scale. In this work, we propose two novel methods for classifying tweets into 11 different anti-vax concerns -- a discriminative approach (entailment-based) and a generative approach (based on instruction tuning of LLMs) -- which outperform several strong baselines. We then apply this classifier on anti-vaccine tweets posted over a 5-year period (Jan 2018 - Jan 2023) to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the anti-vaccine concerns among the masses. We find that the pandemic has made the anti-vaccine discourse far more complex than in the pre-COVID times, and increased the variety of concerns being voiced. Alarmingly, we find that concerns about COVID vaccines are now being projected onto the non-COVID vaccines, thus making more people hesitant in taking vaccines in the post-COVID era.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Altman, J. D.; et al. 2023. Factors affecting vaccine attitudes influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines.
  2. Ameer, I.; et al. 2023. Multi-label emotion classification in texts using transfer learning. Expert Systems with Applications.
  3. Bonnevie, E.; et al. 2020. Quantifying the rise of vaccine opposition on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication in Healthcare.
  4. Burki, T. 2020. The online anti-vaccine movement in the age of COVID-19. The Lancet Digital Health.
  5. Chowdhury, J. R.; et al. 2020. Cross-lingual disaster-related multi-label tweet classification with manifold mixup. In Proc. ACL: Student Research Workshop.
  6. Chung, H. W.; et al. 2022. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416.
  7. Cotfas, L.-A.; et al. 2021. The Longest Month: Analyzing COVID-19 Vaccination Opinions Dynamics From Tweets in the Month Following the First Vaccine Announcement. IEEE Access.
  8. Durmaz, N.; et al. 2022. The dramatic increase in anti-vaccine discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social network analysis of Twitter. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.
  9. Fasce, A.; et al. 2023. A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling. Nature Human Behaviour.
  10. Gunaratne, K.; et al. 2019. Temporal trends in anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter. Vaccine.
  11. Hu, E. J.; et al. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685.
  12. Hwang, J.; et al. 2022. Vaccine discourse during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: Topical structure and source patterns informing efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy. Plos one.
  13. Jarynowski, A.; et al. 2021. Mild adverse events of Sputnik V vaccine in Russia: social media content analysis of telegram via deep learning. Journal of Medical Internet Research.
  14. Kata, A. 2012. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm–An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine.
  15. Knijff, M.; et al. 2023. Parental intention, attitudes, beliefs, trust and deliberation towards childhood vaccination in the Netherlands in 2022: Indications of change compared to 2013. medRxiv.
  16. Liu, Y.; et al. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692.
  17. Longpre, S.; et al. 2023. The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2301.13688.
  18. Mathew, B.; et al. 2021. Hatexplain: A benchmark dataset for explainable hate speech detection. In Proc. AAAI.
  19. Mu, Y.; et al. 2023. VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy Towards COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter. In Proc. ICWSM.
  20. Mukherjee, R.; et al. 2021. Understanding the role of affect dimensions in detecting emotions from tweets: A multi-task approach. In Proc. SIGIR.
  21. Müller, M.; et al. 2020. Covid-twitter-bert: A natural language processing model to analyse covid-19 content on twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07503.
  22. Müller, M. M.; et al. 2019. Crowdbreaks: tracking health trends using public social media data and crowdsourcing. Frontiers in public health.
  23. Pedregosa, F.; et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
  24. Poddar, S.; et al. 2022a. CAVES: A dataset to facilitate Explainable Classification and Summarization of Concerns towards COVID Vaccines. In Proc. SIGIR.
  25. Poddar, S.; et al. 2022b. Winds of Change: Impact of COVID-19 on Vaccine-related Opinions of Twitter users. In Proc. ICWSM.
  26. Praveen, S.; et al. 2021. Analyzing the attitude of Indian citizens towards COVID-19 vaccine-A text analytics study. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.
  27. Raffel, C.; et al. 2020. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. JMLR.
  28. Reimers, N.; et al. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
  29. Rivera-Rivera, J. N.; et al. 2023. Attitudes towards HPV and COVID school-entry policies among adults living in Puerto Rico. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.
  30. Simig, D.; et al. 2022. Open vocabulary extreme classification using generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05812.
  31. Entailment as few-shot learner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.14690.
  32. Wolf, T.; et al. 2020. Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing. In Proc. EMNLP: System Demos.
  33. Zhang, Z.; et al. 2021. Explain and predict, and then predict again. In Proc. WSDM.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now