Two-Stage Nuisance Function Estimation for Causal Mediation Analysis (2404.00735v2)
Abstract: Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2012) introduced an efficient, debiased, and robust influence function-based estimator for the mediation functional, which is the key component in mediation analysis. This estimator relies on the treatment, mediator, and outcome mean mechanisms. However, treating these three mechanisms as nuisance functions and fitting them as accurately as possible may not be the most effective approach. Instead, it is essential to identify the specific functionals and aspects of these mechanisms that impact the estimation of the mediation functional. In this work, we propose a two-stage estimation strategy for certain nuisance functions in the influence function of the mediation functional that are based on these three mechanisms. This strategy is guided by the role those nuisance functions play in the bias structure of the influence function-based estimator for the mediation functional. In the first stage, we estimate two primary nuisance functions, namely the inverse treatment mechanism and the outcome mean mechanism. In the second stage, we leverage these primary functions to estimate two additional nuisance functions that encapsulate the needed information about the mediator mechanism. We propose a nonparametric weighted balancing estimation approach to design the estimator for one of the nuisance functions in Stage 1 and one of in Stage 2, where the weights are designed directly based on the bias of the final estimator for the mediation functional. The remaining two nuisance functions are estimated using standard parametric or nonparametric regression methods. Once all four nuisance functions are obtained, they are incorporated into the influence function-based estimator. We provide a robustness analysis of the proposed method and establish sufficient conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimator for the mediation functional.
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
- A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological methods, 15(4):309.
- Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 76(1):243–263.
- MacKinnon, D. (2012). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
- Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 411– 420).
- Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias. International journal of epidemiology, 42(5):1511–1519.
- Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology, 3(2):143–155.
- Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of educational Psychology, 66(5):688.
- Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. Annals of statistics, 40(3):1816.
- A review of causal estimation of effects in mediation analyses. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21(1):77–107.
- VanderWeele, T. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press.