Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Give Text A Chance: Advocating for Equal Consideration for Language and Visualization (2404.00131v1)

Published 29 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Visualization research tends to de-emphasize consideration of the textual context in which its images are placed. We argue that visualization research should consider textual representations as a primary alternative to visual options when assessing designs, and when assessing designs, equal attention should be given to the construction of the language as to the visualizations. We also call for a consideration of readability when integrating visualizations with written text. In highlighting these points, visualization research would be elevated in efficacy and demonstrate thorough accounting for viewers' needs and responses.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, pages 1–14, 2021.
  2. N. S. Baron. Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2):15–20, 2017.
  3. Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(1):519–528, 2015.
  4. P. Carpenter and P. Shah. A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4:75–100, 1998.
  5. R. Fischer-Baum and C. Estebann. Working in a graphics visual storytelling team. In Information+ Conference. 2018. https://vimeo.com/301938339.
  6. The impact of skim reading and navigation when reading hyperlinks on the web. PloS one, 15(9):e0239134, 2020.
  7. M. Hearst and M. Tory. Would you like a chart with that? incorporating visualizations into conversational interfaces. In 2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2019.
  8. Tracing integration of text and pictures in newspaper reading. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 125:1–19, 2005.
  9. Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 23(9):1215–1226, 2009.
  10. Frames and slants in titles of visualizations on controversial topics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2018.
  11. Skim-reading strategies in sighted and visually-impaired individuals: a comparative study. In Proceedings of the 11th Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference, pages 170–177, 2018.
  12. R. E. Mayer. Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation, volume 41, pages 85–139. Elsevier, 2002.
  13. The role of titles in enhancing data visualization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 84:101896, 2021.
  14. M. Wolf. Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. Harper Perennial New York, 2007.
  15. Eye tracking indicators of reading approaches in text-picture comprehension. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5):46–66, 2014.
Citations (10)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets