Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 170 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 60 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

LLMSense: Harnessing LLMs for High-level Reasoning Over Spatiotemporal Sensor Traces (2403.19857v1)

Published 28 Mar 2024 in cs.AI

Abstract: Most studies on machine learning in sensing systems focus on low-level perception tasks that process raw sensory data within a short time window. However, many practical applications, such as human routine modeling and occupancy tracking, require high-level reasoning abilities to comprehend concepts and make inferences based on long-term sensor traces. Existing machine learning-based approaches for handling such complex tasks struggle to generalize due to the limited training samples and the high dimensionality of sensor traces, necessitating the integration of human knowledge for designing first-principle models or logic reasoning methods. We pose a fundamental question: Can we harness the reasoning capabilities and world knowledge of LLMs to recognize complex events from long-term spatiotemporal sensor traces? To answer this question, we design an effective prompting framework for LLMs on high-level reasoning tasks, which can handle traces from the raw sensor data as well as the low-level perception results. We also design two strategies to enhance performance with long sensor traces, including summarization before reasoning and selective inclusion of historical traces. Our framework can be implemented in an edge-cloud setup, running small LLMs on the edge for data summarization and performing high-level reasoning on the cloud for privacy preservation. The results show that LLMSense can achieve over 80\% accuracy on two high-level reasoning tasks such as dementia diagnosis with behavior traces and occupancy tracking with environmental sensor traces. This paper provides a few insights and guidelines for leveraging LLM for high-level reasoning on sensor traces and highlights several directions for future work.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. M. Weber, F. Banihashemi, P. Mandl, H.-A. Jacobsen, and R. Mayer, “Overcoming data scarcity through transfer learning in co2-based building occupancy detection,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, 2023, pp. 1–10.
  2. N. Banovic, T. Buzali, F. Chevalier, J. Mankoff, and A. K. Dey, “Modeling and understanding human routine behavior,” in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016, pp. 248–260.
  3. F.-T. Sun, Y.-T. Yeh, H.-T. Cheng, C. Kuo, and M. Griss, “Nonparametric discovery of human routines from sensor data,” in 2014 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom).   IEEE, 2014, pp. 11–19.
  4. F. Ingelrest, G. Barrenetxea, G. Schaefer, M. Vetterli, O. Couach, and M. Parlange, “Sensorscope: Application-specific sensor network for environmental monitoring,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2010.
  5. T. Han, K. Muhammad, T. Hussain, J. Lloret, and S. W. Baik, “An efficient deep learning framework for intelligent energy management in iot networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3170–3179, 2020.
  6. X. Xu, X. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Nepal, Y. Sefidgar, W. Seo, K. S. Kuehn, J. F. Huckins, M. E. Morris et al., “Globem: Cross-dataset generalization of longitudinal human behavior modeling,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–34, 2023.
  7. C. Chang, W.-C. Peng, and T.-F. Chen, “Llm4ts: Two-stage fine-tuning for time-series forecasting with pre-trained llms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08469, 2023.
  8. S. Mirchandani, F. Xia, P. Florence, D. Driess, M. G. Arenas, K. Rao, D. Sadigh, A. Zeng et al., “Large language models as general pattern machines,” in 7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2023.
  9. X. Liu, D. McDuff, G. Kovacs, I. Galatzer-Levy, J. Sunshine, J. Zhan, M.-Z. Poh, S. Liao, P. Di Achille, and S. Patel, “Large language models are few-shot health learners,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15525, 2023.
  10. H. Xu, L. Han, M. Li, and M. Srivastava, “Penetrative ai: Making llms comprehend the physical world,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09605, 2023.
  11. Y. Chen, H. Xie, M. Ma, Y. Kang, X. Gao, L. Shi, Y. Cao, X. Gao, H. Fan, M. Wen et al., “Automatic root cause analysis via large language models for cloud incidents,” 2024.
  12. Z. Yan, K. Zhang, R. Zhou, L. He, X. Li, and L. Sun, “Multimodal chatgpt for medical applications: an experimental study of gpt-4v,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19061, 2023.
  13. J. V. Jeyakumar, A. Sarker, L. A. Garcia, and M. Srivastava, “X-char: A concept-based explainable complex human activity recognition model,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2023.
  14. M. Jin, S. Wang, L. Ma, Z. Chu, J. Y. Zhang, X. Shi, P.-Y. Chen, Y. Liang, Y.-F. Li, S. Pan et al., “Time-llm: Time series forecasting by reprogramming large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01728, 2023.
  15. H. Xue and F. D. Salim, “Utilizing language models for energy load forecasting,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, 2023, pp. 224–227.
  16. X. Xu, B. Yao, Y. Dong, H. Yu, J. Hendler, A. K. Dey, and D. Wang, “Leveraging large language models for mental health prediction via online text data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14385, 2023.
  17. X. Ouyang, Z. Xie, H. Fu, S. Cheng, L. Pan, N. Ling, G. Xing, J. Zhou, and J. Huang, “Harmony: Heterogeneous multi-modal federated learning through disentangled model training,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, 2023, pp. 530–543.
  18. “ollama,” https://github.com/ollama/ollama, 2024.
  19. A. Gu, K. Goel, and C. Ré, “Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00396, 2021.
  20. A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752, 2023.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper introduces LLMSense, a framework that utilizes LLM reasoning and domain knowledge for analyzing long-term sensor data.
  • It employs effective prompting and two key strategies—summarization and selective inclusion—to manage extensive sensor traces.
  • Evaluations demonstrate accuracy above 80% in tasks such as dementia diagnosis and occupancy tracking, proving real-world applicability.

Summary of "LLMSense: Harnessing LLMs for High-level Reasoning Over Spatiotemporal Sensor Traces"

This essay provides a detailed examination of the paper "LLMSense: Harnessing LLMs for High-level Reasoning Over Spatiotemporal Sensor Traces," which addresses the challenge of applying LLMs for high-level reasoning tasks involving long-term sensor data. The paper presents LLMSense, a framework designed to leverage LLMs' reasoning capabilities and extensive world knowledge to interpret and generate predictions from sensor traces. Two distinct strategies for managing extensive trace data—summarization and selective inclusion of historical traces—are pivotal to the framework's functionality in real-world scenarios, such as dementia diagnosis and occupancy tracking.

Motivation and Background

The paper highlights the limitations of traditional machine learning approaches in handling long-term sensor data for high-level reasoning tasks, such as human routine modeling and environmental monitoring. Existing techniques often struggle with generalization due to the high dimensionality of data and limited training samples. By contrast, LLMs, with their ability to understand complex patterns and draw from vast domain-specific knowledge bases, offer a promising alternative for high-level reasoning over sensor traces. Figure 1

Figure 1: Comparison between low-level perception tasks (e.g., activity recognition) and high-level reasoning tasks (cognitive impairment detection).

LLMSense Framework Design

The LLMSense framework is structured around an effective prompting strategy designed to enhance high-level reasoning over sensor traces while maintaining data privacy. The framework encompasses the following key components:

  • Prompt Design: Introduces a comprehensive zero-shot prompting template for each task, encapsulating objectives, context, data, and output format constraints. This tailored approach ensures the seamless integration of domain knowledge to facilitate high-level reasoning tasks. Figure 2

    Figure 2: Overview of LLMSense. Effective prompting for high-level reasoning over sensor traces.

  • Handling Long Sensor Traces: Two methods—summarizing sensor trace patterns before reasoning and selectively including relevant historical data—counteract the challenges posed by lengthy data streams. These methods optimize the cognitive processes of LLMs, allowing them to handle long-term data efficiently. Figure 3

    Figure 3: Different sources of spatial-temporal traces. (a) Traces from raw sensor data. (b) Traces from low-level perception results.

Implementation and Evaluation

The LLMSense framework was implemented using established LLM architectures, including LLama2-13B, LLama2-70B, and GPT3.5, evaluated in edge-cloud configurations to balance computational efficiency and data privacy. The framework demonstrated its efficacy across datasets and tasks involving dementia diagnosis with behavior traces and occupancy tracking using environmental sensor data.

Results

  • Performance: LLMSense achieved competitive accuracy rates of over 80% for complex high-level reasoning tasks, validating its use of domain knowledge and LLM reasoning capabilities. The results underscore LLMSense's consistency across different models and configurations. Figure 4

    Figure 4: Overall performance of two high-level reasoning tasks with different LLMs.

  • Latency: With privacy concerns limiting the transmission of raw data, the framework's edge-cloud implementation proved instrumental in optimizing the trade-off between accuracy, latency, and data privacy. Figure 5

    Figure 5: Performance with different lengths of historical traces.

Future Directions

The paper identifies several areas for further research, such as enhancing the ability to process infinite traces, improving model performance through iterative verifications, and integrating low-level perception with high-level reasoning tasks. These explorations aim to refine LLM application in high-level reasoning over sensor data.

Conclusion

"LLMSense" effectively demonstrates the potential of integrating LLMs with sensor data analytics to facilitate sophisticated high-level reasoning tasks. By capitalizing on LLMs' strengths in pattern recognition and domain knowledge utilization, LLMSense presents an adaptable framework capable of advancing intelligent sensor environments. The paper provides a foundational basis for further exploration into refining LLM applications in real-world settings where sensor data offers critical insights across various domains.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.