Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ensuring Safe Autonomy: Navigating the Future of Autonomous Vehicles (2403.19006v1)

Published 27 Mar 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Autonomous driving vehicles provide a vast potential for realizing use cases in the on-road and off-road domains. Consequently, remarkable solutions exist to autonomous systems' environmental perception and control. Nevertheless, proof of safety remains an open challenge preventing such machinery from being introduced to markets and deployed in real world. Traditional approaches for safety assurance of autonomously driving vehicles often lead to underperformance due to conservative safety assumptions that cannot handle the overall complexity. Besides, the more sophisticated safety systems rely on the vehicle's perception systems. However, perception is often unreliable due to uncertainties resulting from disturbances or the lack of context incorporation for data interpretation. Accordingly, this paper illustrates the potential of a modular, self-adaptive autonomy framework with integrated dynamic risk management to overcome the abovementioned drawbacks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. R. Okuda, Y. Kajiwara, and K. Terashima, “A survey of technical trend of ADAS and autonomous driving,” in Proceedings of Technical Program - 2014 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSI-TSA), 2014, pp. 1–4.
  2. E. Yurtsever, J. Lambert, A. Carballo, and K. Takeda, “A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 58 443–58 469, 2020.
  3. R. Mariani, “An overview of autonomous vehicles safety,” in 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2018, pp. 6A.1–1–6A.1–6.
  4. J. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Huang, J. Zhao, and F. Bella, “Safety of autonomous vehicles,” Journal of advanced transportation, vol. 2020, pp. 1–13, 2020.
  5. D. Schneider, J. Reich, R. Adler, and P. Liggesmeyer, “Dynamic risk management in cyber physical systems,” 2024.
  6. M. Naumann, F. Wirth, F. Oboril, K. Scholl, M. S. Elli, I. Alvarez, J. Weast, and C. Stiller, “On responsibility sensitive safety in car-following situations - a parameter analysis on german highways,” in 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2021, pp. 83–90.
  7. R. Tiusanen, T. Malm, and A. Ronkainen, “An overview of current safety requirements for autonomous machines – review of standards,” Open Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 665–673, 2020.
  8. S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Shammah, and A. Shashua, “On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars,” 2018.
  9. “IEEE standard for assumptions in safety-related models for automated driving systems,” IEEE Std 2846-2022, pp. 1–59, 2022.
  10. T. Ropertz, P. Wolf, and K. Berns, “Behavior-based low-level control for (semi-) autonomous vehicles in rough terrain,” in Proceedings of ISR 2018: 50th International Symposium on Robotics, Munich, Germany, June 20–21 2018, pp. 386–393.
  11. J. Reich and M. Trapp, “SINADRA: Towards a framework for assurable situation-aware dynamic risk assessment of autonomous vehicles,” in 2020 16th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), 2020, pp. 47–50.
  12. Q. H. Jan, P. Wolf, K. Berns, J. Reich, and M. Wellstein, “Integration of human skeleton posture models into REACTiON for realizing dynamic risk management,” in Commercial Vehicle Technology 2022.   Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2022, pp. 109–120.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com