Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Stability and convergence of the penalty formulation for nonlinear magnetostatics (2403.18285v1)

Published 27 Mar 2024 in math.NA, cs.NA, and math.OC

Abstract: The magnetostatic field distribution in a nonlinear medium amounts to the unique minimizer of the magnetic coenergy over all fields that can be generated by the same current. This is a nonlinear saddlepoint problem whose numerical solution can in principle be achieved by mixed finite element methods and appropriate nonlinear solvers. The saddlepoint structure, however, makes the solution cumbersome. A remedy is to split the magnetic field into a known source field and the gradient of a scalar potential which is governed by a convex minimization problem. The penalty approach avoids the use of artificial potentials and Lagrange multipliers and leads to an unconstrained convex minimization problem involving a large parameter. We provide a rigorous justification of the penalty approach by deriving error estimates for the approximation due to penalization. We further highlight the close connections to the Lagrange-multiplier and scalar potential approach. The theoretical results are illustrated by numerical tests for a typical benchmark problem

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. Meunier, G.: The Finite Element Method for Electromagnetic Modeling. ISTE Wiley (2008)
  2. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 27, 3804–3807 (1991)
  3. Kikuchi, F.: Mixed formulations for finite element analysis of magnetostatic and electrostatic problems. Japan J. Appl. Math. 6, 209–221 (1989)
  4. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
  5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1986)
  6. Monk, P.: Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations. Oxford University Press (2003)
  7. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 1329–1332 (1993)
  8. Engertsberger, F.: The scalar potential approach in nonlinear magnetostatics (2023). Master Thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz
  9. IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 2889–2892 (1994)
  10. Comp. Math. Appl. 79, 2503–2526 (2020)
  11. Zeidler, E.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications - II/B: Nonlinear Monotone Operators. Springer, Berlin (2013)
  12. Arnold, D.N.: Finite Element Exterior Calculus. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, New York (2019)
  13. SISC 39, B703–B731 (2017)
  14. COMPUMAG: TEAM benchmark problems. URL https://www.compumag.org/wp/team
  15. Schöberl, J.: Netgen/NGSolve Software. URL https://ngsolve.org
  16. Math. Comp. Appl. 24, 19 (2019)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.