Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Counting Stars is Constant-Degree Optimal For Detecting Any Planted Subgraph (2403.17766v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in math.ST, cs.CC, cs.DS, and stat.TH

Abstract: We study the computational limits of the following general hypothesis testing problem. Let H=H_n be an \emph{arbitrary} undirected graph on n vertices. We study the detection task between a null'' Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi random graph G(n,p) and aplanted'' random graph which is the union of G(n,p) together with a random copy of H=H_n. Our notion of planted model is a generalization of a plethora of recently studied models initiated with the study of the planted clique model (Jerrum 1992), which corresponds to the special case where H is a k-clique and p=1/2. Over the last decade, several papers have studied the power of low-degree polynomials for limited choices of H's in the above task. In this work, we adopt a unifying perspective and characterize the power of \emph{constant degree} polynomials for the detection task, when \emph{H=H_n is any arbitrary graph} and for \emph{any p=\Omega(1).} Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that the optimal constant degree polynomial is always given by simply \emph{counting stars} in the input random graph. As a direct corollary, we conclude that the class of constant-degree polynomials is only able to ``sense'' the degree distribution of the planted graph H, and no other graph theoretic property of it.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Finding a large hidden clique in a random graph. Random Structures & Algorithms, 13(3-4):457–466, 1998.
  2. Hidden hamiltonian cycle recovery via linear programming. Operations research, 68(1):53–70, 2020.
  3. A nearly tight sum-of-squares lower bound for the planted clique problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 48(2):687–735, 2019.
  4. Reducibility and computational lower bounds for problems with planted sparse structure. In Conference On Learning Theory, pages 48–166. PMLR, 2018.
  5. Statistical and computational phase transitions in group testing. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 4764–4781. PMLR, 2022.
  6. Detection of dense subhypergraphs by low-degree polynomials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08135, 2023.
  7. Low-degree hardness of random optimization problems. In 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 131–140. IEEE, 2020.
  8. Computational lower bounds for community detection on random graphs. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 899–928. PMLR, 2015.
  9. Samuel Hopkins. Statistical inference and the sum of squares method. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 2018.
  10. Wasim Huleihel. Inferring hidden structures in random graphs. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 8:855–867, 2022.
  11. Mark Jerrum. Large cliques elude the metropolis process. Random Structures & Algorithms, 3(4):347–359, 1992.
  12. Sum-of-squares lower bounds for sparse independent set. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 406–416. IEEE, 2022.
  13. Thresholds and expectation thresholds. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 16(3):495–502, 2007.
  14. Notes on computational hardness of hypothesis testing: Predictions using the low-degree likelihood ratio. In ISAAC Congress (International Society for Analysis, its Applications and Computation), pages 1–50. Springer, 2019.
  15. Planting trees in graphs, and finding them back. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 2341–2371. PMLR, 2019.
  16. The planted matching problem: Phase transitions and exact results. The Annals of Applied Probability, 31(6):2663–2720, 2021.
  17. Equivalence of approximate message passing and low-degree polynomials in rank-one matrix estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06996, 2022.
  18. Richard Montgomery. Spanning trees in random graphs. Advances in Mathematics, 356:106793, 2019.
  19. Sharp thresholds in inference of planted subgraphs. In The Thirty Sixth Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 5573–5577. PMLR, 2023.
  20. On the second kahn–kalai conjecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03326, 2022.
  21. A proof of the Kahn–Kalai conjecture. arXiv:2203.17207, 2022.
  22. Lajos Pósa. Hamiltonian circuits in random graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 14(4):359–364, 1976.
  23. Alexander S Wein. Optimal low-degree hardness of maximum independent set. Mathematical Statistics and Learning, 4(3):221–251, 2022.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Xifan Yu (5 papers)
  2. Ilias Zadik (43 papers)
  3. Peiyuan Zhang (24 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.