Emergent Mind

The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Survey

(2403.17333)
Published Mar 26, 2024 in cs.AI , cs.CY , and cs.LG

Abstract

AI models are now being utilized in all facets of our lives such as healthcare, education and employment. Since they are used in numerous sensitive environments and make decisions that can be life altering, potential biased outcomes are a pressing matter. Developers should ensure that such models don't manifest any unexpected discriminatory practices like partiality for certain genders, ethnicities or disabled people. With the ubiquitous dissemination of AI systems, researchers and practitioners are becoming more aware of unfair models and are bound to mitigate bias in them. Significant research has been conducted in addressing such issues to ensure models don't intentionally or unintentionally perpetuate bias. This survey offers a synopsis of the different ways researchers have promoted fairness in AI systems. We explore the different definitions of fairness existing in the current literature. We create a comprehensive taxonomy by categorizing different types of bias and investigate cases of biased AI in different application domains. A thorough study is conducted of the approaches and techniques employed by researchers to mitigate bias in AI models. Moreover, we also delve into the impact of biased models on user experience and the ethical considerations to contemplate when developing and deploying such models. We hope this survey helps researchers and practitioners understand the intricate details of fairness and bias in AI systems. By sharing this thorough survey, we aim to promote additional discourse in the domain of equitable and responsible AI.

Overview

  • The paper provides a comprehensive review of fairness and bias in AI, highlighting the importance of addressing these issues to ensure equitable decision-making in critical areas such as healthcare and criminal justice.

  • Fairness in AI is conceptualized through various categories including group fairness, individual fairness, and causal-based fairness, with strategies for mitigating bias categorized into pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing techniques.

  • The deployment of biased AI systems has negative implications, including unfair treatment and perpetuation of societal inequities, making the development of fair AI systems a socio-ethical imperative.

  • Despite progress in mitigating bias, challenges remain, such as the trade-off between model accuracy and fairness, and the dynamic nature of fairness definitions, underscoring the complex challenge of ensuring fairness in AI.

The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Introduction to Fairness in AI

AI and Machine Learning (ML) models are increasingly embedded in various aspects of human decision-making. While AI models offer substantial benefits due to their ability to digest and analyze large datasets efficiently, concerns about fairness, bias, and discrimination within these models have become prominent. Ensuring fairness is critical, particularly when AI systems influence life-altering decisions in healthcare, criminal justice, employment, and finance. This survey provides an extensive review of the current state of research on fairness and bias in AI, emphasizing the methodologies for identifying, understanding, and mitigating bias to promote fair AI practices.

Defining Fairness and Identifying Bias

Fairness in machine learning can be conceptualized through various lenses, including group fairness, individual fairness, and causal-based fairness. The survey categorizes fairness into distinct categories, each with specific definitions like demographic parity, equality of opportunity, and counterfactual fairness, highlighting the multifaceted nature of fairness.

Bias in AI, much like in the traditional sense, refers to a model's tendency to make decisions that systematically favor or disfavor certain groups based on irrelevant attributes such as race, gender, or age. These biases can manifest at different stages of the ML pipeline, from the initial data collection to the final model evaluation.

Strategies for Mitigating Bias

A broad range of strategies have been proposed to address and mitigate bias in AI models. These strategies can be broadly classified into three categories based on the stage of intervention:

  1. Pre-processing Techniques: Focus on addressing bias in the data before it is used for training models. Techniques such as disparate impact removers and re-weighting aim to alter or re-balance the training data to reduce bias.
  2. In-processing Techniques: Aim to mitigate bias during the model training process. This includes methods like adversarial de-biasing, regularization techniques, and the incorporation of fairness constraints directly into the model's learning algorithm.
  3. Post-processing Techniques: Involve adjusting the model's predictions to ensure fairness. Approaches range from altering the decision threshold for different groups to more sophisticated methods leveraging causal inference.

Practical Implications and Ethical Considerations

The deployment of biased AI systems can lead to unfair treatment of individuals, perpetuate existing societal inequities, and erode trust in AI technologies. Addressing bias in AI not only has significant ethical implications but also ensures that AI systems are inclusive, equitable, and capable of serving diverse populations effectively.

The survey specifically points out several sectors where biased AI models have had tangible negative impacts, highlighting the importance of developing fair AI systems. Examples include racial bias in criminal justice risk assessments and gender bias in hiring algorithms. Mitigating bias, therefore, is not just a technical challenge but a socio-ethical imperative.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite the significant progress in identifying and mitigating bias in AI models, numerous challenges remain. Notably, the trade-off between model accuracy and fairness, the dynamic nature of fairness definitions, and the technical difficulties in achieving fairness across diverse application domains.

Furthermore, the survey discusses the limitations of current mitigation strategies, including the potential for reduced model performance and the challenge of selecting appropriate fairness definitions for given contexts.

Conclusion

The pursuit of fairness in AI is a complex, multifaceted challenge that encompasses technical, ethical, and regulatory dimensions. This survey highlights the critical importance of fairness in AI, reviews the current state of research on mitigating bias in AI models, and discusses the practical and ethical implications of deploying fair AI systems. As AI continues to play a significant role in society, ensuring the fairness of AI models remains a pressing priority for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers alike.

Create an account to read this summary for free:

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.