Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLM (2403.07816v1)

Published 12 Mar 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: We investigate efficient methods for training LLMs to possess capabilities in multiple specialized domains, such as coding, math reasoning and world knowledge. Our method, named Branch-Train-MiX (BTX), starts from a seed model, which is branched to train experts in embarrassingly parallel fashion with high throughput and reduced communication cost. After individual experts are asynchronously trained, BTX brings together their feedforward parameters as experts in Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) layers and averages the remaining parameters, followed by an MoE-finetuning stage to learn token-level routing. BTX generalizes two special cases, the Branch-Train-Merge method, which does not have the MoE finetuning stage to learn routing, and sparse upcycling, which omits the stage of training experts asynchronously. Compared to alternative approaches, BTX achieves the best accuracy-efficiency tradeoff.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
  2. Expert gate: Lifelong learning with a network of experts. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7120–7129, 2016. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:914027.
  3. Program synthesis with large language models. ArXiv, abs/2108.07732, 2021. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237142385.
  4. Continual learning with neural networks: A review. In Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data, pages 362–365, 2019.
  5. Llemma: An open language model for mathematics. ArXiv, abs/2310.10631, 2023. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264172303.
  6. Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 7432–7439, 2020.
  7. Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv, abs/2005.14165, 2020. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:218971783.
  8. Evaluating large language models trained on code. ArXiv, abs/2107.03374, 2021. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235755472.
  9. Think you have solved question answering? Try ARC, the AI2 reasoning challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457, 2018.
  10. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168, 2021.
  11. Deepseekmoe: Towards ultimate expert specialization in mixture-of-experts language models. ArXiv, abs/2401.06066, 2024. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266933338.
  12. Diloco: Distributed low-communication training of language models. ArXiv, abs/2311.08105, 2023. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:265158012.
  13. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(1):5232–5270, 2022.
  14. Gemini Team. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. Team, Gemini and Anil, Rohan and Borgeaud, Sebastian and Wu, Yonghui and Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste and Yu, Jiahui and Soricut, Radu and Schalkwyk, Johan and Dai, Andrew M and Hauth, Anja and others.
  15. Demix layers: Disentangling domains for modular language modeling. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:236976189.
  16. Scaling expert language models with unsupervised domain discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14177, 2023.
  17. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021a. https://openreview.net/forum?id=d7KBjmI3GmQ.
  18. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. ArXiv, abs/2103.03874, 2021b. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232134851.
  19. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3:79–87, 1991. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:572361.
  20. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01144, 2016.
  21. Mixtral of experts. ArXiv, abs/2401.04088, 2024. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266844877.
  22. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. ArXiv, abs/1705.03551, 2017. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:26501419.
  23. Sparse upcycling: Training mixture-of-experts from dense checkpoints. ArXiv, abs/2212.05055, 2022. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254535822.
  24. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  25. A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44:3366–3385, 2019. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:218889912.
  26. Base layers: Simplifying training of large, sparse models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232428341.
  27. Branch-train-merge: Embarrassingly parallel training of expert language models. ArXiv, abs/2208.03306, 2022a. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:251371375.
  28. Competition-level code generation with alphacode. Science, 378:1092 – 1097, 2022b. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246527904.
  29. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. ArXiv, abs/2203.02155, 2022. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246426909.
  30. Hash layers for large sparse models. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235367626.
  31. Code llama: Open foundation models for code. ArXiv, abs/2308.12950, 2023. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261100919.
  32. Progressive neural networks. ArXiv, abs/1606.04671, 2016. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15350923.
  33. Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale. Communications of the ACM, 64(9):99–106, 2021.
  34. Socialiqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09728, 2019.
  35. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. ArXiv, abs/2402.03300, 2024. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267412607.
  36. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. ArXiv, abs/1701.06538, 2017. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12462234.
  37. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, 2023.
  38. Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time. ArXiv, abs/2203.05482, 2022. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247362886.
  39. Openmoe: An early effort on open mixture-of-experts language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01739, 2024.
  40. Deep learning with elastic averaging sgd. In C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 28. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/file/d18f655c3fce66ca401d5f38b48c89af-Paper.pdf.
  41. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. ArXiv, abs/2205.01068, 2022. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248496292.
  42. Llama beyond english: An empirical study on language capability transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01055, 2024.
Citations (42)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces BTX, which branches a seed LLM to efficiently train domain-specific experts in parallel before unifying them with a MoE framework.
  • It leverages embarrassingly parallel training to significantly reduce resource costs while enhancing performance across diverse specialized domains.
  • The approach enables effective token-level routing through fine-tuning, paving the way for scalable, high-performing LLM applications.

Enhancing LLMs with Branch-Train-MiX: A New Approach for Specialized Domains

Introduction to Branch-Train-MiX (BTX)

Training LLMs that excel across multiple specialized domains has posed a significant challenge, traditionally requiring substantial compute resources and complex training procedures. A novel method, Branch-Train-MiX (BTX), offers an efficient solution by branching a seed model to train multiple experts in parallel across various domains, such as coding and math, followed by mixing these experts into a unified Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model. This approach not only leverages the embarrassingly parallel advantage for high-throughput training but also integrates the specialized capabilities of individual experts into a singular, coherent model that can be fine-tuned for token-level routing. BTX stands out by delivering improved accuracy-efficiency compared to existing methodologies, carving a new path in LLM training paradigms.

Novelty and Efficiency of the BTX Methodology

BTX introduces a three-step process: Branch, Train, and MiX, combining the benefits of Branch-Train-Merge and Mixture-of-Experts models while addressing their respective drawbacks. Initially, the model is branched into multiple experts, each undergoing separate, parallel training on domain-specific datasets. These independently trained experts are then mixed through an MoE architecture, integrating feedforward layers from all experts into a single module, and blending other parameters by averaging. The MoE model undergoes further fine-tuning, allowing the router to effectively choose the most relevant expert responses based on the input context.

One of the critical innovations of BTX is its embarrassingly parallel expert training phase, reducing communication costs and increasing throughput. Moreover, BTX's fine-tuning stage enables the unified network to operate as any standard LLM, ready for additional training or practical applications, without significantly increasing inference costs despite its expanded parameter size.

Implications and Future Directions

The BTX method brings forth several theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, it provides a robust framework for understanding how parallel training of domain-specific experts can be effectively integrated into a singular LLM, offering insights into mixture-of-experts architectures and their capacity for domain adaptation. Practically, BTX showcases a potential reduction in resources and time required to train multifaceted LLMs capable of high performance across various domains.

Future exploration could dive deeper into optimizing the BTX process, such as investigating the optimal number of domains, the impact of different domain combinations, and refining the router's efficiency in expert selection. Additionally, exploring the extendibility of BTX in incorporating human feedback or supervising fine-tuning stages could unveil further enhancements in model alignment and performance.

Conclusion

The Branch-Train-MiX method represents a significant step forward in training LLMs adept across multiple domains. By efficiently merging the strengths of parallel expert training and mixture-of-experts models, BTX not only achieves high performance but also introduces a scalable and resource-effective approach suitable for the evolving demands of AI applications. As we continue to push the boundaries of what LLMs can achieve, BTX offers a compelling blueprint for future advancements in the field.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube