Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Portraying the Need for Temporal Data in Flood Detection via Sentinel-1 (2403.03671v1)

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.CV and eess.IV

Abstract: Identifying flood affected areas in remote sensing data is a critical problem in earth observation to analyze flood impact and drive responses. While a number of methods have been proposed in the literature, there are two main limitations in available flood detection datasets: (1) a lack of region variability is commonly observed and/or (2) they require to distinguish permanent water bodies from flooded areas from a single image, which becomes an ill-posed setup. Consequently, we extend the globally diverse MMFlood dataset to multi-date by providing one year of Sentinel-1 observations around each flood event. To our surprise, we notice that the definition of flooded pixels in MMFlood is inconsistent when observing the entire image sequence. Hence, we re-frame the flood detection task as a temporal anomaly detection problem, where anomalous water bodies are segmented from a Sentinel-1 temporal sequence. From this definition, we provide a simple method inspired by the popular video change detector ViBe, results of which quantitatively align with the SAR image time series, providing a reasonable baseline for future works.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. “Mmflood: A multimodal dataset for flood delineation from satellite imagery,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 96774–96787, 2022.
  2. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) CfRotEo, “Disaster year in review 2020: Global trends and perspectives,” 2021.
  3. “Drivers of future fluvial flood risk change for residential buildings in europe,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 76, pp. 102559, 2022.
  4. “Remote sensing methods for flood prediction: A review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 960, 2022.
  5. “An exploratory study of sentinel-1 sar for rapid urban flood mapping on google earth engine,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 113, pp. 103002, 2022.
  6. “Near real-time flood detection in urban and rural areas using high-resolution synthetic aperture radar images,” IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 3041–3052, 2012.
  7. “Deep learning methods for flood mapping: a review of existing applications and future research directions,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 4345–4378, 2022.
  8. “Exploring sentinel-1 and sentinel-2 diversity for flood inundation mapping using deep learning,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 180, pp. 163–173, 2021.
  9. “Flood detection in time series of optical and sar images,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 43, no. B2, pp. 1343–1346, 2020.
  10. “Flood event detection from sentinel 1 and sentinel 2 data: Does land use matter for performance of u-net based flood segmenters?,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 2022, pp. 4860–4867.
  11. “Vibe: A universal background subtraction algorithm for video sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Image processing, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1709–1724, 2010.
  12. “Sen1floods11: A georeferenced dataset to train and test deep learning flood algorithms for sentinel-1,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020, pp. 210–211.
  13. “Subsense: A universal change detection method with local adaptive sensitivity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 359–373, 2014.
  14. “Analysis and effects of speckle noise in sar images,” in 2016 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA) (Fall), 2016, pp. 1–5.
  15. “Ground visibility in satellite optical time series based on a contrario local image matching,” Image Processing On Line, vol. 11, pp. 212–233, 2021.
  16. “Reviewing vibe, a popular background subtraction algorithm for real-time applications,” Image Processing On Line, vol. 12, pp. 527–549, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.