La Révolution Dévore ses Enfants: Pricing Implications of Transformative Agreements (2403.03597v2)
Abstract: With the widespread dissemination of the internet, academia envisioned free availability and rapid dissemination of new knowledge. However, most researchers continued publishing in established journals instead of switching to fully open-access alternatives. That preserved the market power of the large commercial publishing houses owning thousands of journals behind paywalls. To turn these portfolios into open access, research institutions around the globe have been negotiating `transformative agreements:' Papers are published fully open access, and universities pay only for the publication but not for subscriptions any longer. In this paper, I demonstrate that publishers controlling a large stock of paywalled publications can use them as leverage to ensure high revenues even with decreasing publication numbers. By that, this industrial policy may harm competitors that only publish under open access. This could harm competition and perpetuate the position of the incumbent players.
- “Contracts as a Barrier to Entry” In The American Economic Review 77.3, 1987, pp. 388–401
- Mark Armstrong “Opening Access to Research” In The Economic Journal 125.586, 2015, pp. F1–F30 DOI: “url–10.1111/ecoj.12254
- Mark Armstrong “Plan S: An economist’s perspective” In Managerial and Decision Economics 42.8, 2021, pp. 2017–2026 DOI: “url–10.1002/mde.3440
- Sadanand Y. Bansode and Sunita Pujar “Open access and transformative agreements: A study” In Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS) 61.1, 2022, pp. 59–65 DOI: “url–10.56042/alis.v69i1.57094
- Jeffrey Beall “Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access” In Learned Publishing, 26.2 Association of LearnedProfessional Society Publishers, 2013, pp. 79–84
- Theodore C Bergstrom “Free labor for costly journals?” In Journal of Economic Perspectives 15.4 American Economic Association, 2001, pp. 183–198
- “Evaluating big deal journal bundles” In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111.26, 2014, pp. 9425–9430 DOI: “url–10.1073/pnas.1403006111
- Bo-Christer Björk “Scholarly journal publishing in transition-from restricted to open access” In Electronic Markets 27.2 Springer, 2017, pp. 101–109
- John Bohannon “Who’s afraid of peer review?” In Science 342 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2013, pp. 60–65
- Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild and Rüdiger Mutz “Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases” In Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8.1, 2021, pp. 1–15 DOI: “url–10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w
- Ángel Borrego “Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review” In Learned Publishing 36.3, 2023, pp. 359–378
- Ángel Borrego, Lluís Anglada and Ernest Abadal “Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access?” In Learned Publishing 34.2, 2021, pp. 216–232 DOI: “url–10.1002/leap.1347
- “Drivers of article processing charges in open access” In Scientometrics 124.3, 2020, pp. 2185–2206 DOI: “url–10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3
- Stephen Buranyi “Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?” Published June 27, 2017, last checked June 26, 2023 In The Guardian, 2017 URL: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science
- “The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges” In Quantitative Science Studies 4.4, 2023, pp. 778–799
- “Nonlinear pricing and exclusion:II. Must-stock products” In The RAND Journal of Economics 47.3, 2016, pp. 631–660 DOI: “url–10.1111/1756-2171.12138
- “Pricing of Scientific Journals and Market Power” In Journal of the European Economic Association 5.2-3, 2007, pp. 400–410 DOI: 10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.400
- “Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted: Lessons learned” In College & Research Libraries News 82.7, 2021, pp. 298 DOI: “url–10.5860/crln.82.7.298
- “No deal: German researchers’ publishing and citing behaviors after Big Deal negotiations with Elsevier” In Quantitative Science Studies 4.2 MIT Press, 2023, pp. 325–352
- “Publish or Perish? The Increasing Importance of Publications for Prospective Economics Professors in Austria, Germany and Switzerland” In German Economic Review 9.4, 2008, pp. 457–472 DOI: “url–10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00448.x
- Justus Haucap, Nima Moshgbar and W.Benedikt Schmal “The impact of the German ’DEAL’ on competition in the academic publishing market” In Managerial and Decision Economics 42.8, 2021, pp. 2027–2049 DOI: “url–10.1002/mde.3493
- James J. Heckman and Sidharth Moktan “Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five” In Journal of Economic Literature 58.2, 2020, pp. 419–470 DOI: “url–10.1257/jel.20191574
- “Research: Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature” e32822 In eLife, 2018
- Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe “Read-and-publish? Publish-and-read? A primer on transformative agreements” Published April 23, 2019, last checked June 26, 2023 Scholarly Kitchen, 2019 URL: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/04/23/transformative-agreements/
- Jared Hoppenfeld and Michael M. Smith “Information-Seeking Behaviors of Business Faculty” In Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 19.1, 2014, pp. 1–14 DOI: “url–10.1080/08963568.2014.852906
- Najko Jahn “How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18255, 2024
- “The Pricing of Academic Journals: A Two-Sided Market Perspective” In American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2.2, 2010, pp. 222–255 DOI: “url–10.1257/mic.2.2.222
- Graham Kendall “Beall’s legacy in the battle against predatory publishers” In Learned Publishing 34.3 Wiley Online Library, 2021, pp. 379–388
- Liat Klain Gabbay and Snunith Shoham “The role of academic libraries in research and teaching” In Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51.3, 2019, pp. 721–736 DOI: “url–10.1177/0961000617742462
- Kai Kupferschmidt “Deal reveals what scientists in Germany are paying for open access” Published February 21, 2019, last checked June 28, 2023. In Science, 2019 DOI: 10.1126/science.aax1064
- “Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study” In Journal of Informetrics 10.4, 2016, pp. 919–932 DOI: “url–10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002
- Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein and Philippe Mongeon “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era” In PloS one 10.6 Public Library of Science, 2015, pp. e0127502
- Mark J. McCabe and Christopher M. Snyder “The economics of open-access journals” Working Paper 193, 2004
- Mark J. McCabe and Christopher M. Snyder “Open Access and Academic Journal Quality” In American Economic Review 95.2, 2005, pp. 453–458
- Mark J. McCabe, Christopher M. Snyder and Anna Fagin “Open access versus traditional journal pricing: Using a simple “platform market” model to understand which will win (and which should)” In The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39.1 Elsevier, 2013, pp. 11–19
- Vladimir M. Moskovkin, Tatyana V. Saprykina and Igor V. Boichuk “Transformative agreements in the development of open access” In Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 34.3, 2022, pp. 165–207 DOI: “url–10.1080/1941126X.2022.2099000
- Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher “Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach” In Journal of Documentation 78.7, 2022, pp. 450–463 DOI: “url–10.1108/JD-04-2022-0083
- Stephan Puehringer, Johanna Rath and Teresa Griesebner “The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good” In PLoS One 16.6, 2021, pp. e0253226 DOI: “url–10.1371/journal.pone.0253226
- Ian Sample “Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices” Published April 24, 2012, last checked June 26, 2023 In The Guardian, 2012 URL: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers-prices
- W Benedikt Schmal, Justus Haucap and Leon Knoke “The role of gender and coauthors in academic publication behavior” In Research Policy 52, 2023
- W.Benedikt Schmal “The X Factor: Open Access, New Journals, and Incumbent Competitors” KU Leuven In MSI Discussion Paper No. 2307, 2023
- W.Benedikt Schmal “How Transformative are Transformative Agreements? Evidence from Germany Across Disciplines” forthcoming In Scientometrics, 2024
- “The oligopoly of open access publishing” In Scientometrics 129 Springer, 2024, pp. 519–536
- “Sustainability of open access citation advantage: the case of Elsevier’s author-pays hybrid open access journals” In Scientometrics 115.1, 2018, pp. 563–576 DOI: “url–10.1007/s11192-018-2663-4
- Wadim Strielkowski “Will the rise of Sci-Hub pave the road for the subscription-based access to publishing databases?” In Information Development 33.5, 2017, pp. 540–542
- Peter Suber “Open Access” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012 URL: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/10752204/9780262517638_Open_Access.pdf?sequence=1
- Hendrik P. van Dalen “How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists” In Scientometrics 126.2, 2021, pp. 1675–1694 DOI: “url–10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x
- Peter van den Besselaar and Ulf Sandström “Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions” In Journal of Informetrics 9.4, 2015, pp. 826–838 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.011
- Joel Waldfogel “How digitization has created a golden age of music, movies, books, and television” In Journal of Economic Perspectives 31.3 American Economic Association 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203-2418, 2017, pp. 195–214
- Xijie Zhang, Thomas Grebel and Oliver Budzinski “The Prices of Open Access Publishing: The Composition of APC across Different Fields of Sciences” In Zur Ökonomik von Sport, Entertainment und Medien, Schriften zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2021, pp. 317–336 DOI: “url–10.1515/9783110724523-014