Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Navigation and Control of Unconventional VTOL UAVs in Forward-Flight with Explicit Wind Velocity Estimation (2403.00076v1)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: This paper presents a solution for the state estimation and control problems for a class of unconventional vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) UAVs operating in forward-flight conditions. A tightly-coupled state estimation approach is used to estimate the aircraft navigation states, sensor biases, and the wind velocity. State estimation is done within a matrix Lie group framework using the Invariant Extended Kalman Filter (IEKF), which offers several advantages compared to standard multiplicative EKFs traditionally used in aerospace and robotics problems. An SO(3)- based attitude controller is employed, leading to a single attitude control law without a separate sideslip control loop. A control allocator is used to determine how to use multiple, possibly redundant, actuators to produce the desired control moments. The wind velocity estimates are used in the attitude controller and the control allocator to improve performance. A numerical example is considered using a sample VTOL tailsitter-type UAV with four control surfaces. Monte-Carlo simulations demonstrate robustness of the proposed control and estimation scheme to various initial conditions, noise levels, and flight trajectories.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. A. Bacchini and E. Cestino, “Electric VTOL Configurations Comparison,” Aerospace, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 26, 2019.
  2. A. S. Saeed, A. B. Younes, S. Islam, J. Dias, L. Seneviratne, and G. Cai, “A Review on the Platform Design, Dynamic Modeling and Control of Hybrid UAVs,” in International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 806–815, IEEE, 2015.
  3. H. Alwi and C. Edwards, “Fault Tolerant Control Using Sliding Modes with Online Control Allocation,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1859–1866, 2008.
  4. T. A. Johansen and T. I. Fossen, “Control Allocation - a Survey,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1087–1103, 2013.
  5. A. Wenz, T. A. Johansen, and A. Cristofaro, “Combining Model-Free and Model-Based Angle of Attack Estimation for Small Fixed-Wing UAVs Using a Standard Sensor Suite,” in International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 624–632, 2016.
  6. J. H. Lee, H. E. Sevil, A. Dogan, and D. Hullender, “Estimation of Maneuvering Aircraft States and Time-Varying Wind with Turbulence,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2013.
  7. A. Cho, J. Kim, S. Lee, and C. Kee, “Wind Estimation and Airspeed Calibration Using a UAV With a Single-Antenna GPS Receiver and Pitot Tube,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2011.
  8. M. Brossard, J.-P. Condomines, and S. Bonnabel, “Tightly Coupled Navigation and Wind Estimation for Mini UAVs,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 1843–1862, 2018.
  9. A. Barrau, Nonlinear State Error Based Extended Kalman Filters with Applications to Navigation. PhD thesis, Mines ParisTech, 2015.
  10. A. Barrau and S. Bonnabel, “The Invariant Extended Kalman Filter as a Stable Observer,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1797–1812, 2016.
  11. A. Barrau and S. Bonnabel, “Three Examples of the Stability Properties of the Invariant Extended Kalman Filter,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 431–437, 2017.
  12. J. Arsenault, “Practical Considerations and Extensions of the Invariant Extended Kalman Filtering Framework,” Master’s thesis, McGill University, 2019.
  13. T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. McClamroch, “Geometric Tracking Control of a Quadrotor UAV on S⁢E⁢(3)𝑆𝐸3{SE(3)}italic_S italic_E ( 3 ),” in 49th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 5420–5425, 2010.
  14. D. Mellinger and V. Kumar, “Minimum Snap Trajectory Generation and Control for Quadrotors,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2520–2525, 2011.
  15. E. Oland and R. Kristiansen, “Quaternion-Based Backstepping Control of a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” in IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–7, 2013.
  16. P. C. Hughes, Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics. Dover Publications, 2004.
  17. D. Bernstein, “Newton’s Frames,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 17–18, 2008.
  18. W. Khan and M. Nahon, “Modeling Dynamics of Agile Fixed-Wing UAVs for Real-Time Applications,” International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 1303–1312, 2016.
  19. W. Khan, Dynamics Modeling of Agile Fixed-Wing. PhD thesis, McGill University, 2016.
  20. A. Ansari and D. S. Bernstein, “Retrospective Cost Adaptive Control of Generic Transport Model Under Uncertainty and Failure,” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 123–174, 2017.
  21. J. Yan, J. B. Hoagg, R. E. Hindman, and D. S. Bernstein, “Longitudinal Aircraft Dynamics and the Instantaneous Acceleration Center of Rotation,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 68–92, 2011.
  22. B. C. Hall, “Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations,” in Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, pp. 333–366, Springer, 2013.
  23. E. Eade, “Lie Groups for Computer Vision.” http://ethaneade.com/lie_groups.pdf, 2014 (accessed September 2nd, 2019).
  24. S. Heo and C. G. Park, “Consistent EKF-Based Visual-Inertial Odometry on Matrix Lie Group,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 3780–3788, 2018.
  25. S. Bonnable, P. Martin, and E. Salaün, “Invariant Extended Kalman Filter: Theory and Application to a Velocity-Aided Attitude Estimation Problem,” in 48h Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with Chinese Control Conference, pp. 1297–1304, 2009.
  26. M. W. Oppenheimer, D. Ph, and D. B. Doman, “Control Allocation for Overactuated Systems,” 2006.
  27. R. W. Beard and T. W. McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, 2012.
  28. S. Park, J. Deyst, and J. How, “A New Nonlinear Guidance Logic for Trajectory Tracking,” in AIAA Guidance, Gavigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, pp. 4900–4916, 2004.
  29. J.-M. Kai, T. Hamel, and C. Samson, “A Unified Approach to Fixed-Wing Aircraft Path Following Guidance and Control,” Automatica, vol. 108, p. 108491, 2019.
  30. T. Lee, “Geometric Tracking Control of the Attitude Dynamics of a Rigid Body on S⁢O⁢(3)𝑆𝑂3{SO(3)}italic_S italic_O ( 3 ),” in American Control Conference, pp. 1200–1205, 2011.
Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube