Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mixer is more than just a model (2402.18007v2)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.SD, and eess.AS

Abstract: Recently, MLP structures have regained popularity, with MLP-Mixer standing out as a prominent example. In the field of computer vision, MLP-Mixer is noted for its ability to extract data information from both channel and token perspectives, effectively acting as a fusion of channel and token information. Indeed, Mixer represents a paradigm for information extraction that amalgamates channel and token information. The essence of Mixer lies in its ability to blend information from diverse perspectives, epitomizing the true concept of "mixing" in the realm of neural network architectures. Beyond channel and token considerations, it is possible to create more tailored mixers from various perspectives to better suit specific task requirements. This study focuses on the domain of audio recognition, introducing a novel model named Audio Spectrogram Mixer with Roll-Time and Hermit FFT (ASM-RH) that incorporates insights from both time and frequency domains. Experimental results demonstrate that ASM-RH is particularly well-suited for audio data and yields promising outcomes across multiple classification tasks. The models and optimal weights files will be published.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  2. “Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention,” 2020.
  3. “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10012–10022.
  4. “Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 12009–12019.
  5. “Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 24261–24272, 2021.
  6. “Pay attention to mlps,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 9204–9215, 2021.
  7. “Resmlp: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient training,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 5314–5321, 2022.
  8. “Mts-mixers: Multivariate time series forecasting via factorized temporal and channel mixing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04501, 2023.
  9. “Metaformer is actually what you need for vision,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 10819–10829.
  10. “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778.
  11. “Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211–252, 2015.
  12. “When shift operation meets vision transformer: An extremely simple alternative to attention mechanism,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, vol. 36, pp. 2423–2430.
  13. “Ast: Audio spectrogram transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01778, 2021.
  14. “Ssast: Self-supervised audio spectrogram transformer,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, vol. 36, pp. 10699–10709.
  15. “Flexiast: Flexibility is what ast needs,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2307.09286, 2023.
  16. “Asm: Audio spectrogram mixer,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2401.11102, 2024.
  17. “Shift: A zero flop, zero parameter alternative to spatial convolutions,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun 2018.
  18. “Constructing fast network through deconstruction of convolution,” arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, May 2018.
  19. “S22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT-mlp: Spatial-shift mlp architecture for vision,” Cornell University - arXiv,Cornell University - arXiv, Jun 2021.
  20. Pete Warden, “Speech commands: A dataset for limited-vocabulary speech recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03209, 2018.
  21. “Sound classification using convolutional neural networks,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets (CCEM). IEEE, 2018, pp. 81–84.
  22. “Speech emotion recognition based on svm and ann,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 198–202, 2018.
  23. “Eranns: Efficient residual audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 161, pp. 38–44, 2022.
  24. “The ryerson audio-visual database of emotional speech and song (ravdess): A dynamic, multimodal set of facial and vocal expressions in north american english,” PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–35, 05 2018.
  25. “Activemlp: An mlp-like architecture with active token mixer,” arXiv: 2203.06108, 2022.
  26. “Active token mixer,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, vol. 37, pp. 2759–2767.
  27. “Adaptive frequency filters as efficient global token mixers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 6049–6059.
  28. “How can large language models understand spatial-temporal data?,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2401.14192, 2024.

Summary

  • The paper introduces ASM-RH, a neural network that adapts the MLP-Mixer design for audio spectrograms by integrating time and frequency domain analyses.
  • It demonstrates a Roll-Time module that captures temporal dependencies, suggesting potential strategies for modeling long-range text correlations in compression.
  • The Hermit FFT module exploits frequency characteristics to inspire efficient pattern extraction methods, offering new insights for lossless text data compression.

The paper "Mixer is more than just a model" introduces a novel neural network architecture, the Audio Spectrogram Mixer with Roll-Time and Hermit FFT (ASM-RH), for audio classification tasks. It builds upon the MLP-Mixer architecture, initially proposed for computer vision, and adapts it to the specifics of audio data by incorporating time and frequency domain insights. The core idea is to move away from the channel and token perspectives traditionally used in computer vision and instead process audio spectrograms from time and frequency angles.

Here's how this paper could be relevant to lossless text data compression:

  1. Information Mixing Paradigms: The paper emphasizes that the "Mixer" architecture is not just a model but a paradigm for blending information from diverse perspectives. In text compression, this could translate to designing models that mix information from different levels of abstraction (e.g., character, word, sentence) or different feature representations (e.g., statistical, linguistic).
  2. Time-Domain Awareness: The Roll-Time-mixing module is designed to capture temporal dependencies in audio. Analogously, text compression could benefit from mechanisms that explicitly model long-range dependencies between words or phrases, similar to how LSTMs or Transformers are used in NLP. The RollBlock approach of reinstating discarded data to maintain integrity could inspire methods that avoid losing crucial contextual information during compression.
  3. Frequency-Domain Analysis: The Hermit-Frequency-mixing module leverages frequency domain characteristics of audio using FFT. While text doesn't have a direct "frequency" equivalent, this concept could be extended to identify recurring patterns or motifs in text data that can be efficiently encoded. Techniques like Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT) already exploit pattern repetition but new transforms inspired by frequency analysis could potentially reveal novel redundancies.
  4. Adaptation to Data Characteristics: The ASM-RH model is tailored to audio data. Similarly, text compression algorithms can be adapted to specific types of text (e.g., source code, natural language, genomic sequences) to improve compression ratios. The paper encourages researchers to develop high-quality models that capture and mix information from multiple perspectives relevant to the data at hand.
  5. Beyond Entropy Limits: While the paper doesn't directly address entropy limits, the idea of "mixing" information from different perspectives could potentially lead to compression schemes that go beyond traditional entropy bounds. This might involve exploiting higher-order dependencies or incorporating external knowledge about the text.
  6. Algorithmic Efficiency: The paper emphasizes the efficiency of the RollBlock module, which extracts information without adding parameters or FLOPs. This is crucial for practical compression algorithms, where encoding and decoding speed are important considerations. Lossless compression strives to approach entropy limits but the computational cost can be a barrier. Shift operations, as a low-cost alternative to attention, could provide a good trade-off between compression ratio and speed.
  7. Comparison with Existing Methods: Established methods like Huffman coding and arithmetic coding are widely used for text compression. The "Mixer" approach could be viewed as a more sophisticated way to estimate the probabilities used in these methods, potentially leading to better compression ratios. The adaptability of ASM-RH suggests that a "Mixer"-based compressor could dynamically adjust its model based on the input text.

Potential improvements and future research directions for enhancing lossless text data compression based on the ideas in this paper:

  • Develop "Mixer" architectures that combine statistical and linguistic information for text compression.
  • Explore novel transforms inspired by frequency analysis to identify redundancies in text.
  • Design adaptive compression algorithms that tailor their models to specific types of text.
  • Investigate the use of shift operations or other efficient information extraction techniques to improve the speed of compression and decompression.
  • Evaluate the performance of "Mixer"-based compression algorithms on various text datasets and compare them with existing methods like gzip, bzip2, and LZMA.
  • Explore the theoretical limits of compression achievable with "Mixer" architectures and investigate whether they can surpass traditional entropy bounds.
File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown