Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Door and Drawer Reset Mechanisms: Automated Mechanisms for Testing and Data Collection (2402.16759v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Robotic manipulation in human environments is a challenging problem for researchers and industry alike. In particular, opening doors/drawers can be challenging for robots, as the size, shape, actuation and required force is variable. Because of this, it can be difficult to collect large real-world datasets and to benchmark different control algorithms on the same hardware. In this paper we present two automated testbeds, the Door Reset Mechanism (DORM) and Drawer Reset Mechanism (DWRM), for the purpose of real world testing and data collection. These devices are low-cost, are sensorized, operate with customized variable resistance, and come with open source software. Additionally, we provide a dataset of over 600 grasps using the DORM and DWRM. We use this dataset to highlight how much variability can exist even with the same trial on the same hardware. This data can also serve as a source for real-world noise in simulation environments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Y. Karayiannidis, C. Smith, F. E. V. Barrientos, P. Ögren, and D. Kragic, “An adaptive control approach for opening doors and drawers under uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 161–175, 2016.
  2. L. Mochurad, Y. Hladun, Y. Zasoba, and M. Gregus, “An Approach for Opening Doors with a Mobile Robot Using Machine Learning Methods,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 69, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/7/2/69
  3. Y. Urakami, A. Hodgkinson, C. Carlin, R. Leu, L. Rigazio, and P. Abbeel, “DoorGym: A Scalable Door Opening Environment And Baseline Agent,” May 2022, arXiv:1908.01887 [cs]. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01887
  4. O. Kroemer, S. Niekum, and G. Konidaris, “A review of robot learning for manipulation: Challenges, representations, and algorithms,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 22, no. 1, jan 2021.
  5. W. Zhao, J. P. Queralta, and T. Westerlund, “Sim-to-real transfer in deep reinforcement learning for robotics: a survey,” in 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), 2020, pp. 737–744.
  6. H. R. Kam, S.-h. Lee, T. Park, and C.-h. Kim, “Rviz: a toolkit for real domain data visualization,” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 337–345, 10 2015.
  7. S. James, Z. Ma, D. R. Arrojo, and A. J. Davison, “Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3019–3026, 2020.
  8. Y. Zhu, J. Wong, A. Mandlekar, R. Martín-Martín, A. Joshi, S. Nasiriany, and Y. Zhu, “robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learning,” Nov. 2022, arXiv:2009.12293 [cs]. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12293
  9. Z. Ding, Y.-Y. Tsai, W. W. Lee, and B. Huang, “Sim-to-Real Transfer for Robotic Manipulation with Tactile Sensory,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sep. 2021, pp. 6778–6785, iSSN: 2153-0866.
  10. S. Gu, E. Holly, T. Lillicrap, and S. Levine, “Deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation with asynchronous off-policy updates,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   Singapore, Singapore: IEEE, May 2017, pp. 3389–3396. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7989385/
  11. S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, and D. Quillen, “Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection,” CoRR, vol. abs/1603.02199, 2016.
  12. L. Pinto and A. Gupta, “Supersizing self-supervision: Learning to grasp from 50k tries and 700 robot hours,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, pp. 3406–3413.
  13. K. DuFrene, K. Nave, J. Campbell, R. Balasubramanian, and C. Grimm, “The grasp reset mechanism: An automated apparatus for conducting grasping trials,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://osurobotics.github.io/Physical-Robotic-Manipulation-Test-Facility/docs/Papers/grasp-reset-mechanism.html
  14. P. Schillinger, “Flexbe behavior engine.” [Online]. Available: http://philserver.bplaced.net/fbe/
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.