Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PUAD: Frustratingly Simple Method for Robust Anomaly Detection (2402.15143v1)

Published 23 Feb 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Developing an accurate and fast anomaly detection model is an important task in real-time computer vision applications. There has been much research to develop a single model that detects either structural or logical anomalies, which are inherently distinct. The majority of the existing approaches implicitly assume that the anomaly can be represented by identifying the anomalous location. However, we argue that logical anomalies, such as the wrong number of objects, can not be well-represented by the spatial feature maps and require an alternative approach. In addition, we focused on the possibility of detecting logical anomalies by using an out-of-distribution detection approach on the feature space, which aggregates the spatial information of the feature map. As a demonstration, we propose a method that incorporates a simple out-of-distribution detection method on the feature space against state-of-the-art reconstruction-based approaches. Despite the simplicity of our proposal, our method PUAD (Picturable and Unpicturable Anomaly Detection) achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MVTec LOCO AD dataset.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. “Encoding structure-texture relation with p-net for anomaly detection in retinal images,” in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020, pp. 360–377.
  2. “f-anogan: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,” Medical image analysis, vol. 54, pp. 30–44, 2019.
  3. “Detecting the unexpected via image resynthesis,” in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019, pp. 2152–2161.
  4. “Sub-image anomaly detection with deep pyramid correspondences,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02357, 2020.
  5. “Mvtec ad — a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019, pp. 9584–9592.
  6. “Beyond dents and scratches: Logical constraints in unsupervised anomaly detection and localization,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 947–969, 2022.
  7. “Modeling the distribution of normal data in pre-trained deep features for anomaly detection,” in International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2021, pp. 6726–6733.
  8. “Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 14318–14328.
  9. “Set features for fine-grained anomaly detection,” CoRR, vol. abs/2302.12245, 2023.
  10. “Padim: A patch distribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization,” International Workshop on Industrial Machine Learning International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 475–489, 2021.
  11. “Component-aware anomaly detection framework for adjustable and logical industrial visual inspection,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 58, pp. 102161, 2023.
  12. “Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 4183–4192.
  13. “Efficientad: Accurate visual anomaly detection at millisecond-level latencies,” in IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2023, pp. 128–138.
  14. “Improving unsupervised defect segmentation by applying structural similarity to autoencoders,” in International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP), 2019, pp. 372–380.
  15. “Reconstruction by inpainting for visual anomaly detection,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 112, pp. 107706, 2021.
  16. “DrÆm – a discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection,” in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 8310–8319.
  17. “Reconstruction from edge image combined with color and gradient difference for industrial surface anomaly detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14485, 2022.
  18. “Normal reference attention and defective feature perception network for surface defect detection,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–14, 2023.
  19. “”unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery”,” in ”Information Processing in Medical Imaging”, ”2017”, pp. ”146–157”.
Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

GitHub