Emergent Mind

Abstract

Fact-checking is an effective approach to combat misinformation on social media, especially regarding significant social events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the U.S. presidential elections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Google Fact Check, a fact-checking search engine. By analyzing the search results regarding 1,000 COVID-19-related false claims, we found Google Fact Check not likely to provide sufficient fact-checking information for most false claims, even though the results obtained are generally reliable and helpful. We also found that the corresponding false claims of different fact-checking verdicts (i.e., "False", "Partly False", "True", and "Unratable") tend to reflect diverse emotional tones, and fact-checking sources are likely to check the claims in different lengths and using dictionary words to various extents. Claims addressing the same issue yet described differently are likely to obtain disparate fact-checking results. This research aims to shed light on the best practices for performing fact-checking searches for the general public.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.