Few shot clinical entity recognition in three languages: Masked language models outperform LLM prompting

LLMs are becoming the go-to solution for many natural language processing tasks, including in specialized domains where their few-shot capacities are expected to yield high performance in low-resource settings. Herein, we aim to assess the performance of LLMs for few shot clinical entity recognition in multiple languages. We evaluate named entity recognition in English, French and Spanish using 8 in-domain (clinical) and 6 out-domain gold standard corpora. We assess the performance of 10 auto-regressive language models using prompting and 16 masked language models used for text encoding in a biLSTM-CRF supervised tagger. We create a few-shot set-up by limiting the amount of annotated data available to 100 sentences. Our experiments show that although larger prompt-based models tend to achieve competitive F-measure for named entity recognition outside the clinical domain, this level of performance does not carry over to the clinical domain where lighter supervised taggers relying on masked language models perform better, even with the performance drop incurred from the few-shot set-up. In all experiments, the CO2 impact of masked language models is inferior to that of auto-regressive models. Results are consistent over the three languages and suggest that few-shot learning using Large language models is not production ready for named entity recognition in the clinical domain. Instead, models could be used for speeding-up the production of gold standard annotated data.