Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 64 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Machine Learning Ensemble Model for the Detection of Cyberbullying (2402.12538v1)

Published 19 Feb 2024 in cs.SI and cs.LG

Abstract: The pervasive use of social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, and X, has significantly amplified our electronic interconnectedness. Moreover, these platforms are now easily accessible from any location at any given time. However, the increased popularity of social media has also led to cyberbullying.It is imperative to address the need for finding, monitoring, and mitigating cyberbullying posts on social media platforms. Motivated by this necessity, we present this paper to contribute to developing an automated system for detecting binary labels of aggressive tweets.Our study has demonstrated remarkable performance compared to previous experiments on the same dataset. We employed the stacking ensemble machine learning method, utilizing four various feature extraction techniques to optimize performance within the stacking ensemble learning framework. Combining five machine learning algorithms,Decision Trees, Random Forest, Linear Support Vector Classification, Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors into an ensemble method, we achieved superior results compared to traditional machine learning classifier models. The stacking classifier achieved a high accuracy rate of 94.00%, outperforming traditional machine learning models and surpassing the results of prior experiments that utilized the same dataset. The outcomes of our experiments showcased an accuracy rate of 0.94% in detection tweets as aggressive or non-aggressive.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.