Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Emulating the interstellar medium chemistry with neural operators (2402.12435v1)

Published 19 Feb 2024 in astro-ph.GA and cs.LG

Abstract: Galaxy formation and evolution critically depend on understanding the complex photo-chemical processes that govern the evolution and thermodynamics of the InterStellar Medium (ISM). Computationally, solving chemistry is among the most heavy tasks in cosmological and astrophysical simulations. The evolution of such non-equilibrium photo-chemical network relies on implicit, precise, computationally costly, ordinary differential equations (ODE) solvers. Here, we aim at substituting such procedural solvers with fast, pre-trained, emulators based on neural operators. We emulate a non-equilibrium chemical network up to H$_2$ formation (9 species, 52 reactions) by adopting the DeepONet formalism, i.e. by splitting the ODE solver operator that maps the initial conditions and time evolution into a tensor product of two neural networks. We use $\texttt{KROME}$ to generate a training set spanning $-2\leq \log(n/\mathrm{cm}{-3}) \leq 3.5$, $\log(20) \leq\log(T/\mathrm{K}) \leq 5.5$, $-6 \leq \log(n_i/n) < 0$, and by adopting an incident radiation field $\textbf{F}$ sampled in 10 energy bins with a continuity prior. We separately train the solver for $T$ and each $n_i$ for $\simeq 4.34\,\rm GPUhrs$. Compared with the reference solutions obtained by $\texttt{KROME}$ for single zone models, the typical precision obtained is of order $10{-2}$, i.e. the $10 \times$ better with a training that is $40 \times$ less costly with respect to previous emulators which however considered only a fixed $\mathbf{F}$. The present model achieves a speed-up of a factor of $128 \times$ with respect to stiff ODE solvers. Our neural emulator represents a significant leap forward in the modeling of ISM chemistry, offering a good balance of precision, versatility, and computational efficiency.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: