Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A robustness-enhanced reconstruction based on discontinuity feedback factor for high-order finite volume scheme (2402.10914v1)

Published 19 Jan 2024 in math.NA, cs.NA, and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: In this paper, a robustness-enhanced reconstruction for the high-order finite volume scheme is constructed on the 2-D structured mesh, and both the high-order gas-kinetic scheme(GKS) and the Lax-Friedrichs(L-F) flux solver are considered to verify the validity of this algorithm. The strategy of the successful WENO reconstruction is adopted to select the smooth sub-stencils. However, there are cases where strong discontinuities exist in all sub-stencils of the WENO reconstruction, which leads to a decrease in the robustness. To improve the robustness of the algorithm in discontinuous regions in two-dimensional space, the hybrid reconstruction based on a combination of discontinuity feedback factor(DF) \cite{ji2021gradient} and WENO reconstruction is developed to deal with the possible discontinuities. Numerical results from smooth to extreme cases have been presented and validate that the new finite volume scheme is effective for robustness enhancement and maintains high resolution compared to the WENO scheme.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Journal of Computational Physics 326, 780–804 (2016)
  2. Physical review 94(3), 511 (1954)
  3. Journal of computational physics 227(6), 3191–3211 (2008)
  4. Cambridge university press (1990)
  5. Journal of computational Physics 230(10), 4028–4050 (2011)
  6. Mathematics of computation 52(186), 411–435 (1989)
  7. Journal of computational physics 141(2), 199–224 (1998)
  8. Journal of Computational Physics 230(10), 3727–3752 (2011)
  9. Journal of Computational Physics 305, 333–359 (2016)
  10. Journal of Computational Physics 374, 724–751 (2018)
  11. Journal of Scientific Computing 73, 736–752 (2017)
  12. Gottlieb, S.: On high order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multi step time discretizations. Journal of scientific computing 25, 105–128 (2005)
  13. Harten, A.: High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of computational physics 135(2), 260–278 (1997)
  14. Springer (1997)
  15. Journal of Computational Physics 207(2), 542–567 (2005)
  16. Ji, X.: High-order non-compact and compact gas-kinetic schemes. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Hong Kong) (2019)
  17. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 35(7), 485–509 (2021)
  18. Journal of Computational Physics 356, 150–173 (2018)
  19. Journal of Computational Physics 410, 109367 (2020)
  20. Journal of computational physics 126(1), 202–228 (1996)
  21. AIAA journal 50(6), 1415–1426 (2012)
  22. Kolgan, V.: Application of the principle of minimum values of the derivative to the construction of finite-difference schemes for calculating discontinuous gasdynamics solutions. TsAGI, Uchenye Zapiski 3(6), 68–77 (1972)
  23. Tech. rep., Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) (1958)
  24. Siam Journal on Scientific Computing 19(2), 319–340 (1998)
  25. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 38(5), A3046–A3069 (2016)
  26. Journal of Computational Physics p. 112318 (2023)
  27. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 25(3), 995–1017 (2003)
  28. Journal of computational physics 115(1), 200–212 (1994)
  29. Journal of Scientific Computing 54, 603–621 (2013)
  30. Journal of Computational Physics 228(23), 8693–8711 (2009)
  31. Journal of Computational Physics 318, 327–348 (2016)
  32. Journal of Computational Physics 326, 197–221 (2016)
  33. Journal of computational physics 77(2), 439–471 (1988)
  34. Journal of Computational Physics 83(1), 32–78 (1989)
  35. Toro, E.F.: Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction. Springer Science & Business Media (2013)
  36. In: Upwind and high-resolution schemes, pp. 95–103. Springer (1997)
  37. Van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of computational Physics 32(1), 101–136 (1979)
  38. Van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. Journal of computational physics 135(2), 229–248 (1997)
  39. Xu, K.: Gas-kinetic schemes for unsteady compressible flow simulations. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Annual Lecture Series, 29 th, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium (1998)
  40. Xu, K.: A gas-kinetic BGK scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations and its connection with artificial dissipation and Godunov method. Journal of Computational Physics 171(1), 289–335 (2001)
  41. World Scientific (2014)
  42. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computational Fluid Engineers pp. 312–313 (2022)
  43. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 3(1), 117–133 (1996)
  44. Journal of Computational Physics 477, 111921 (2023)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: