Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Vectorial Negabent Concepts: Similarities, Differences, and Generalizations (2402.05677v1)

Published 8 Feb 2024 in math.CO, cs.DM, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: In Pasalic et al., IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 69 (2023), 2702--2712, and in Anbar, Meidl, Cryptogr. Commun. 10 (2018), 235--249, two different vectorial negabent and vectorial bent-negabent concepts are introduced, which leads to seemingly contradictory results. One of the main motivations for this article is to clarify the differences and similarities between these two concepts. Moreover, the negabent concept is extended to generalized Boolean functions from (\mathbb{F}2n) to the cyclic group (\mathbb{Z}{2k}). It is shown how to obtain nega-(\mathbb{Z}{2k})-bent functions from (\mathbb{Z}{2k})-bent functions, or equivalently, corresponding non-splitting relative difference sets from the splitting relative difference sets. This generalizes the shifting results for Boolean bent and negabent functions. We finally point to constructions of (\mathbb{Z}8)-bent functions employing permutations with the ((\mathcal{A}_m)) property, and more generally we show that the inverse permutation gives rise to (\mathbb{Z}{2k})-bent functions.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.