Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Simulation of Graph Algorithms with Looped Transformers (2402.01107v3)

Published 2 Feb 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.DS

Abstract: The execution of graph algorithms using neural networks has recently attracted significant interest due to promising empirical progress. This motivates further understanding of how neural networks can replicate reasoning steps with relational data. In this work, we study the ability of transformer networks to simulate algorithms on graphs from a theoretical perspective. The architecture we use is a looped transformer with extra attention heads that interact with the graph. We prove by construction that this architecture can simulate individual algorithms such as Dijkstra's shortest path, Breadth- and Depth-First Search, and Kosaraju's strongly connected components, as well as multiple algorithms simultaneously. The number of parameters in the networks does not increase with the input graph size, which implies that the networks can simulate the above algorithms for any graph. Despite this property, we show a limit to simulation in our solution due to finite precision. Finally, we show a Turing Completeness result with constant width when the extra attention heads are utilized.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974.
  2. What learning algorithm is in-context learning? investigations with linear models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15661, 2022.
  3. Neural algorithmic reasoning with causal regularisation. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023.
  4. Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(130):1–61, 2023.
  5. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press, 2022.
  6. Scaling vision transformers to 22 billion parameters. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7480–7512, 2023.
  7. Relational attention: Generalizing transformers for graph-structured tasks. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  8. Edsger W Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math., 1959. doi: 10.1007/BF01386390.
  9. Graph neural networks are dynamic programmers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:20635–20647, 2022.
  10. Parallel algorithms align with neural execution. In The Second Learning on Graphs Conference, 2023.
  11. Learning transformer programs. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  12. Beyond erdos-renyi: Generalization in algorithmic reasoning on graphs. In NeurIPS 2023 Workshop: I Can’t Believe It’s Not Better Workshop: Failure Modes in the Age of Foundation Models, 2023a.
  13. Neural algorithmic reasoning for combinatorial optimisation. In The Second Learning on Graphs Conference, 2023b.
  14. Looped transformers as programmable computers. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202, pages 11398–11442, 2023.
  15. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401, 2014.
  16. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature, 538(7626):471–476, 2016.
  17. A generalist neural algorithmic learner. In Learning on Graphs Conference, pages 2–1, 2022.
  18. Neural gpus learn algorithms. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
  19. Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(10s):1–41, 2022.
  20. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  21. Teaching arithmetic to small transformers. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  22. Tracr: Compiled transformers as a laboratory for interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05062, 2023.
  23. Transformers learn shortcuts to automata. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  24. Andreas Loukas. What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs width. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  25. Urisc: the ultimate reduced instruction set computer. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 25(4):327–334, 1988.
  26. Edward F. Moore. The Shortest Path Through a Maze. Bell Telephone System. Technical publications. monograph. Bell Telephone System., 1959.
  27. Dual algorithmic reasoning. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  28. Attention is turing-complete. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(75):1–35, 2021.
  29. Neural programmer-interpreters. In The Fourth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
  30. Neural algorithmic reasoning without intermediate supervision. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  31. On the computational power of neural nets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 50:132–150, 1995.
  32. Towards scale-invariant graph-related problem solving by iterative homogeneous GNNs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:15811–15822, 2020.
  33. Sparse sinkhorn attention. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9438–9447, 2020.
  34. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  35. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  36. Neural algorithmic reasoning. Patterns, 2(7), 2021.
  37. The CLRS algorithmic reasoning benchmark. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 22084–22102, 2022.
  38. Graph attention networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  39. Neural execution of graph algorithms. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  40. Statistically meaningful approximation: a case study on approximating turing machines with transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:12071–12083, 2022a.
  41. Emergent abilities of large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022b. ISSN 2835-8856.
  42. What can neural networks reason about? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  43. Neural execution engines: Learning to execute subroutines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:17298–17308, 2020.
  44. Incorporating convolution designs into visual transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 579–588, 2021.
Citations (10)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that looped transformers effectively simulate classical graph algorithms such as BFS, DFS, and Dijkstra’s using specialized attention mechanisms.
  • Methodologically, it decouples network width from graph size, ensuring scalability for varied graph inputs while addressing finite precision limitations.
  • The established Turing completeness of the architecture underscores its potential for adaptive, learning-based models in algorithmic reasoning.

Simulation of Graph Algorithms with Looped Transformers

The paper "Simulation of Graph Algorithms with Looped Transformers" by Artur Back de Luca and Kimon Fountoulakis examines the capability of transformer networks to simulate graph algorithms from a theoretical standpoint. This paper leverages a looped transformer architecture with additional attention heads specifically designed to interact with graph structures, providing both a theoretical foundation and concrete proofs for such simulations.

Key Contributions

The paper makes several significant contributions to the field:

  1. Theoretical Simulation of Graph Algorithms: The authors prove that a looped transformer architecture can simulate traditional graph algorithms, such as Breadth-First Search (BFS), Depth-First Search (DFS), Dijkstra’s Shortest Path algorithm, and Kosaraju’s algorithm for identifying strongly connected components.
  2. Network Width and Graph Size Decoupling: The results highlight an essential feature: the width of the network does not scale with the size of the input graph. This decoupling implies that the architecture can simulate these algorithms for graphs of varying sizes without increasing the number of network parameters.
  3. Finite Precision Constraints: Despite the flexibility regarding graph size, the authors acknowledge inherent limitations due to finite precision in the simulated algorithms. They emphasize that while looped transformers can execute long processes on graphs, precise simulation is bound by the precision limits of the underlying computations.
  4. Turing Completeness: The paper establishes that the presented looped transformer architecture with a constant width, integrating extra attention heads for graph interaction, is Turing Complete. This means the model can, in principle, simulate any computable function given enough resources.

Theoretical Framework and Proofs

The authors construct their theoretical results by establishing:

  • Simulation Definitions: Using formal definitions, they outline the concept of simulation in the context of steps of algorithms and how these can be faithfully reproduced by neural networks.
  • Structural Definitions: They introduce definitions for the adjacency matrix (AA), input matrix (XX), and their padded versions (A~\tilde{A}) when nodes are represented by positional encodings.
  • Attention Mechanisms: A modified attention head is introduced to enable interaction with the graph’s adjacency matrix, facilitating the direct execution of graph-specific operations without scaling parameters with the graph size.

Implementation of Algorithm Simulation

The paper meticulously details the implementation of several core graph algorithms:

  • Breadth- and Depth-First Search: Using priority values that mimic queue and stack behaviors, the BFS and DFS algorithms are implemented with detailed steps for initializing variables, masking visited nodes, and updating graph traversal priorities.
  • Dijkstra’s Algorithm: The simulation includes precisely defined operations for distance updates, neighbor comparisons, and path updates, ensuring correct calculation of shortest paths under the constraints of finite precision.
  • Kosaraju’s Algorithm: The paper presents a more complex implementation due to the dual-phase nature of Kosaraju’s SCC algorithm, requiring additional attention heads and steps to manage the traversal of both the graph and its transposed version.

Practical Implications and Future Work

The implications of this work are twofold:

  • Practical Applications: The methods presented can be applied to build efficient neural networks for algorithmic reasoning on graphs. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where traditional algorithmic approaches are computationally intensive and require adaptive learning-based models.
  • Theoretical Significance: Establishing Turing Completeness using looped transformers with graph-specific attention heads contributes to a deeper understanding of the theoretical capabilities and limitations of neural networks in algorithmic reasoning.

Speculations on Future Developments

Future research directions could include:

  • Unified Network for Multiple Algorithms: While this paper demonstrates simulating various graph algorithms using different parameter settings within the same architecture, a single generalist model capable of adaptively executing multiple algorithms could be a valuable advancement.
  • PAC Learning Framework: Investigating these looped transformers within the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning framework could provide insights into sample complexity and the learnability of algorithmic tasks, especially considering the limitations posed by finite precision.

This paper presents a rigorous and comprehensive approach to understanding and proving the capability of looped transformers in simulating graph algorithms, marking a significant step forward in the intersection of deep learning and algorithmic graph theory.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown