Emergent Mind

Randomized query composition and product distributions

(2401.15352)
Published Jan 27, 2024 in cs.CC and cs.DS

Abstract

Let Reps denote randomized query complexity for error probability eps, and R:=R{1/3}. In this work we investigate whether a perfect composition theorem R(f o gn)=Omega(R(f).R(g)) holds for a relation f in {0,1}n * S and a total inner function g:{0,1}m \to {0, 1}. Let Dprod denote the maximum distributional query complexity with respect to any product (over variables) distribution. In this work we show the composition theorem R(f o gn)=Omega(R(f).D{prod}(g)) up to logarithmic factors. In light of the minimax theorem which states that R(g) is the maximum distributional complexity of g over any distribution, our result makes progress towards answering the composition question. We prove our result by means of a complexity measure Rprod(eps) that we define for total Boolean functions. We show it to be equivalent (up to logarithmic factors) to the sabotage complexity measure RS() defined by Ben-David and Kothari (ICALP 2019): RS(g) = Theta(Rprod(1/3)(g)) (up to log factors). We ask if our bound RS(g) = Omega(Dprod(g)) (up to log factors) is tight. We answer this question in the negative, by showing that for the NAND tree function, sabotage complexity is polynomially larger than Dprod. Our proof yields an alternative and different derivation of the tight lower bound on the bounded error randomized query complexity of the NAND tree function (originally proved by Santha in 1985), which may be of independent interest. Our result gives an explicit polynomial separation between R and Dprod which, to our knowledge, was not known prior to our work.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.