Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mapping the Field of Algorithm Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Trends, Linguistic and Geographical Disparities (2401.11194v1)

Published 20 Jan 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: The increasing reliance on complex algorithmic systems by online platforms has sparked a growing need for algorithm auditing, a research methodology evaluating these systems' functionality and societal impact. In this paper, we systematically review algorithm auditing studies and identify trends in their methodological approaches, the geographic distribution of authors, and the selection of platforms, languages, geographies, and group-based attributes in the focus of auditing research. We present evidence of a significant skew of research focus toward Western contexts, particularly the US, and a disproportionate reliance on English language data. Additionally, our analysis indicates a tendency in algorithm auditing studies to focus on a narrow set of group-based attributes, often operationalized in simplified ways, which might obscure more nuanced aspects of algorithmic bias and discrimination. By conducting this review, we aim to provide a clearer understanding of the current state of the algorithm auditing field and identify gaps that need to be addressed for a more inclusive and representative research landscape.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (152)
  1. Examining algorithmic biases in YouTube’s recommendations of vaccine videos. International Journal of Medical Informatics 140 (Aug. 2020), 104175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104175
  2. Deradicalizing YouTube: Characterization, Detection, and Personalization of Religiously Intolerant Arabic Videos. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555618
  3. Ad Delivery Algorithms: The Hidden Arbiters of Political Messaging. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, Virtual Event Israel, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437963.3441801
  4. Arjun Appadurai. 2016. The Academic Digital Divide and Uneven Global Development. (April 2016).
  5. Identifying Stereotypes in the Online Perception of Physical Attractiveness. In Social Informatics, Emma Spiro and Yong-Yeol Ahn (Eds.). Vol. 10046. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_26 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  6. Jeffrey J. Arnett. 2008. The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist 63, 7 (Oct. 2008), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
  7. Auditing Race and Gender Discrimination in Online Housing Markets. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 14 (May 2020), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7276
  8. Jack Bandy. 2021. Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 74:1–74:34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449148
  9. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2020. Auditing News Curation Systems: A Case Study Examining Algorithmic and Editorial Logic in Apple News. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 14 (May 2020), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7277
  10. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021a. Curating Quality? How Twitter’s Timeline Algorithm Treats Different Types of News. Social Media + Society 7, 3 (July 2021), 205630512110416. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211041648
  11. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021b. More Accounts, Fewer Links: How Algorithmic Curation Impacts Media Exposure in Twitter Timelines. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449152
  12. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2023. Facebook’s News Feed Algorithm and the 2020 US Election. Social Media + Society 9, 3 (July 2023), 20563051231196898. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196898
  13. Jack Bandy and Brent Hecht. 2021. Errors in Geotargeted Display Advertising: Good News for Local Journalism? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449166
  14. Auditing Algorithmic Bias on Twitter. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021. ACM, Virtual Event United Kingdom, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462491
  15. Quantity vs. Quality: Evaluating User Interest Profiles Using Ad Preference Managers.. In NDSS. https://www.cbw.sh/static/pdf/bashir-2019-ndss.pdf
  16. Rafael Becerril-Arreola. 2023. A Method to Assess and Explain Disparate Impact in Online Retailing. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. ACM, Austin TX USA, 3670–3679. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583270
  17. Anja Bechmann and Kristoffer L. Nielbo. 2018. Are We Exposed to the Same “News” in the News Feed?: An empirical analysis of filter bubbles as information similarity for Danish Facebook users. Digital Journalism 6, 8 (Sept. 2018), 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741
  18. Designing Reflective Derived Metrics for Fitness Trackers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (Jan. 2023), 158:1–158:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569475
  19. Maximilian Boeker and Aleksandra Urman. 2022. An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. ACM, Virtual Event, Lyon France, 2298–2309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512102
  20. An investigation of biases in web search engine query suggestions. Online Information Review 44, 2 (Dec. 2019), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2018-0341
  21. Foundations for fairness in digital health apps. Frontiers in Digital Health 4 (Aug. 2022), 943514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.943514
  22. Unveiling and Quantifying Facebook Exploitation of Sensitive Personal Data for Advertising Purposes. 479–495. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity18/presentation/cabanas
  23. Lorena Cano-Orón. 2019. Dr. Google, what can you tell me about homeopathy? Comparative study of the top10 websites in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Mexico and Spain. El Profesional de la Información 28, 2 (March 2019). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.13
  24. Abhijnan Chakraborty and Niloy Ganguly. 2018. Analyzing the News Coverage of Personalized Newspapers. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, Barcelona, 540–543. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508812
  25. Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174225
  26. An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Montréal Québec Canada, 1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883089
  27. Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533213
  28. Challenging Google Search filter bubbles in social and political information: Disconforming evidence from a digital methods case study. Telematics and Informatics 35, 7 (Oct. 2018), 2006–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.004
  29. “Is COVID-19 a hoax?”: auditing the quality of COVID-19 conspiracy-related information and misinformation in Google search results in four languages. Internet Research 33, 5 (Nov. 2023), 1774–1801. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2022-0560
  30. Henry Kudzanai Dambanemuya and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. Auditing the Information Quality of News-Related Queries on the Alexa Voice Assistant. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449157
  31. When the Umpire is also a Player: Bias in Private Label Product Recommendations on E-commerce Marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445944
  32. Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination. (2015).
  33. Anastasia Denisova and Aliaksandr Herasimenka. 2019. How Russian Rap on YouTube Advances Alternative Political Deliberation: Hegemony, Counter-Hegemony, and Emerging Resistant Publics. Social Media + Society 5, 2 (April 2019), 2056305119835200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119835200 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  34. Paying Attention to the Algorithm Behind the Curtain: Bringing Transparency to YouTube’s Demonetization Algorithms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555209
  35. Maria C. Eriksson and Anna Johansson. 2017. Tracking Gendered Streams. Culture Unbound 9, 2 (Oct. 2017), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1792163
  36. “Be Careful; Things Can Be Worse than They Appear”: Understanding Biased Algorithms and Users’ Behavior Around Them in Rating Platforms. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 11, 1 (May 2017), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14898 Number: 1.
  37. Ethnologue. 2023. What are the top 200 most spoken languages? https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/ethnologue200/
  38. Google News and Machine Gatekeepers: Algorithmic Personalisation and News Diversity in Online News Search. Digital Journalism 11, 9 (Oct. 2023), 1682–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2055596
  39. Algorithmic Audit of Italian Car Insurance: Evidence of Unfairness in Access and Pricing. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462569
  40. A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube’s Promotion of Conspiracy Videos. ArXiv (March 2020). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Longitudinal-Analysis-of-YouTube%27s-Promotion-of-Faddoul-Chaslot/e9b8266ec5d94660dde5f89b4e01586dcddf2515
  41. Anna Farkas and Renáta Németh. 2022. How to measure gender bias in machine translation: Real-world oriented machine translators, multiple reference points. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 5, 1 (2022), 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100239
  42. Auditing local news presence on Google News. Nature Human Behaviour 4, 12 (Sept. 2020), 1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00954-0
  43. A little bird told me your gender: Gender inferences in social media. Information Processing & Management 58, 3 (May 2021), 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102541
  44. Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, Anchorage AK USA, 2221–2231. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330691
  45. Evaluation metrics for measuring bias in search engine results. Information Retrieval Journal 24, 2 (April 2021), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-020-09386-w
  46. Tim Glaesener. 2022. Exploring Siri’s Content Diversity Using a Crowdsourced Audit. Journal of Digital Social Research 4, 1 (April 2022), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i1.115 Number: 1.
  47. Fabian Haak and Philipp Schaer. 2022. Auditing Search Query Suggestion Bias Through Recursive Algorithm Interrogation. In 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501247.3531567
  48. Nick Hagar and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2023. Algorithmic indifference: The dearth of news recommendations on TikTok. New Media & Society (Aug. 2023), 14614448231192964. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231192964
  49. Burst of the Filter Bubble?: Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism 6, 3 (March 2018), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
  50. Measuring personalization of web search. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Rio de Janeiro Brazil, 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488435
  51. Measuring Price Discrimination and Steering on E-commerce Web Sites. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663744
  52. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 1914–1933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998327
  53. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 7302 (July 2010), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a Number: 7302 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  54. Auditing the Biases Enacted by YouTube for Political Topics in Germany. In Mensch und Computer 2021. ACM, Ingolstadt Germany, 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473864
  55. Auditing the Partisanship of Google Search Snippets. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, San Francisco CA USA, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313654
  56. An Empirical Study on Online Price Differentiation. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. ACM, Tempe AZ USA, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176258.3176338
  57. Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392854
  58. Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 1 (Jan. 2022), e2025334119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025334119
  59. ‘I’m not bad, I’m just … drawn that way’: media and algorithmic systems logics in the Italian Google Images construction of (cr)immigrants’ communities. Information, Communication & Society (April 2023), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2205928
  60. Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. ACM, Ljubljana Slovenia, 3767–3778. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450077
  61. Left or Right: A Peek into the Political Biases in Email Spam Filtering Algorithms During US Election 2020. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. ACM, Virtual Event, Lyon France, 2491–2500. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512121
  62. Assessing enactment of content regulation policies: A post hoc crowd-sourced audit of election misinformation on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580846
  63. Prerna Juneja and Tanushree Mitra. 2021. Auditing E-Commerce Platforms for Algorithmically Curated Vaccine Misinformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445250
  64. Jonas Kaiser and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2020. Birds of a Feather Get Recommended Together: Algorithmic Homophily in YouTube’s Channel Recommendations in the United States and Germany. Social Media + Society 6, 4 (Oct. 2020), 205630512096991. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969914
  65. Your Browsing History May Cost You: A Framework for Discovering Differential Pricing in Non-Transparent Markets. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Chicago IL USA, 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594038
  66. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 3819–3828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520
  67. Location, Location, Location: The Impact of Geolocation on Web Search Personalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, Tokyo Japan, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815714
  68. Lydia Kollyri. 2021. De-coding Instagram as a Spectacle. Mediální studia 15, 02 (2021), 103–124. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1006361 Publisher: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fakulta sociálních věd.
  69. Different platforms, different plots? The Kremlin-controlled search engine Yandex as a resource for Russia’s informational influence in Belarus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism 24, 12 (Dec. 2023), 2762–2780. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231157845
  70. Daria Kravets and F. Toepfl. 2022. Gauging reference and source bias over time: how Russia’s partially state-controlled search engine Yandex mediated an anti-regime protest event. Information, Communication & Society 25, 15 (Nov. 2022), 2207–2223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933563
  71. Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998321
  72. Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search. Information Retrieval Journal 22, 1-2 (April 2019), 188–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2
  73. Ying-ho Kwong. 2023. Online counter-mobilisation via social media: Exploration of pro-regime opinion leaders in Hong Kong under Chinese sovereignty. Asia Pacific Viewpoint n/a, n/a (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12398 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/apv.12398.
  74. Cameron Lai and Markus Luczak-Roesch. 2019. You Can’t See What You Can’t See: Experimental Evidence for How Much Relevant Information May Be Missed Due to Google’s Web Search Personalisation. In Social Informatics, Ingmar Weber, Kareem M. Darwish, Claudia Wagner, Emilio Zagheni, Laura Nelson, Samin Aref, and Fabian Flöck (Eds.). Vol. 11864. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_17 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  75. Anja Lambrecht and Catherine Tucker. 2019. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. Management Science 65, 7 (July 2019), 2966–2981. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093
  76. A Crowdsourcing Methodology to Measure Algorithmic Bias in Black-Box Systems: A Case Study with COVID-Related Searches. In Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval, Ludovico Boratto, Stefano Faralli, Mirko Marras, and Giovanni Stilo (Eds.). Vol. 1610. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09316-6_5 Series Title: Communications in Computer and Information Science.
  77. Modeling rabbit-holes on YouTube. Social Network Analysis and Mining 13, 1 (Aug. 2023), 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01105-9
  78. Radical bubbles on YouTube? Revisiting algorithmic extremism with personalised recommendations. First Monday (Dec. 2022). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i12.12552
  79. Alina Leidinger and Richard Rogers. 2023. Which Stereotypes Are Moderated and Under-Moderated in Search Engine Autocompletion?. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Chicago IL USA, 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594062
  80. Becca Lewis. 2018. Alternative Influence. https://datasociety.net/library/alternative-influence/ Publisher: Data & Society Research Institute.
  81. How WEIRD is CHI?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445488
  82. Lisa Zieringer and Diana Rieger. 2023. Algorithmic Recommendations’ Role for the Interrelatedness of Counter-Messages and Polluted Content on YouTube – A Network Analysis. Computational Communication Research 5, 1 (Jan. 2023), 109. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.005.ZIER
  83. Anna Litvinenko. 2021. YouTube as Alternative Television in Russia: Political Videos During the Presidential Election Campaign 2018. Social Media + Society 7, 1 (Jan. 2021), 2056305120984455. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984455 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  84. Emma Lurie and Eni Mustafaraj. [n. d.]. Opening Up the Black Box: Auditing Google’s Top Stories Algorithm. ([n. d.]).
  85. Examining Political Bias within YouTube Search and Recommendation Algorithms. In 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660012
  86. Enthusiasts, Pragmatists, and Skeptics: Investigating Users’ Attitudes Towards Emotion- and Personality-Aware Voice Assistants across Cultures. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022 (MuC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3543776
  87. Mark MacCarthy. 2020. Transparency Requirements for Digital Social Media Platforms: Recommendations for Policy Makers and Industry. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3615726
  88. Memory, counter-memory and denialism: How search engines circulate information about the Holodomor-related memory wars. Memory Studies 15, 6 (Dec. 2022), 1330–1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221133732
  89. A story of (non)compliance, bias, and conspiracies: How Google and Yandex represented Smart Voting during the 2021 parliamentary elections in Russia. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (March 2022). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-94
  90. J. Nathan Matias. 2023. Influencing recommendation algorithms to reduce the spread of unreliable news by encouraging humans to fact-check articles, in a field experiment. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (July 2023), 11715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38277-5
  91. The Substantial Interdependence of Wikipedia and Google: A Case Study on the Relationship Between Peer Production Communities and Information Technologies. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 11, 1 (May 2017), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14883
  92. An Image of Society: Gender and Racial Representation and Impact in Image Search Results for Occupations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449100
  93. Search Media and Elections: A Longitudinal Investigation of Political Search Results. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359231
  94. Auditing Algorithms: Understanding Algorithmic Systems from the Outside In. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 14, 4 (2021), 272–344. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000083
  95. Detecting price and search discrimination on the internet. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, Redmond Washington, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390231.2390245
  96. Crowd-assisted search for price discrimination in e-commerce: first results. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies. ACM, Santa Barbara California USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535372.2535415
  97. Hallvard Moe. 2019. Comparing Platform “Ranking Cultures” Across Languages: The Case of Islam on YouTube in Scandinavia. Social Media + Society 5, 1 (Jan. 2019), 205630511881703. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118817038
  98. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151, 4 (Aug. 2009), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 Publisher: American College of Physicians.
  99. Dhiraj Murthy. 2021. Evaluating Platform Accountability: Terrorist Content on YouTube. American Behavioral Scientist 65, 6 (May 2021), 800–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989774
  100. The case for voter-centered audits of search engines during political elections. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372835
  101. Roger Mähler and Patrick Vonderau. 2017. Studying Ad Targeting with Digital Methods: The Case of Spotify. Culture Unbound 9, 2 (Oct. 2017), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1792212
  102. Efrat Nechushtai and Seth C. Lewis. 2019. What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior 90 (Jan. 2019), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043
  103. More of the Same? Homogenization in News Recommendations When Users Search on Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Mass Communication and Society (March 2023), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2173609
  104. Exploring YouTube’s Recommendation System in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccines: Computational and Comparative Analysis of Video Trajectories. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 (Sept. 2023), e49061. https://doi.org/10.2196/49061
  105. Safiya Noble. 2013. Google Search: Hyper-visibility as a Means of Rendering Black Women and Girls Invisible. (Oct. 2013). https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=27584
  106. Multilingual Analysis of YouTube’s Recommendation System: Examining Topic and Emotion Drift in the ‘Cheng Ho’ Narrative. ([n. d.]).
  107. “I’m fully who I am”: Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Chicago IL USA, 1246–1266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594078
  108. Orestis Papakyriakopoulos and Arwa M. Mboya. 2023. Beyond Algorithmic Bias: A Socio-Computational Interrogation of the Google Search by Image Algorithm. Social Science Computer Review 41, 4 (Aug. 2023), 1100–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211073169
  109. Gleb Papyshev and Masaru Yarime. 2022. The limitation of ethics-based approaches to regulating artificial intelligence: regulatory gifting in the context of Russia. AI & SOCIETY (Dec. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01611-y
  110. Assessing Trustworthiness of Internet Pharmacies with an Internet Browser Extension. The Journal of Medicine Access 7 (Jan. 2023), 27550834231191895. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834231191895
  111. Marie-Therese Png. 2022. At the Tensions of South and North: Critical Roles of Global South Stakeholders in AI Governance. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533200
  112. Cornelius Puschmann. 2019. Beyond the Bubble: Assessing the Diversity of Political Search Results. Digital Journalism 7, 6 (July 2019), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626
  113. Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. 2019. Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314244
  114. Data Donations for Mapping Risk in Google Search of Health Queries: A case study of unproven stem cell treatments in SEM. In 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2985–2992. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308420
  115. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372879
  116. From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24, 1 (Feb. 2018), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982
  117. Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417
  118. Auditing Autocomplete: Suggestion Networks and Recursive Algorithm Interrogation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, Boston Massachusetts USA, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326047
  119. Auditing the Personalization and Composition of Politically-Related Search Engine Results Pages. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’18. ACM Press, Lyon, France, 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186143
  120. Shaping information and knowledge on climate change technologies: A cross‐country qualitative analysis of carbon capture and storage results on Google search. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Sept. 2023), asi.24828. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24828
  121. Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445896
  122. Auditing Algorithms: Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms. (2014).
  123. YTTREX: Crowdsourced Analysis of YouTube’s Recommender System During COVID-19 Pandemic. In Information Management and Big Data, Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura, Jorge Carlos Valverde-Rebaza, Eduardo Díaz, and Hugo Alatrista-Salas (Eds.). Vol. 1410. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76228-5_8 Series Title: Communications in Computer and Information Science.
  124. Accounting for Personalization in Personalization Algorithms: YouTube’s Treatment of Conspiracy Content. Digital Journalism (May 2023), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2209153
  125. WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3593985
  126. Jieun Shin and Thomas Valente. 2020. Algorithms and Health Misinformation: A Case Study of Vaccine Books on Amazon. Journal of Health Communication 25, 5 (May 2020), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1776423
  127. Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebook. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. ACM, Taipei Taiwan, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380109
  128. Does the Bubble Go Beyond? (2019).
  129. Pelle Snickars. 2017. More of the Same – On Spotify Radio. Culture Unbound 9, 2 (Oct. 2017), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1792184
  130. MapWatch: Detecting and Monitoring International Border Personalization on Online Maps. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Montréal Québec Canada, 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883016
  131. Modeling and Validating a News Recommender Algorithm in a Mainstream Medium-Sized News Organization: An Experimental Approach. Future Internet 14, 10 (Sept. 2022), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14100284
  132. Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery: Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertising. Queue 11, 3 (March 2013), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460276.2460278
  133. Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society 24, 2 (Jan. 2021), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934
  134. Who are the plotters behind the pandemic? Comparing Covid-19 conspiracy theories in Google search results across five key target countries of Russia’s foreign communication. Information, Communication & Society 26, 10 (July 2023), 2033–2051. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2065213
  135. An Audit of Misinformation Filter Bubbles on YouTube: Bubble Bursting and Recent Behavior Changes. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, Amsterdam Netherlands, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3474241
  136. Daniel Trielli and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2019. Search as News Curator: The Role of Google in Shaping Attention to News Information. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300683
  137. The Accuracy of the Demographic Inferences Shown on Google’s Ad Settings. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. ACM, Toronto Canada, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267323.3268962
  138. Novelty in News Search: A Longitudinal Study of the 2020 US Elections. Social Science Computer Review (Aug. 2023), 08944393231195471. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231195471
  139. Julian Unkel and Mario Haim. 2021. Googling Politics: Parties, Sources, and Issue Ownerships on Google in the 2017 German Federal Election Campaign. Social Science Computer Review 39, 5 (Oct. 2021), 844–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319881634
  140. Aleksandra Urman and Mykola Makhortykh. 2022. “Foreign beauties want to meet you”: The sexualization of women in Google’s organic and sponsored text search results. New Media & Society (June 2022), 146144482210995. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099536
  141. Auditing Source Diversity Bias in Video Search Results Using Virtual Agents. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. ACM, Ljubljana Slovenia, 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3452306
  142. Auditing the representation of migrants in image web search results. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9, 1 (April 2022), 130. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01144-1
  143. The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines. Social Science Computer Review 40, 5 (Oct. 2022), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211006863
  144. Where the earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results. Telematics and Informatics 72 (Aug. 2022), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101860
  145. The right to audit and power asymmetries in algorithm auditing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.08301 arXiv:2302.08301 [cs].
  146. Gendered language and employment Web sites: How search algorithms can cause allocative harm. First Monday (July 2021). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i8.11717
  147. Auditing Offline Data Brokers via Facebook’s Advertising Platform. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, San Francisco CA USA, 1920–1930. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313666
  148. Measuring the Importance of User-Generated Content to Search Engines. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 13 (July 2019), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3248
  149. W3Techs. 2023. Usage Statistics and Market Share of Content Languages for Websites, December 2023. https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_language
  150. Matthew S. Weber and Allie Kosterich. 2018. Coding the News: The role of computer code in filtering and distributing news. Digital Journalism 6, 3 (March 2018), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1366865
  151. Khensani Xivuri and Hossana Twinomurinzi. 2021. A Systematic Review of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms. In Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Denis Dennehy, Anastasia Griva, Nancy Pouloudi, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Ilias Pappas, and Matti Mäntymäki (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_24
  152. Bubbles bursting: Investigating and measuring the personalisation of social media searches. Telematics and Informatics 82 (Aug. 2023), 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101999
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Aleksandra Urman (20 papers)
  2. Mykola Makhortykh (27 papers)
  3. Aniko Hannak (14 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com