Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 159 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PPNet: A Two-Stage Neural Network for End-to-end Path Planning (2401.09819v2)

Published 18 Jan 2024 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: The classical path planners, such as sampling-based path planners, can provide probabilistic completeness guarantees in the sense that the probability that the planner fails to return a solution if one exists, decays to zero as the number of samples approaches infinity. However, finding a near-optimal feasible solution in a given period is challenging in many applications such as the autonomous vehicle. To achieve an end-to-end near-optimal path planner, we first divide the path planning problem into two subproblems, which are path space segmentation and waypoints generation in the given path's space. We further propose a two-stage neural network named Path Planning Network (PPNet) each stage solves one of the subproblems abovementioned. Moreover, we propose a novel efficient data generation method for path planning named EDaGe-PP. EDaGe-PP can generate data with continuous-curvature paths with analytical expression while satisfying the clearance requirement. The results show the total computation time of generating random 2D path planning data is less than 1/33 and the success rate of PPNet trained by the dataset that is generated by EDaGe-PP is about 2 times compared to other methods. We validate PPNet against state-of-the-art path planning methods. The results show that PPNet can find a near-optimal solution in 15.3ms, which is much shorter than the state-of-the-art path planners.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (6)
  1. S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011.
  2. J. D. Gammell, S. S. Srinivasa, and T. D. Barfoot, “Batch Informed Trees (BIT*): Sampling-based optimal planning via the heuristically guided search of implicit random geometric graphs,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015, pp. 3067–3074.
  3. L. Janson, E. Schmerling, A. Clark, and M. Pavone, “Fast Marching Tree: A fast marching sampling-based method for optimal motion planning in many dimensions,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 883–921, 2015.
  4. S. Koenig, M. Likhachev, and D. Furcy, “Lifelong Planning A*,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 155, no. 1-2, pp. 93–146, 2004. L. E. Kavraki, P. ˇSvestka, J.-C. Latombe, and M. H.
  5. J. Kuffner and S. LaValle, “RRT-Connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2, 2000, pp. 995–1001.
  6. MMSegmentation Contributors. MMSegmentation: Open-mmlab semantic segmentation toolbox and benchmark. https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmsegmentation, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets