Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

AI and Generative AI for Research Discovery and Summarization (2401.06795v2)

Published 8 Jan 2024 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: AI and generative AI tools, including chatbots like ChatGPT that rely on LLMs, have burst onto the scene this year, creating incredible opportunities to increase work productivity and improve our lives. Statisticians and data scientists have begun experiencing the benefits from the availability of these tools in numerous ways, such as the generation of programming code from text prompts to analyze data or fit statistical models. One area that these tools can make a substantial impact is in research discovery and summarization. Standalone tools and plugins to chatbots are being developed that allow researchers to more quickly find relevant literature than pre-2023 search tools. Furthermore, generative AI tools have improved to the point where they can summarize and extract the key points from research articles in succinct language. Finally, chatbots based on highly parameterized LLMs can be used to simulate abductive reasoning, which provides researchers the ability to make connections among related technical topics, which can also be used for research discovery. We review the developments in AI and generative AI for research discovery and summarization, and propose directions where these types of tools are likely to head in the future that may be of interest to statistician and data scientists.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. GPT-4 technical report. ArXiv, abs/2303.08774.
  2. Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2).
  3. A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023.
  4. Google scholar’s ranking algorithm: An introductory overview. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI’09), volume 1, pages 230–241. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil).
  5. Abductive commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05739.
  6. Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. Perspective: Large language models in applied mechanics. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 90(10):101008.
  8. Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv, abs/2005.14165.
  9. Tldr: Extreme summarization of scientific documents. ArXiv, abs/2004.15011.
  10. Chincha, D. (2023). Number of ChatGPT plugins. Accessed on December 25, 2023.
  11. Davis, E. (2023). Mathematics, word problems, common sense, and artificial intelligence. ArXiv, abs/2301.09723.
  12. Doherty, S. (2016). Translations: The impact of translation technologies on the process and product of translation. International Journal of Communication, 10:23.
  13. Gower, J. C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53(3-4):325–338.
  14. Learning to fake it: Limited responses and fabricated references provided by ChatGPT for medical questions. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(3):226–234.
  15. How close is ChatGPT to human experts? comparison corpus, evaluation, and detection. ArXiv, abs/2301.07597.
  16. On using monolingual corpora in neural machine translation. ArXiv, abs/1503.03535.
  17. Towards reasoning in large language models: A survey. ArXiv, abs/2212.10403.
  18. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12):1–38.
  19. Kung, J. (2023). Elicit. The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 44:15 – 18.
  20. Morris, M. R. (2023). Scientists’ perspectives on the potential for generative AI in their fields. ArXiv, abs/2304.01420.
  21. Scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning. bioRxiv.
  22. Pareschi, R. (2023). Abductive reasoning with the GPT-4 language model: Case studies from criminal investigation, medical practice, scientific research. Sistemi intelligenti, 35(2):435–444.
  23. Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. vol. v, Pragmatism and Pragmaticism.
  24. Lectures on Pragmatism. Meiner.
  25. Reasoning with language model prompting: A survey. ArXiv, abs/2212.09597.
  26. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. science, 290(5500):2323–2326.
  27. ScriptByAI (2023). The complete list of ChatGPT plugins in ChatGPT plugin store. Accessed on December 25, 2023.
  28. StackExchange (2013). Converting a distance matrix into euclidean vector. Accessed on December 25, 2023.
  29. Challenging big-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09261.
  30. Torgerson, W. S. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I. theory and method. Psychometrika, 17(4):401–419.
  31. The importance of being recurrent for modeling hierarchical structure. ArXiv, abs/1803.03585.
  32. Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07682.
  33. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824–24837.
  34. When A.I. chatbots hallucinate. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/business/ai-chatbots-hallucination.html. Accessed on January 3, 2024.
  35. A fast approximation to multidimensional scaling. In IEEE workshop on computation intensive methods for computer vision.
Citations (9)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates how AI tools, particularly LLMs, revolutionize research discovery and method identification.
  • It outlines advanced techniques like abductive reasoning and plugin integrations to enhance literature search and summarization.
  • It highlights challenges such as hallucinations and context limitations while proposing future AI advancements to improve research outcomes.

AI and Generative AI for Research Discovery and Summarization

The paper "AI and Generative AI for Research Discovery and Summarization" explores the applications of AI tools, particularly generative AI such as LLMs, in facilitating research discovery and summarization. The focus is on how these technologies can enhance productivity and foster new developments in statistics and data science. The paper outlines the evolution of these tools, their current capabilities, and the future directions for AI-driven research.

Introduction

The introduction of AI and generative AI tools in recent years has dramatically impacted the landscape of research, learning, and productivity. LLM-based chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus and Google's Bard have revolutionized the way quantitative researchers work, offering functionalities including code generation, statistical modeling, and visualization capabilities. These chatbots have extended beyond their original roles, integrating plugins and external tools to facilitate more nuanced inquiries and providing significant support for language translation.

Web Search to LLM Queries: Challenges and Hallucinations

Transitioning from traditional web searches to AI-driven queries presents new challenges, primarily the phenomenon of AI "hallucinations." Hallucinations occur when LLMs generate incorrect or fabricated information with high confidence, which can undermine the credibility of search results and retrieved data. This issue is prevalent in chatbots like ChatGPT, often leading to inaccuracies in reference lists and factual information (Figure 1). Improvements are underway to minimize hallucinations, including the development of advanced training methodologies and verification tools. Figure 1

Figure 1: Response of ChatGPT to the prompt "provide citations for five papers on multidimensional scaling from the last ten years."

Method Identification and Abductive Reasoning

Chatbots equipped with LLMs have shown potential in method identification through a process akin to abductive reasoning. This ability allows researchers to input details of a method or concept to determine if existing solutions are already available in the literature. The paper highlights examples where ChatGPT successfully identified appropriate methodologies based on provided prompts, illustrating its application in aiding research discovery and method determination.

Literature Discovery Tools

The paper evaluates various AI-powered tools for literature discovery, emphasizing standalone web applications and plugins. Tools like Semantic Scholar and Elicit leverage AI to enhance the search and summarization of scientific literature through LLMs. These applications not only facilitate traditional keyword searches but also offer innovative features such as article summaries and citation analysis, which are crucial for effective research synthesis and knowledge acquisition. Notably, Elicit demonstrates the integration of AI for streamlined literature reviews and prompt-based research synthesis (Figure 2). Figure 2

Figure 2: Results of query to Elicit.

Summarizing and Abstracting Research Manuscripts

AI technologies like ChatGPT are effective in summarizing and abstracting manuscripts but face challenges with technical content. Current limitations include handling document size due to context length restrictions and accurately capturing complex mathematical or statistical details. However, future advancements in LLM capacities, such as increased token limits in next-generation models (e.g., Google’s Gemini Pro 1.5), will likely overcome these barriers, facilitating more comprehensive and accurate document processing.

Future Directions and Conclusion

Looking ahead, the paper anticipates significant advancements in AI capabilities, extending the reach of research tools to include non-traditional formats like videos and podcasts. Moreover, expanding open-access resources and addressing copyright limitations are critical for AI's progression in research discovery. AI tools focused on literature synthesis, citation accuracy, and research trend prediction stand to redefine research methodologies and efficiencies.

In conclusion, the developments in AI and generative AI tools for research hold promising potential to transform the landscape of statistical sciences. By accelerating discovery and streamlining burdensome processes, these technologies are poised to allow researchers to focus on innovative endeavors, thus advancing scientific inquiry and productivity.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Authors (2)