Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Prediction of Cellular Identities from Trajectory and Cell Fate Information (2401.06182v2)

Published 11 Jan 2024 in q-bio.QM, cs.CV, cs.LG, and eess.IV

Abstract: Determining cell identities in imaging sequences is an important yet challenging task. The conventional method for cell identification is via cell tracking, which is complex and can be time-consuming. In this study, we propose an innovative approach to cell identification during early $\textit{C. elegans}$ embryogenesis using machine learning. Cell identification during $\textit{C. elegans}$ embryogenesis would provide insights into neural development with implications for higher organisms including humans. We employed random forest, MLP, and LSTM models, and tested cell classification accuracy on 3D time-lapse confocal datasets spanning the first 4 hours of embryogenesis. By leveraging a small number of spatial-temporal features of individual cells, including cell trajectory and cell fate information, our models achieve an accuracy of over 91%, even with limited data. We also determine the most important feature contributions and can interpret these features in the context of biological knowledge. Our research demonstrates the success of predicting cell identities in time-lapse imaging sequences directly from simple spatio-temporal features.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. “Automated cell lineage tracing in caenorhabditis elegans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2707–2712, 2006.
  2. “Spatially isotropic four-dimensional imaging with dual-view plane illumination microscopy,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1032–1038, 2013.
  3. “Structural and developmental principles of neuropil assembly in c. elegans,” Nature, vol. 591, no. 7848, pp. 99–104, 2021.
  4. “The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans,” Developmental biology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 64–119, 1983.
  5. “Acetree: a tool for visual analysis of caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2006.
  6. “The cell tracking challenge: 10 years of objective benchmarking,” Nature Methods, pp. 1–11, 2023.
  7. “Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 115, pp. 211–252, 2015.
  8. “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  9. “System-level quantification and phenotyping of early embryonic morphogenesis of caenorhabditis elegans,” bioRxiv, 2019.
  10. “Systems properties and spatiotemporal regulation of cell position variability during embryogenesis,” Cell reports, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 313–321, 2019.
  11. Leo Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine learning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001.
  12. “Long short-term memory,” Neural computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.
  13. “Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” The journal of machine learning research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
  14. “Decoupled weight decay regularization,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets